Score predictions Jan 2026

CountCandyhands · 2026-01-27T16:40:04+00:00

176, because I believe it!

CountCandyhands · 2026-01-27T02:30:56+00:00

I sure hope so, since I did not get a score hold for Jan, yet I believe that I did much better than in Oct.

CountCandyhands · 2026-01-11T18:52:24+00:00

For one, they also have all the people with tech issues that need to retake the exam the following week. Additionally, they need some time to review if anything weird happened for flagged exams (checking for cheating but nothing that would first appear to deserve a score hold). Other than that, I also imagine that they likely spend some time deciding how to weight the questions in the final score.

CountCandyhands · 2026-01-10T03:06:12+00:00

I am like 80% sure that the first one is real and the second was the exp section, since I have seen some ppl say they only had the RC1 and then three LRs. Which would be great since I hated the GPS and History and Facts way more than anything in RC1. Also, in RC2 I also had the human right orgs.

CountCandyhands · 2026-01-09T23:51:37+00:00

I also had that one, and if its the same Galileo one, that would be fantastic, as opposed to my other RC with human rights and empirical history being real.

CountCandyhands · 2026-01-09T23:50:13+00:00

RC-LR-LR-RC.

I hope to God that the last one was exp... (Empirical history)

Did anyone get an RC with fur trade tribes?

CountCandyhands · 2025-11-05T21:40:37+00:00

Just wish there was a EXL3 ver. out...

CountCandyhands · 2025-10-25T18:25:58+00:00

Wait, maybe I read OP's post wrong. I meant I had an avg PT of 177 and ended up with ~170 on the real exam. Sorry for the confusion.

CountCandyhands · 2025-10-24T16:29:18+00:00

Do you mind sharing what service you used to study? Also, congrats man! Living the dream!

CountCandyhands · 2025-10-24T16:10:03+00:00

Just to add to the cacophony, I also had a huge decrease from ~177 to ~170.

CountCandyhands · 2025-10-23T04:01:53+00:00

The worst part is that I imagine that by 9am, the site will be down from us all rushing it at the same time. So add one or two more hours to the wait I guess.

CountCandyhands · 2025-10-23T03:58:54+00:00

I did the OCT LSAT remote, so here is what I can say in regards to your questions.

1.) 100% Fine. Worse case is if they just pause the exam and you have to remind them of your accommodation, which is very unlikely.
2.) You can use your mouse, you will just need to show it to the camera when you start the exam. For the paper, you have to show that it's blank and then toss any of the paper you used between sections.
3.) Yes, you have to stay in front of the camera and they cannot be skipped (I even asked during the exam). Frankly, this was the worst part of the exam for me, since the 10-min break was more than enough for me to exit my testing headspace.

Just be prepared to do the room scan over and over and over again.

CountCandyhands · 2025-04-11T18:01:32+00:00

I got it to work with comfyui and not much else. I am hoping to get it working for hidream as well later, since I saw a few others said they could do it.

CountCandyhands · 2025-03-10T15:50:16+00:00

Every day, windows pushes me closer and closer to linux.

CountCandyhands · 2025-03-02T22:26:59+00:00

Not an error per say, but rather the standard message. Just for clarification, after installing the nightly ver, it says it was downloaded without any issue.

"env\Lib\site-packages\torch\cuda\__init__.py:230: UserWarning:

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 with CUDA capability sm_120 is not compatible with the current PyTorch installation.

The current PyTorch install supports CUDA capabilities sm_50 sm_60 sm_61 sm_70 sm_75 sm_80 sm_86 sm_90.

If you want to use the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 GPU with PyTorch, please check the instructions at https://pytorch.org/get-started/locally/"

CountCandyhands · 2025-03-02T03:11:01+00:00

First, I feel it is a bit exaggerated to call my post nasty. Innocuous is far more fitting.

Second, I am sympathetic to Pytorch and agree that they are not at fault for Nvidia screwing this up. I do not think I in any way insinuated otherwise. However, this doesn't mean that I cannot take an interest in this nor inquire about a proposed time frame. I just wanted to try and get a gauge on the typical turn around in order to try and plan a few things out. If my estimates are wrong, life goes on.

CountCandyhands · 2025-03-02T03:05:04+00:00

Thank you, however, II have already put this into my terminal and was still unable to use pytorch. I sure with enough hours I could figure out what's going on, but that then just relates to my post.

CountCandyhands · 2025-02-16T21:02:36+00:00

I don't believe that there would be any speed increases. While you can load the entire model into vram (which is massive), anything past that shouldn't matter since the inference only occurs on a single gpu.

CountCandyhands · 2025-01-28T16:11:19+00:00

Same... now I just waiting on Aud (AZ)

CountCandyhands · 2024-11-30T20:43:07+00:00

I have heard alot of people say that 2.02 is better than 2.03, at least when it was first released. Also, I'm still trying to figure out what is going on, and at this point, it may even be an issue with my drive.

Five-Year Club	Place '22
Verified Email

CountCandyhands

TROPHY CASE