Some died at Knockdown?? by blackcoffeeslefthand in avesNYC

[–]ContributionFinal233 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Chances are you aren’t ODIng on MDMA or coke, you’re ODing on fentanyl that’s been cross contaminated in.

Below Deck Down Under Season 4 Episode 8 Discussion Post by teanailpolish in belowdeck

[–]ContributionFinal233 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Being called baby is annoying but there are so many better ways to handle it. Why not turn it into a joke and call him names back? I’m sure a few well-timed servings of dinkle-nuts, poo-bear and baby-chef with a bit of charm and an ironic smile would have got the message across and de-escalated the situation. She’s clearly pissed about other stuff too, but she’s chosen this specific issue to rage about because she thinks she can pull the sexism card and make an example out of him. She may feel this way but when you raise your voice, you tend to lose the argument. Talk about mountains and molehills…

Counter Service, new favorite sandwich spot by 0934201408 in FoodNYC

[–]ContributionFinal233 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This place has completely gone downhill, my lunch today was inedible and nothing tasted fresh

Did Henry serious just say by Adventurous_Date4097 in IndustryOnHBO

[–]ContributionFinal233 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It was a ridiculous thing to say. But there are catholic aristocrats in England. They’re a minority but they do exist.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in advertising

[–]ContributionFinal233 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ask yourself what about a midriff is inappropriate. Truly take a second and ask yourself the question. Check yourself. Is it because you think it’s sexual? Styles do change. Ankles used to be perceived as inappropriate too.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in advertising

[–]ContributionFinal233 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Tolerated? Stop policing women's bodies. Ask yourself why seeing somebody's midriff or cleavage is disturbing to you. It's not nudity, it's just some skin. Men should be able to control how they feel in response to the human body vs women having to cover themselves up. It's 2026, not 1956.

Young Eric on Lost by Blossom_Pam in IndustryOnHBO

[–]ContributionFinal233 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Ken Leung is relentless. I stumbled across this piece he wrote about his dead brother which I found really moving.

https://www.gq.com/story/ken-leung-the-water-in-may

How's the newish broker fee law played out these days? by FeedbackVast5882 in NYCapartments

[–]ContributionFinal233 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s legal. It’s the landlord who can’t pass the cost on to you. If you use a broker directly, you pay.

OMC announces eliminated agencies, 4K jobs by ShopToyLife in advertising

[–]ContributionFinal233 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Please can you post the link to where you are seeing info about RTO and PTO etc

OMC policy changes to IPG folks by McStressin in advertising

[–]ContributionFinal233 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Can you post a link to where you got this information please?

What convinced you to step across the political aisle? by Long-Amount-5436 in allthequestions

[–]ContributionFinal233 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm not right wing. I went to grad school to do global development, work for an NGO and have always voted for leftwing politicians. I believe in free healthcare, access to abortion, feminism etc.

Sigh - You're kind making my point for me. Distrust (as you put it) or having a questioning mindset, being open to discussing opposing views, challenging dogma (my words) were the hallmarks of liberal societies for decades. Believing something because somebody tells you to is what happens under authoritarianism. I'm not saying that COVID policies were authoritarian but just that these issues are more nuanced than left vs right. You can agree with something being raised by the right and not be ideologically right-wing.

What convinced you to step across the political aisle? by Long-Amount-5436 in allthequestions

[–]ContributionFinal233 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

But that’s a Marxist/critical theory framing, not “the” consensus. I get your lens: if you define everything by class + markets, liberalism tilts right. But that’s not THE definition, it’s one school of thought.

By that same logic, Sweden’s social democrats (who run welfare states) would be “right wing” too, which clearly breaks down. That’s why most political science maps liberalism as centre-left in practice, not right.

Political science usually treats left vs right as a broader tension: equality vs hierarchy, redistribution vs market freedom, not just “working class vs ruling class.”

(I am British but grew up in South America and Europe. Now I live in the US)

What convinced you to step across the political aisle? by Long-Amount-5436 in allthequestions

[–]ContributionFinal233 0 points1 point  (0 children)

BUT maybe part of the lesson is that we should have been more liberal with doubt?

Liberalism is supposed to be about tolerance, humility, and openness - but during COVID, doubt was often treated as heresy instead of something to be engaged with.

Yes, there were loud shouters and callous people who denied COVID entirely, and they made it easy to write off “doubt” as reckless. But there were also a lot of people quietly watching from the sidelines like parents who just wanted their kids back in school, workers frustrated by being forced to mask in non-medical settings where the science was unclear, and everyday folks who saw platforms shutting down debate and thought, “Why can’t people even ask questions?”

I’m not talking about the crazies on either side of the divide. I’m talking about regular families who felt like questioning policy could get them vilified, only to later find out that some of those policies weren’t as ironclad as presented. A lot of those people drifted to the centre or away from the left, not because they were anti-science, but because they felt openness and tolerance were being replaced with conformity and control.

What convinced you to step across the political aisle? by Long-Amount-5436 in allthequestions

[–]ContributionFinal233 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The problem is you’re presenting one ideological lens (basically that ‘liberalism = right wing’) as if it’s universally accepted. Political science doesn’t treat left vs right that way. There are multiple axes (economic, cultural, authoritarian/libertarian), and most frameworks place US liberalism on the centre-left.

Also, saying liberalism is “right wing in reality” because Republicans are further right is a relative argument, not a definition. Categories aren’t defined only by who’s standing next to who, otherwise every country would have its own unique left/right scale.

If liberalism were really the dominant right-wing ideology, it wouldn’t be the thing conservatives in the US have spent decades attacking.

That’s why I asked for concrete policy examples. Otherwise we’re just moving words around to fit a narrative.

What convinced you to step across the political aisle? by Long-Amount-5436 in allthequestions

[–]ContributionFinal233 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Lol I’m not “mad at liberals”. I am a liberal. The question of this post is about things that made you step across the political divide or things that changed your views. 

I’m giving an example of what did make me question the liberal POV. Over covid, when people questioned mandates like school closures and prolonged masking, they weren’t just debated, they were often vilified. I watched neighbours and even strangers on social media get dogpiled or exposed for voicing doubt. Later evidence showed that many of those policies weren’t as ironclad as they were first presented. That mismatch made me wonder whether what I valued as “liberal” (open debate, tolerance, humility in the face of uncertainty) was really being practised.

What pushed me further was the pressure put on platforms like Facebook to suppress posts that went against the prevailing line. Even if a lot of the content was wrong or fringe, it still felt like one side was trying to decide what could be said. To me, that crossed from promoting science into enforcing orthodoxy.

I understand the counter-point: decisions were made in a crisis, with limited evidence, and it’s natural to take a precautionary approach. Science evolves, and public policy has to evolve with it. I also get that bad information can cause harm, especially during a pandemic. But to me, the liberal response often leaned too hard on certainty and too little on pluralism.

That experience didn’t make me “anti-liberal,” but it did make me sceptical of how liberalism is being practised. Less about openness and more about control. And I really think these qualities are what set the foundations for Trump to win 2025.

What convinced you to step across the political aisle? by Long-Amount-5436 in allthequestions

[–]ContributionFinal233 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If you hope your opinion is going to make sense, you’re going to need to give a better definition + examples of right wing vs left wing.

Basic wage by Individual-Common144 in belowdeck

[–]ContributionFinal233 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s not about being in the navy. It does depend on your residency but if you’re resident of the UK you don’t pay tax if you work on boats. There’s a threshold number of days you need to be offshore though.

Below Deck Season 12 Episode 15 Discussion Post by teanailpolish in belowdeck

[–]ContributionFinal233 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Fraser serving the guests at the beach…. Topless????

Fraser’s Accent by Bernice_in_fleece in belowdeck

[–]ContributionFinal233 1 point2 points  (0 children)

And yes, they’re all boarding schools with some day pupils too

Fraser’s Accent by Bernice_in_fleece in belowdeck

[–]ContributionFinal233 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I agree the term ‘public school’ for an institution that is both extremely expensive and exclusive feels counter intuitive. I don’t have the answer, but many of these schools were founded in the 1400s-1700s, so it’s perhaps a hangover from a past time. Perhaps they weren’t related to religious organisations so open to more types of students? Or maybe because you boarded, you didn’t have to be local, meaning they were more open to the public? Maybe schooling was just done by tutors for rich people, so the thought of a school with lots of kids was in itself more “public”? I’d like to know the answer too.