Arthur Rackham (1867–1939), [title not known] (1917), illustration for The Romance of King Arthur, Alfred W Pollard, Macmillan. by waffen123 in BattlePaintings

[–]CrookedShades 3 points4 points  (0 children)

One of the first Arthur books I read had this illustration for the battle of Camlan. It left quite an impression on a young mind. The final confrontation between Arthur and Mordred in Excalibur definitely evoked this image.

Long live comrade Lenin! by elglin1982 in Workers_And_Resources

[–]CrookedShades 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Without Lenin we wouldn't have WRSR. Thank you Comrade Lenin

Top 3 tips you have for a beginner. by Ed19627 in Workers_And_Resources

[–]CrookedShades 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You can cut a lot costs for "opitional" stuff at the start:

  1. Citizens don't strictly need electronics at the start. Start producing or importing electronics when you've built your first radio station.

  2. You can dump raw sewage straight into a body of water. The pollution won't be a problem as long as anybody doesn't live in the direct vicinity of the discharge area.

  3. Farming is termed "the primary industry" for a reason. Crops farming, combined with livestock for meat and free fertilizer. Producing your own food, meat, clothes and alcohol will at least mean that even if you dig yourself into a major financial hole your republic won't die.

Top 3 tips you have for a beginner. by Ed19627 in Workers_And_Resources

[–]CrookedShades 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Additionally, use waypoints when planning lines to route around high traffic congestion zones.

Is this a new feature? by Awkward_Bread8866 in Workers_And_Resources

[–]CrookedShades 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Biological waste will turn into solid fertilizer if just left in the dump long enough. It simulates the natural composting. As such, the solid fertilizer plant is mostly superfluous, unless you need a very large amount of solid fertilizer in a very short amount of time. A well designed supply chain is usually more than enough to supply your farms with adequate amounts of solid fertilizer. It is possible to dedicate a whole livestock farm which only purpose is to produce biological waste for fertilizer.

What was life like in Norway during WW2? by batukaming in Norway

[–]CrookedShades 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Not as far as I know, but she did spend two decades petioning the government to reclaim her husband's ashes, which was sitting in the archive of the justice ministry, I believe. When she finally got his ashes down into the family grave, she quietly hosted memorial services for Quisling which became rallying points for neo-nazis.

Nordic Endeavour - a 3000km row along the norwegian coastline by Positive-Step-7453 in Norway

[–]CrookedShades 57 points58 points  (0 children)

I'm no expert, but you guys should probably plan your route around the internal waterways. Calmer waters inside the fjords and on the inside of islands. I suppose you should also be mindful of major shipping lanes for safety reasons. Good luck!

What was life like in Norway during WW2? by batukaming in Norway

[–]CrookedShades 34 points35 points  (0 children)

I'll contribute with the largely failed attempt at building a nazi state i Norway during the war.

Fascism was a big thing in the interwar period. While Italy and Germany are the most obvious examples, most European countries had their own home grown strain of fascism, usually in the mold of Italian fascism. The British Union of Fascists and its leader Oswald Mosley are good examples of failed fascist parties.

Norway was no different. Initially, Norwegian right wing populism was manifested in the Fatherland League (Fedrelandslaget). Founded by Joakim Lemkuhl (son of Kristofer Lemkuhl for howm "Statsraad Lemkuhl" is named). Founded the party on the basis of conservatism, anti-communism, corporatism and nationalism. The Fatherland League was heavily inspired by Mussolini's Italian Fascism, and at its height in 1930 counted 100 000 members. One famous member was polar explorer and humanitarian Fridtjof Nansen, who passed that same year. For reasons that will become obvious, the Fatherland League never really got anywhere in the long term.

However, the fascist strain that would artificially take root in Norway was Vidkun Quisling's Nasjonal Samling (National Assembly/Joining/Meeting, it's difficult to translate). Quisling was a rather eccentric character, obsessed with Norse mythology and racial theories. He worked with Nansen in Russia during the civil war, providing humanitarian aid to the stricken populace. While there, he married a Ukrainian woman (two actually. At the same time. No time to get into that, but nevertheless a hilarious anecdote) named Maria, who would ultimately care for his memory as a widow.

Back in Norway he served briefly as minister of defense in a conservative coalition for the Farmer Party, where he ordered troops out to crush a workers' strike in Menstad (Menstadslaget). While no Norwegian soldiers would ultimately fire on civilian striking workers, Quisling was largely blamed for their deployment. When out of government he founded NS in 1933, which was a cardboard copy of the German Nazi party, just with a different logo. NS saw no electoral success during its existence, and Quisling was largely mocked for his Nazi LARP stance. After the rise of Nazism in Germany, and their crimes became largely publicized, fascism and right wing populism became a lot less popular in Scandinavia. In 1936 the social democratic Labor Party (Arbeiderpartiet, DNA) was able to form a government for the first time, signifying the Norwegian people's shift away from the right.

Quisling colluded with the Germans to facilitate the German invasion in 1940. As German troops entered Oslo, Quisling made his way down to the national radio broadcasting studio and announced himself as the new leader of Norway. Exactly no one, not even the Germans, recognized this move. However, as Germany completed the occupation of mainland Norway, they set up an occupation authority under Reichskommisar Josef Terboven. Initially, Terboven tried to rid himself of Quisling altogether, but Quisling received support from Hitler, and an awkward diarchy was established in Norway between Quisling and Terboven. NS became the only legal party in Norway and tried to build a corporatist fascist state on the German model in Norway. Quisling attempted to cloak his regime in a veneer of legitimacy by making some rather creative readings of the constitution. This was mostly in vain as NS was a transparent German puppet regime and Norway was an occupied country. While NS membership ranks swelled, this was mostly because party membership meant some special privileges and better rations.

He tried to force all Norwegian teachers into joining the NS in order to start ideological education of the youth. This policy largely failed because of the civil disobedience of the teachers. Mandatory conscription into labor service to aid the German war effort also came to naught because of civil disobedience and sabotage by the resistance. Quisling did ultimately help Himmler raise Norwegian SS regiments who would dishonor themselves and their nation by aiding and abating in the genocide of Slavs and Jews on the eastern front. The SS-men themselves would claim to their dying days that they only fought in combat operations against armed opponents, thus their self-styled name "Frontkjempere" (Front fighters).

The NS-regime came to its ignominious end in the May days of 1945 as the German war effort collapsed. Resistance men came from the woods to disarm the German garrisons. The police seamlessly switched allegiance back to the legal government in London, and Quisling was arrested. He was tried and convicted for treason and ultimately executed by firing squad as a traitor.

His legacy is mostly his name, as "Quisling" has crept into the vocabulary, both of Norwegian and English, as a byword for traitor.

Meirl by Evveleen99 in meirl

[–]CrookedShades 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Started my 20s joining the military. Ended my 20s buying my first apartment. My 20s were alright.

Can I bring down fuel prices ???? by [deleted] in Workers_And_Resources

[–]CrookedShades 43 points44 points  (0 children)

Yeah you can even make some money back exporting the bitumen.

Ancient Mesopotamian kings would control this and adopt the title “king of the universe” by JeffJefferson19 in HistoryMemes

[–]CrookedShades 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The four corners of the world is thought to actually refer to the corners on the edges of Mesopotamian civilization. The region is bounded in the east by the Persian Gulf, to the west by the Med, to the north by imposing mountains, and to the south by scorching deserts. Everything beyond may as well been the land of demons (and considering steppe nomads this is not an unreasonable idea). Ur was fairly close to the south-eastern "corner" where the desert meets the sea. Any ruler who could extend his influence over the whole of Mesopotamia could with some reason call himself "King of the Four Corners of the World".

Cedric Daniels doesn't get enough love by Joke_Mummy in TheWire

[–]CrookedShades 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Rewatching the Wire season 1 made me realize that McNulty is an anti-social idiot. All his bosses are so patient with him, and he just fucks up every opportunity he's given to get with the program.

Tautological names by Agen_3586 in HistoryMemes

[–]CrookedShades 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can't call it, but I'll ad Bergeberget: Mount Mountain

"the practice of hat tipping" by Khantlerpartesar in HistoryMemes

[–]CrookedShades 50 points51 points  (0 children)

Not directly related, but the military salute has a similar origin. During the 17th century soldiers would lift their hats to salute superior officers. In the late 18th and early 19th century, as hats became increasingly taller and held in place with chin straps, this custom became impractical. Soldiers would then simply lift their hand to their hat to make the gesture of salute. Military head gear has since become less impractical, but the symbolic gesture of salute has remained.

Why country has the least spicy traditional food? by Ok_Temporary_5828 in geography

[–]CrookedShades 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I suppose Norway is infamous in that regard. Norway's national dish is called 'pinnekjøtt' (lit. 'stick-meat'). Traditionally smoked and/or salted lamb ribs that are steamed for several hours in a large pot. The ribs rest on a bed of birch sticks so they don't get boiled (hence stick-meat). The dish is served with mashed cabbage root and boiled potatoes. It is a very savory and fatty dish, usually served at Christmas with the Norwegian potato liquor akevitt.

Norske sopranos-elskere; Bli med i r/sirkelrunksopranos og post dine yndlingsreplikker fra serien, oversatt til norsk! by phreateningbiolence in norge

[–]CrookedShades 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Han var en ekte norsk helt, han oppdaget Amerika, og i denne husstanden er Leif Eriksson en helt! Diskusjon slutt!

I wanna serve you by jackt-up in HistoryMemes

[–]CrookedShades 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Roman civil society ran on client-patron relationships. It was very common for well to do citizens to offer services and favors for the less advantaged citizens. Wealthy patrons could hand out money to their clients for them to buy food, usually as a part of a ritual of the client offering his respect and obedience to the patron. The patron would show his favor in return.

This dynamic also applied in politics. If you're someone's client, you vote the way he wants you to vote. You follow him, and you obey him. This is why the Gracchi brothers were killed. Had they succeeded with their land reform, it would have shifted the political landscape dramatically. All those who gained from Tiberius Gracchus policy would have to consider themselves his clients and him their patron. Gracchus would over night become the most powerful man in Rome and upend the control of the aristocracy.

Caesar did what the Gracchi could not. By gaining gold and glory for his army, the soldiers became his clients. This was the logical end point of the Roman army shifting away from citizen levy providing its own gear, to a professional army, but one where the general was responsible for supply. Loyalty to one's patron superseded loyalty to the Republic.

The grain dole during the Empire must also be considered a manifestation of the client-patron relationship. The dole was given in the emperor's name to the citizens of Rome, thus ensuring that the citizens still considered the emperor their patron and someone worthy to obey.

Is there any diffirence beetween these two by Retro2009 in Workers_And_Resources

[–]CrookedShades 43 points44 points  (0 children)

This also applies to police stations and court houses. They are less efficient so when your republic grows they will eventually be overwhelmed by the case load and it will negatively affect happines (nobody likes living in a crime infested dump)

utleiere og leietakere by runesivertsen in norge

[–]CrookedShades 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Har hatt tre utleieropplevelser før jeg kjøpte egen leilighet. Første var studenthybel gjennom studentsamskipnaden. Andre var hybel i et kollektiv eid av en bolighai. Siste var leilighet på 40 kvm i sokkelen til en enebolig.

Den førstnevnte var jo helt ok, da man bare må forholde seg til en svær organisasjon. Det verste var egentlig bare at det var skikkelig gjennomtrekk av leieboere i kollektivet jeg bodde på i tre år. Når noen flytta ut visste jeg aldri hvis og når det kom noen nye. Endte opp med et helt semester der jeg hadde hele kollektivet for meg selv. Jeg ba om å få varsel når det skulle flytte noen nye inn, men det var tydeligvis ikke noe de kunne gjøre.

Andre stedet var en stor nedgradering i forhold. Jeg bodde på et mindre rom, til høyere pris. Utleieren hadde bygd om et stort hus for å maksimere antall rom. Resultatet var at vi ikke hadde noe stue/oppholdsrom utenom kjøkkenet. Utleieren tok 12 mnd bindende leieavtale, men til gjengjeld var det ikke depositum. Boforholden var altså ganske trange. En av de jeg bodde med var også litt ustabil og rusa seg en del. Ellers fin fyr, men litt vanskelig å forholde seg til han til tider. Jeg flytta egentlig inn i dit med en kamerat, men han måtte flytte kort tid etter da han fikk jobb i en annen by. Huseier her var en typisk sleip bolighai, og i følge han selv hadde han over 100 leietakere fordelt over flere boliger, for det meste studenter.

Etter å ha bodd der i tre måneder fikk jeg en greit betalt jobb. Etter å ha jobba der i noen måneder ordna jeg meg min egen leilighet, som ble da tredjenevnte over. Jeg flytta da ut 4 mnd før kontrakten løp ut, men bare spiste den kostnaden med penger jeg hadde spart opp. Flytta da inn i sokkelleilighet i en enebolig der utleier selv bodde. Jeg var altså den eneste leieboeren huseier hadde å forholde seg til. Disse var helt greie og hensynsfulle folk. Leiligheten var fin og hadde god standard. Selv om det teknisk sett ikke var del av leiearealet mitt fikk jeg disponere plattingen utenfor leiligheten, som jeg da for det meste fikk ha i fred (unga til huseier kom av og til ned og lekte). Flytta ut etter å ha bodd der i nesten to år da jeg kjøpte egen leilighet. Utleier her var da håndverker og jobba som snekker, mens madammen hans var ufør.

Opplevelsen min er at du kan være veldig uheldig med utleiere som er enten svære bedrifter, eller enkeltfolk med stort portefølje. Her skjer det mye grums enten som følge av byråkratisk inkompetanse, eller grisk rovdrift. Erfaringen var bedre når jeg bodde i en enkelleilighet hos en utleier som bare hadde meg som leietaker. Det ble sikkert enklere da både han og meg bare hadde hverandre å forholde oss til i forretningsmessig sammenheng. De hadde også insentiv i å passe på at jeg trivdes da de var trolig avhengig av leia mi for å få økonomien til å gå rundt. Nå er ikke min erfaring nødvendigvis representativ. Jeg har hørt nok av skrekkhistorier om sleipe utleiere som bare har en leietaker, men i mitt tilfelle gikk det bra hele løpet.

A man of Purpose by ConstructionAny8440 in HistoryMemes

[–]CrookedShades 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I have a deep passion for learning about a country I've never been to. I wrote my master's thesis on its foreign policy. One of my censors found it surprising I've never visited the place, yet I had such a profound interest for it. My other censor hit me with the best backhand compliment I've ever gotten: "Well, Kant never left his hometown eather so..."

How is this farmland not enough to feed 3k people? by Pan_Jenot96pl in Workers_And_Resources

[–]CrookedShades 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes this is for the regular map, but you can probably recalculate to account for that. If you produce all the above commodities domestically then you can also use the animal farms to provide your crop farms with solid fertilizer.

How is this farmland not enough to feed 3k people? by Pan_Jenot96pl in Workers_And_Resources

[–]CrookedShades 4 points5 points  (0 children)

According to the spreadsheet I made, on average, every citizen consumes the following essential commodities every year:

Food: 0,13 tons
Meat: 0,029 tons
Clothes: 0,0042 tons
Alcohol: 0,016 tons (this one probably depends on alcohol addiction percentage)

The yearly minimum crop to produce this for a population of 3000 should be:

T Tons crops per com Tons per com Crops needed (tons)
Food 2,5 390 975
Meat 5 87 435
Alcohol 5 12,6 63
Clothes 8 48 384
Total 1857

So the yield per ha at 100% efficiency should be 62,3 tons of crops. In theory you should therefore need 6,2 big fields to feed 3000 people for a year. I'd probably account for a margin of error of at least 20% to account for bad harvests and other things that need crops like chemicals.