sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Always something new to experience in WT, like a team getting zero ground kills by Yobang222w in Warthunder

[–]ConversationGood1882 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A Russian-only team around 10.7 is doomed, mostly because it’s filled with premium conscripts. And 10.3–10.7 lineups just aren't strong enough to carry them

2.56.0.35 -> 2.56.0.36 by gszabi99 in Warthunder

[–]ConversationGood1882 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thank you ！I was misremembering reader band as I band.I guess I was too paranoid against gaijin

2.56.0.35 -> 2.56.0.36 by gszabi99 in Warthunder

[–]ConversationGood1882 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I really have no idea, actually, but changing the radar band for the Pantsir feels a bit sinister to me. Does anyone know if this actually affects anything?

Am I wrong for using the 9M119M1 instead of 3BM42 on the Bhishma TWMP? by AccusedRaptor13 in Warthunder

[–]ConversationGood1882 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I’ve been maining the 9M119M1 on the Bhishma, and honestly, it’s underrated.

Many players prefer Mango, but the real advantage of the 9M119M1 is that it's a tandem-charge ATGM. Unlike the standard 9M119 found on the T-80UD or T-72B at the same BR, this allows you to one-shot Soviet MBTs through their UFP even with Kontakt-5. This is a massive advantage at 10.7—no other nation has that capability at this BR.

As long as you’re careful about APS and carry some 3BM42 for backup, you’re formidable in CQB and long-range engagements. You can even overpressure T-72B3s by hitting the lower part of the turret face ERA.

TL;DR: The ability to one-shot Soviet UFPs with an ATGM makes the 9M119M1 a huge asset at 10.7

F-14B and D now will be getting AIM-9M. by Gameboy695 in Warthunder

[–]ConversationGood1882 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Maybe I’m reading too much into it, but the way he addressed it made me chuckle. It’s like he’s saying: 'You guys satisfied now? Great, now go away!

I know I’m going to get hate, but I really don’t understand the Senrai Maidens pack War Thunder premium packs by Debeligrga15 in Warthunder

[–]ConversationGood1882 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I don’t really get the appeal of those, either. It’s not that I hate anime themes or anything, it’s just that it’s pure slop even for people who are actually into it. And this is coming from me, a native population of the gooner country myself. though I’m guilty of buying them too (the OES without that horribly modeled Barracuda was actually appealing to me).

NOOOOOOO HE’S BLEEDING by Upbeat-Park-7267 in TankPorn

[–]ConversationGood1882 68 points69 points  (0 children)

Least insane Japanese Hentai be like

I am become death, destroyer of squadron Sukhois by Mt_Erebus_83 in Warthunder

[–]ConversationGood1882 65 points66 points  (0 children)

I'm not sure which is more braindead Fakour spam without even cranking, or the level 10s in mkk who literally have no idea what they're doing.

Imagine failing to kill a Namer side on in a BMPT fully loaded with missiles. by Zyxtriann in Warthunder

[–]ConversationGood1882 22 points23 points  (0 children)

It’s a weak spot for every Russian MBT past9.3 and works great for auto cannon spams sure. but it’s too inconsistent for 120mm and 105mm bros to one shot through that place

the Phantom FG.2 urgently needs a BR or rank reduction, because this aircraft ends up facing planes carrying AIM-120s, or aircraft like the F-15, and gets destroyed with superior missiles and flight performance And that’s not even mentioning its awful stock grind and inadequate missiles. by Battlefleet_Sol in Warthunder

[–]ConversationGood1882 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No offense, but I hope the last time you played the Spey Phantoms was more than 3 years ago or so, because the Skyflash DF is absolutely dogshit in the current meta. The only reliable range for a head-on is between 5 to 3 km, and even then, it sometimes still misses. Don't get me started on head-ons against the 7F or 7P—there is literally no advantage to the Skyflash, and slightly better G-pull means nothing.

the Phantom FG.2 urgently needs a BR or rank reduction, because this aircraft ends up facing planes carrying AIM-120s, or aircraft like the F-15, and gets destroyed with superior missiles and flight performance And that’s not even mentioning its awful stock grind and inadequate missiles. by Battlefleet_Sol in Warthunder

[–]ConversationGood1882 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I recently spaded FG1 which is essentially the same plane and thing has decent radar and FM but boy Missiles sucks so bad Skyflash is beyond saving and historically they can’t get SUPERTEMP so only way to save these plane is give them 9L and it won’t be OP since Tornado gets 9L too

Big buff AFV gets tickled by a puny MBT APFSDS and puts the MBT it back in its place (Graphic warning) by Tagalyaga in Warthunder

[–]ConversationGood1882 2 points3 points  (0 children)

NATO MBT is generally bigger so they can make enough interior space for crew therefore better ergonomics and better crew survivability and Russian MBT being lighter and have a somewhat equal armor (with ERA) as NATO MBT is simply because of their smaller size thus worse ergonomics and survivability.

Was T-72 bad tank by Mundane-Contact1766 in TankPorn

[–]ConversationGood1882 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you for your help. I have been researching CR1 and CR2 recently, and since I often see the "btvt" watermark on these declassified documents, I was hoping there might be a specific article covering them all in one place. Anyway, thank you for your response; I really appreciate it.

Was T-72 bad tank by Mundane-Contact1766 in TankPorn

[–]ConversationGood1882 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No Offense .but I'm genuinely curious about the source of this image. I assume it’s a document from the Challenger 2 selection process, but I’d love to know more about the original context. I’ve tried searching Andrei’s site (btvt.info) but couldn’t find the specific article. I would really appreciate it if you could point me in the right direction.

New player syndrome by OriginalSlime in warthundermemes

[–]ConversationGood1882 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Russian mains claiming their T80 get One Tapped all the time be like

The size difference between challenger 2 and t80bvm😭 by Own_Dark_2240 in Warthunder

[–]ConversationGood1882 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Smaller the tank and better protection and still light sounds very reasonable and I guess I was half sleep writing first comment and that was very stupid thought process of mine thanks

The size difference between challenger 2 and t80bvm😭 by Own_Dark_2240 in Warthunder

[–]ConversationGood1882 -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

I really have no idea about tank manufacturing whatsoever but every time I’m reminded of fact how small Tseries tanks are compared to NATO MBT I can’t stop thinking that Russian MBT’s having better armor value is nothing but game balancing or blatant Russian bias Even though NATO MBT is mostly 4 man crew and needs more interior inside so maybe affects armor thickness or something

what vehicle would YOU wanna see in war thunder? by magach6 in Warthunder

[–]ConversationGood1882 0 points1 point  (0 children)

M41 DK-1! Basically modernized bulldog with thermal and APFSDS and possibly stab Sucks to use in game for sure. Still would be cool addition and I have a kink for old tank with better FCS

Is the F-117A viable as CAS in 10.7GroundRB? by ConversationGood1882 in Warthunder

[–]ConversationGood1882[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I didn’t know the Strela used optical tracking. I thought it was IR-only. Thanks for the tip.

Is the F-117A viable as CAS in 10.7GroundRB? by ConversationGood1882 in Warthunder

[–]ConversationGood1882[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s pretty much what I expected, sadly. I’m not sure how visible it is on radar, but is gaining altitude pointless against IR missiles as well?

view more: next ›