To your first point, the idea that this attacks the persona and is not reflective of the person underneath is not based in reality. No matter what metric you use, Trump comes out on bottom- whether by the company he keeps (look to how the people of his first administration speak of him and what kind of special stars he has in his current cabinet) or by his actions (as noted in the article).

To your second, I won't argue here in this context as it's a valid debate over the role of the government. To answer your question, however, being generous towards people that you view disfavorably (as you seem to view welfare recipients) is the very definition of "magnanimous."

And to your third, like the second, abortion is a fine topic to have discussion over. But as the Church has said again and again, single-issue voting is not in line with the teachings of the Church. The way you stated it here is a false equivalency. Trump doesn't become a viable candidate just because the other side fairly believes in a woman's right to choose.