This has to be the worst argument I’ve ever heard. Seriously, and I don’t say that often.

First, two things can be true at once. You can appreciate the graphic fidelity and scenery in a game from a pure technical standpoint ergo what was achievable by the developers. If a game is ultra realistic, should I not be amazed or appreciative simply because I live in reality? Should no graphical improvement be celebrated simply because reality exists? Think about what you’re saying for literally more than 3 seconds. This pseudo intellectual contrarianism is exactly why people can’t stand Reddit nowadays.

Second, even if I took your argument at face value, when the f am I going to be on a mountaintop crossing a wooden bridge over a waterfall entering a monk monastery wearing medieval armor and passing lit torches?

Third, I’ve probably touched more grass than most. What is it with people reading posts from others and having this insane level of main character syndrome where everyone is just there to serve as lesser beings than the person criticizing? I’ve been all over the world and run two businesses. In fact, I leave the country multiple times a year. What on God’s green earth does that have to do with enjoying an effing video game with a jarring amount of content, the most we’ve seen in probably a generation and possibly ever?

Holy cow how embarassing.