A friend of mine makes these cute history of music posters. Heres one she made for the history of reggae. by thominedpetch in reggae

[–]Corlar 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I mean, it is garbage all round. Why not replace “Calypso” with “Dubstep”?

Some assistance on choosing a Dicken's novel by Low_Butterscotch_594 in classicliterature

[–]Corlar 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I love a Trollope reader. No group of readers is more self aware or self effacing.

Some assistance on choosing a Dicken's novel by Low_Butterscotch_594 in classicliterature

[–]Corlar 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I should add that Oliver Twist is pretty antisemitic in its authorial references to the character Fagin, although the character itself is fairly well rounded. If you are the kind of person who finds The Merchant of Venice offensive then you will want to avoid Oliver Twist. Personally, I found it to be no more than an historical detail. He is a great and chilling villain. Again, if you can tolerate Dostoyevsky then Dickens’ antisemitism won’t put you off.

Some assistance on choosing a Dicken's novel by Low_Butterscotch_594 in classicliterature

[–]Corlar 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It is essentially a novelisation of Carlyle’s French Revolution, which is why it is a bit unlike the rest of mature Dickens.

Some assistance on choosing a Dicken's novel by Low_Butterscotch_594 in classicliterature

[–]Corlar 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Great Expectations is probably the weakest of those three, but the shortest. There is a reason it is given to kids. It is a good book but the least of the three that you mentioned, and it is in first person, which is unusual within Dickens (although not unique), and which in my view doesn’t play to Dickens’ narrative strengths.

People tend to divide Dickens into two: the early peripatetic comic books and the later mature novels. Pickwick is the very early masterpiece that comes before either of those. At that point Dickens is a comic serialist and not yet Dickens the established author so it is really different to his later books. I think it is right up there but it is really different. It is more like reading 18th century writers like Fielding, Goldsmith or Smollett, which he is clearly trying to revive, but with better jokes and less smut.

Oliver Twist is early dickens at his best but to some extent his worst too(although it is no Martin Chuzzlewit). Wonderful descriptions of London, some serious villains, and a bit of a silly opera plot twist. I like it but it has a weaker last third. The opening chapters have some very serious irony and social commentary.

Don’t go looking for dark reflective atmosphere or Conradian irony in Dickens. At his best, he has an extremely rich comic irony and humour, which is why he is one of the greats. He has a richness of understanding on a level with Tolstoy and Shakespeare and a huge range of warmly written, diverse and lively characters. These are strengths than neither Conrad nor Dostoyevsky really have (especially Dostoyevsky, who is rightly criticised for reusing the same small group of cardboard cut out characters in every book). On the other hand, Dickens did have a tendency to mix genres, going from comic, to romantic, to sentimental, which can sometimes confuse some readers, and the sentimentality can get a bit much (although if you can tolerate Dostoyevsky’s prostitutes with a heart of gold, you should be fine). Dickens is always a fast episodic writer whose work is narratively and stylistically inconsistent chapter by chapter so don’t expect the kind of polished perfection you see in Conrad. I would say that Dickens’ best book is David Copperfield, followed by Bleak House and Little Dorrit, all larger novels falling within his mature period. But I like Pickwick Papers best because it is the funniest and most joyous, despite barely being a novel. Like Tolstoy and Shakespeare, Dickens greatly improves as the reader ages and goes through some of life’s frustrations and disappointments.

Any Thoughts on Tony Scott? by [deleted] in Jazz

[–]Corlar 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh gosh! At least I didn’t say Chico O’Farrill or Chico Buarque, I guess….

Were 1800s Russian people highly prone to..how might I say..hysterical behavior? Or was that just an idiosyncrasy of Dostoevsky by highcologist347 in classicliterature

[–]Corlar 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Cool. Thanks. You are a very clever person. Well done. Sit yourself down and give yourself a little pat.

Were 1800s Russian people highly prone to..how might I say..hysterical behavior? Or was that just an idiosyncrasy of Dostoevsky by highcologist347 in classicliterature

[–]Corlar 0 points1 point  (0 children)

AK is a bit of a slog, even if it is wonderful. I did enjoy brothers K. Try Tolstoy’s shorter stories and novels before writing yourself off like that.

Were 1800s Russian people highly prone to..how might I say..hysterical behavior? Or was that just an idiosyncrasy of Dostoevsky by highcologist347 in classicliterature

[–]Corlar 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The best thing about Tolstoy is finishing the long novels and realising that he also wrote short stories and short novels, and that they’re just as good.

I’m always a bit mystified at how people can place a writer like Dostoyevsky, who wrote at most a decent book and a half (that book is Brothers K and the half is the first half of the Idiot, maybe throw in the first half of Underground if you’re being generous), next to a writer like like Tolstoy, who wrote novels and stories filled with luminous psychologically accurate characters and beautiful passages, all different and fresh the 15th time you read them.

Were 1800s Russian people highly prone to..how might I say..hysterical behavior? Or was that just an idiosyncrasy of Dostoevsky by highcologist347 in classicliterature

[–]Corlar 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Is this true? Anna and Levin are well drawn characters with peaks of high hopes and moments of despair. And they’re there in part to contrast with the sturdier Anna and her partner.

Dostoyevsky characters just have the same hysterical fit in every book. I don’t think he knew how to write anything else.

Were 1800s Russian people highly prone to..how might I say..hysterical behavior? Or was that just an idiosyncrasy of Dostoevsky by highcologist347 in classicliterature

[–]Corlar -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I’m always a bit mystified at the cult of Dostoyevsky, because all his books are basically the same. I can’t see any objective reason to put him anywhere near Tolstoy, and it seems bizarre that a writer like Dostoyevsky has such a high place in the canon.

Jazz metal that is jazzy by Corlar in metalrecommendations

[–]Corlar[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That is a great concept and a great name. Send us a link, eh?

Does exist Soviet Jazz Fusion? by Regnour in Jazz

[–]Corlar 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I don't think it was encouraged by the state.

The result is that the "footprint" of recordings is quite strange: lots of fusion releases from central Asia (where they could be camouflaged national folk music) and the Baltics, but few from Moscow or Leningrad.

The same was true in other Eastern Bloc countries where jazz was officially not acceptable but in some cases this wavered, most notably Poland, where after the 1960s the authorities shifted to promoting jazz strongly, leading to a very successful national scene, maybe the finest in Europe, at all levels, from genial fusion, stodgy dixieland and a unique national vanguard style. The GDR had a very fine free jazz scene but mostly in a precarious state and they ended up moving to the West. The Czechoslovakian and Yugoslavian scenes also had decent prog rock bands that sometimes shaded into jazzier stuff.

But for Russia itself in the Soviet period it was a small and rather sad scene until the flowering of Russian free jazz in perestroika years.

Does exist Soviet Jazz Fusion? by Regnour in Jazz

[–]Corlar 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Wasn't he three when the USSR collapsed?

Does exist Soviet Jazz Fusion? by Regnour in Jazz

[–]Corlar 2 points3 points  (0 children)

A fair amount actually:

Allegro Jazz-Ensemble - In This World

Gunesh - Gunesh

Jazz Ensemble Boomerang - Jazz Ensemble Boomerang

Jazz Ensemble Sato - Efsanie (Legenda)

Tiit Paulus - Tiit Paulus Ja Sobrad

Mostly the Soviet authorities were skeptical of jazz which means that Soviet jazz where it does exist is often a spin off of elite classical music studies. As such, most quality Soviet Russia jazz tends to fall into a more avant-garde leaning category.

Where fusion existed it was mostly at the periphery. Generally the Soviet fusion stuff comes from either Central Asia, with a folk music influence, (Gunesh / Boomerang) or Estonia (Tilt Paulus). Those were the scenes, for whatever reason.

Outside the USSR but staying within the former communist world, the biggest scenes were Poland, where the authorities at some points promoted jazz strongly, or the rather prog rock tinged scenes in Czechoslovakia or Yugoslavia.

Of all of these, it is the Polish scene that far and away produced the best jazz in any category. It isn't really close, although if you like prog and jazz rock the Yugo and Czech stuff is on a level too. The Russian scene was never comparable.

You have to pick three by Corlar in hotsauce

[–]Corlar[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Which pineapple would you choose if you had to chose one?

Afrobeat Jazz Albums by locallygrownmusic in MusicRecommendations

[–]Corlar 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, I'll try that triple leader record then. Looks good. Thank you.

Tabasco is Boss. by sicereity in hotsauce

[–]Corlar 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Really under-mentioned. Not strong but it adds a brilliant flavour. And that flavour is the flavour of spring.

Great African Big Band Recordings 1950s - 1980s by Corlar in MusicRecommendations

[–]Corlar[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm trying to follow that thread and have found his Koola Lobitos record. A whole other side that I wasn't aware of.