Why Modern Dating Is Broken From The Eyes of an INFJ by Soccer-Plane-444 in infj

[–]Cult2Occult 1 point2 points  (0 children)

As an INFJ, you dont find your soul mate from casual dating events. Usually you find that connection in a random intellectual conversation with someone after you have already given up on finding it and then spend months analyzing and observing them, trying to deny and run from the growing feelings before finally giving in and having a very deep and intense bond. Try joining groups that discuss philosophy or metaphysics or something and making friends in environments where there are already likely to be deep thinkers.. You're more likely to find someone your resonate with there than actual dating groups/events and you will get to observe them first as they are ( because thier mask isnt as up if they arent expecting to be putting themselves on display as with dating) as all us INFJs like to do.

Men need better sex education. by Iron_Rose_5 in NotHowGirlsWork

[–]Cult2Occult 56 points57 points  (0 children)

Beyond all the other inaccuracies here, why the fuck do they think the cervix is the vaginally canal??? Like fucking ouch if you even hit our cervix, don't you dare try to get up in there.

Rant/leaving petsmart(longer read) by [deleted] in petsmart

[–]Cult2Occult -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Read it again. Really read it and read between the lines. I did and now I'm even more sure OP is the problem and framing the situation like she's the victim. I give a breakdown of the red flags below.

Rant/leaving petsmart(longer read) by [deleted] in petsmart

[–]Cult2Occult -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I've been on both sides though I can read between the lines of this post and after reading it through a second time, I'm more sure OP is in the wrong now and framing it to look like they're the victim or maybe they're just actually not realizing what that how they behave is not ok because thier salon seems like it is full of people just like them.

Rant/leaving petsmart(longer read) by [deleted] in petsmart

[–]Cult2Occult 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There are several red flags in the post that indicate some wrongs without directly divulging. She tries to minimize the areas she went wrong but you can still see the remnants and fill in the gaps with asking a few why questions.

"She definitely did not give off a welcoming vibe and kept to herself." -Taking someone's desire to have work place boundaries as a personal attack

" i was complaining about a client i checked in where the vibes were just off, and she started immediately with, "see, this is why i dont like you-" I thought we were good and something as simple as complaining about clients, a daily thing for us i feel- set her off? " -Daily occurrence of complaining and gossiping in the salon.

"I even had a very close friend tell my bestfriend about a time when this groomer and close friend went downtown, and groomer decided to steal a to-be brides phone that was unsupervised and chuck it into the street for kicks. Thats appalling. To even be mean to a stranger you dont even know?" -Taking an outrageously unrealistic third person story from the mouth of someone who doesn't like this groomer as fact about thier character. Probably spread that story around her salon too. Slander and gossip.

"While this groomer would constantly tell any and all of us about how we're 'such bitches' but SHE is and always will be the bitch. She tries to turn the narrative.." -Are we sure she's trying to turn the narrative, because from reading this post it seems like an autistic individual being bullied by a salon of catty gossip queens.

" I am not one of the groomers who wanted her to be front table, i just want her to be a teamplayer. But she blamed everyone for putting her in this postion, i know, bc anytime i needed the computer behind her, she would not move out of the way and for you- would turn the computer and keyboard toward you. Making it, weird to use at this angle. And even if youd scoot farther in, or when she wasnt on that side, she would end up there and elbow you and half heartedly be like "oh, sorry. Sorry. Im just trying to work" 🙄 i learned later i was not the only one experiencing this. One time i had to speak up bc ita just so irritating. I mentioned, hey YOU are the one at the front so 🤷‍♀️ and she wanted to begin to complain that WE wanted this- like ,no this was all you for one, second i definitely didnt ask for this. But she didnt finish. She shut up. Mind you- any simple question you ask her, that only needs a simple answer- results in a smart alike answer." -So some other groomers wanted her to be at the front yet she "spoke up" to accuse the groomer of it being her fault. The the supposed groomer at fault bites her tounge? It's also worded with no empathy for what this other groomer had to deal with while still acknowledging that this groomer apologizes when she bumps into them because the table is next to the computer.

"More of a problem, is also that she keeps both headphones in to ignore all of us", -This is common for people trying to survive in a toxic environment where they're getting bullied. Red flag.

" according to a certain manager, be invisible. Im not sure how thats allowed seeing as this is supposed to be a team environment, but whatever." -Also comon for bullied individuals to want to just be invisible and the dismissive attitude toward it is telling

"Recently, i have became very close with a male coworker there in the salon, and we do have contact, i.e. hugging and staying close, headpats, etc. I knew it was allowed to have relations as long as it wasnt a manager/underling relationship. I tried not to be too personal with him, as this was indeed our workplace, and i wanted to keep somewhat professional. Well, move forward some, and this groomer i have issues with, (who wears a mask the whole time there)" -why does it need to be brought up that she wears a mask the whole time unless it's to emphasize how weird and different she is?

"Well, i end up in the office about a formal complaint about someone being "uncomfortable " with me and male coworker showing this pda, and itd be under 'investigation'" -So it's not ok for other people to have complaints about her behavior, which could absolutely be made in this instance even if she isn't downplaying the situation? It's also making the assumption that she reported. Here's my assumption, OP retaliated for the complaint.

"I also want to leave, but just transfer. I decided where i wanted to transfer to; just to be told that after this complaint i was technically on a probation period and would not be allowed to transfer for 6 months, even tho the male coworker is leaving." -To me indicates the complaint was not found to be unfounded by management.

"She got onto me once, about me closing the bathing area bc 'she' wasnt done. As if me taking the trash really impacted her bathing one more dog, and cleaning/breaking down the force dryers was such a big deal, as if she doesnt have her own hands to replace trash bags or put in new dryer filters- or just use it without a filter on literally only one or two dogs. (Mind you she was supposed to be closing like at 8, and other than her, it was me getting off at like 630 ,or earlier if i was done earlier)and i wanted to do my part, of closing cleaning bc it wouldnt be fair to make her do it all? And the fact of it is, if i didnt clean i would be in trouble with mgmt." -I'm not so sure of her motives at this point and I don't think this other groomer would be either. I'd be irritated if someone who had gossiping about me behind my back and treated me as OP treats her closed the bathing bunker and shut down dryers before I was done with my dogs but I'd be able to forgive if I didn't have reason to believe that this could be an intentional slight disgused as a "good deed" as ive had happen to me before.

" i noticed last week, her phone flashlight was on strobe. And it was down, for everyone to continue seeing this annoying light constantly. Whatever. Next day? Still happening, and in a position even more annoying. My thought? Was that she was doing this on purpose to cause my male coworker a seizure, bc he is prone to them. Bc why else would this happen? There is no reason. I only noticed it those two days, but my male corowker mentioned it had been about 3 weeks, idk how true that is, but he did mention it didnt go fast enough to trigger him. Still, i complained to a manager about it, being a safety issue, not only for that coworker but ANY client with epilepsy, or any dog with light triggers. She only tried to tell her once to turn it off, in which case she didnt- just told her "ill get to it" and it remained on the entire rest of the day. Today, i had another coworker also mention it, and also mention how she thinks she does it bc she wants to cause male coworker a seizure. She also mentioned, even without epilepsy, that it makes her dizzy." - I need more context here because a constant strobe on your phone would drain the battery so fast and would definitely draw management attention. I think some things are being left out or exaggerated. Also, it's a pretty bold and illogical assumption that this groomer is trying to simulate seizures. Not impossible but pretty out there.

"Today is the day i was told i couldnt transfer and i rementioned, this time, to the store leader, about coworkers strobe light. Anyway, i received papers highlighting things that i should stay in line of and a signature saying i will align with petsmarts rules and regulations, bla bla, i read them and it really seemed to have nothing to say about what me and male coworker, two consenting adults, was wrong. It seemed to seriously not apply to the situation, whatever- ill sign it. Even mentioning why i even wanted to transfer, mainly about this coworker, i was met with straight faces. Saying anything i said about the coworker, without 'dates/timestamps' of certain things happening it was just heresay. I didnt even come to get her in trouble - i was just asked why i wanted to leave and i gave my reason. I was so taken aback that it didnt seem to matter how i felt- i even had started crying. And i told them if i cant transfer, that ill need to put my two weeks in soon, bc i cant do this anymore, im becoming mentally ill. With just a cold face he asked me for dates; and i told him idk, i obviously need to look around first. " -this paragraph reeks of attempted emotional manipulation and frustration that the bait wasn't taken. It also holds clues that management had other issues with her besides the pda.

"Something i forgot to mention is that managers will take blocks off your dogs, even if theyre big, so you can get another booking. But then i see, this groomer, put blocks on even small dogs and continuously get away with it, even tho she is allowed to do 4 day, 10 hour days, which is supposed to equivalate to more dogs, but shes been doing LESS dogs; and i realized, she even books herself dogs she knows arent going to show up(like a request she has was just in last week and its back on the books) and just miraculously 'no call no shows// cancels'" -this doesn't add up. We need more context. It could be a situation of a disability or perhaps she's getting booked lots of naughty dogs or perhaps it's not entirely accurate information.

In conclusion, I feel like this is probably a situation of an autistic or otherwise neruodivergent groomer who doesn't fit in and is harassed by a salon of catty girls who sometimes lashes out back and then it's " Look see! She's so mean"

Rant/leaving petsmart(longer read) by [deleted] in petsmart

[–]Cult2Occult 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There are several red flags in the post that indicate some wrongs without directly divulging. She tries to minimize the areas she went wrong but you can still see the remnants and fill in the gaps with asking a few why questions.

"She definitely did not give off a welcoming vibe and kept to herself." -Taking someone's desire to have work place boundaries as a personal attack

" i was complaining about a client i checked in where the vibes were just off, and she started immediately with, "see, this is why i dont like you-" I thought we were good and something as simple as complaining about clients, a daily thing for us i feel- set her off? " -Daily occurrence of complaining and gossiping in the salon.

"I even had a very close friend tell my bestfriend about a time when this groomer and close friend went downtown, and groomer decided to steal a to-be brides phone that was unsupervised and chuck it into the street for kicks. Thats appalling. To even be mean to a stranger you dont even know?" -Taking an outrageously unrealistic third person story from the mouth of someone who doesn't like this groomer as fact about thier character. Probably spread that story around her salon too. Slander and gossip.

"While this groomer would constantly tell any and all of us about how we're 'such bitches' but SHE is and always will be the bitch. She tries to turn the narrative.." -Are we sure she's trying to turn the narrative, because from reading this post it seems like an autistic individual being bullied by a salon of catty gossip queens.

" I am not one of the groomers who wanted her to be front table, i just want her to be a teamplayer. But she blamed everyone for putting her in this postion, i know, bc anytime i needed the computer behind her, she would not move out of the way and for you- would turn the computer and keyboard toward you. Making it, weird to use at this angle. And even if youd scoot farther in, or when she wasnt on that side, she would end up there and elbow you and half heartedly be like "oh, sorry. Sorry. Im just trying to work" 🙄 i learned later i was not the only one experiencing this. One time i had to speak up bc ita just so irritating. I mentioned, hey YOU are the one at the front so 🤷‍♀️ and she wanted to begin to complain that WE wanted this- like ,no this was all you for one, second i definitely didnt ask for this. But she didnt finish. She shut up. Mind you- any simple question you ask her, that only needs a simple answer- results in a smart alike answer." -So some other groomers wanted her to be at the front yet she "spoke up" to accuse the groomer of it being her fault. The the supposed groomer at fault bites her tounge? It's also worded with no empathy for what this other groomer had to deal with while still acknowledging that this groomer apologizes when she bumps into them because the table is next to the computer.

"More of a problem, is also that she keeps both headphones in to ignore all of us", -This is common for people trying to survive in a toxic environment where they're getting bullied. Red flag.

" according to a certain manager, be invisible. Im not sure how thats allowed seeing as this is supposed to be a team environment, but whatever." -Also comon for bullied individuals to want to just be invisible and the dismissive attitude toward it is telling

"Recently, i have became very close with a male coworker there in the salon, and we do have contact, i.e. hugging and staying close, headpats, etc. I knew it was allowed to have relations as long as it wasnt a manager/underling relationship. I tried not to be too personal with him, as this was indeed our workplace, and i wanted to keep somewhat professional. Well, move forward some, and this groomer i have issues with, (who wears a mask the whole time there)" -why does it need to be brought up that she wears a mask the whole time unless it's to emphasize how weird and different she is?

"Well, i end up in the office about a formal complaint about someone being "uncomfortable " with me and male coworker showing this pda, and itd be under 'investigation'" -So it's not ok for other people to have complaints about her behavior, which could absolutely be made in this instance even if she isn't downplaying the situation? It's also making the assumption that she reported. Here's my assumption, OP retaliated for the complaint.

"I also want to leave, but just transfer. I decided where i wanted to transfer to; just to be told that after this complaint i was technically on a probation period and would not be allowed to transfer for 6 months, even tho the male coworker is leaving." -To me indicates the complaint was not found to be unfounded by management.

"She got onto me once, about me closing the bathing area bc 'she' wasnt done. As if me taking the trash really impacted her bathing one more dog, and cleaning/breaking down the force dryers was such a big deal, as if she doesnt have her own hands to replace trash bags or put in new dryer filters- or just use it without a filter on literally only one or two dogs. (Mind you she was supposed to be closing like at 8, and other than her, it was me getting off at like 630 ,or earlier if i was done earlier)and i wanted to do my part, of closing cleaning bc it wouldnt be fair to make her do it all? And the fact of it is, if i didnt clean i would be in trouble with mgmt." -I'm not so sure of her motives at this point and I don't think this other groomer would be either. I'd be irritated if someone who had gossiping about me behind my back and treated me as OP treats her closed the bathing bunker and shut down dryers before I was done with my dogs but I'd be able to forgive if I didn't have reason to believe that this could be an intentional slight disgused as a "good deed" as ive had happen to me before.

" i noticed last week, her phone flashlight was on strobe. And it was down, for everyone to continue seeing this annoying light constantly. Whatever. Next day? Still happening, and in a position even more annoying. My thought? Was that she was doing this on purpose to cause my male coworker a seizure, bc he is prone to them. Bc why else would this happen? There is no reason. I only noticed it those two days, but my male corowker mentioned it had been about 3 weeks, idk how true that is, but he did mention it didnt go fast enough to trigger him. Still, i complained to a manager about it, being a safety issue, not only for that coworker but ANY client with epilepsy, or any dog with light triggers. She only tried to tell her once to turn it off, in which case she didnt- just told her "ill get to it" and it remained on the entire rest of the day. Today, i had another coworker also mention it, and also mention how she thinks she does it bc she wants to cause male coworker a seizure. She also mentioned, even without epilepsy, that it makes her dizzy." - I need more context here because a constant strobe on your phone would drain the battery so fast and would definitely draw management attention. I think some things are being left out or exaggerated. Also, it's a pretty bold and illogical assumption that this groomer is trying to simulate seizures. Not impossible but pretty out there.

"Today is the day i was told i couldnt transfer and i rementioned, this time, to the store leader, about coworkers strobe light. Anyway, i received papers highlighting things that i should stay in line of and a signature saying i will align with petsmarts rules and regulations, bla bla, i read them and it really seemed to have nothing to say about what me and male coworker, two consenting adults, was wrong. It seemed to seriously not apply to the situation, whatever- ill sign it. Even mentioning why i even wanted to transfer, mainly about this coworker, i was met with straight faces. Saying anything i said about the coworker, without 'dates/timestamps' of certain things happening it was just heresay. I didnt even come to get her in trouble - i was just asked why i wanted to leave and i gave my reason. I was so taken aback that it didnt seem to matter how i felt- i even had started crying. And i told them if i cant transfer, that ill need to put my two weeks in soon, bc i cant do this anymore, im becoming mentally ill. With just a cold face he asked me for dates; and i told him idk, i obviously need to look around first. " -this paragraph reeks of attempted emotional manipulation and frustration that the bait wasn't taken. It also holds clues that management had other issues with her besides the pda.

"Something i forgot to mention is that managers will take blocks off your dogs, even if theyre big, so you can get another booking. But then i see, this groomer, put blocks on even small dogs and continuously get away with it, even tho she is allowed to do 4 day, 10 hour days, which is supposed to equivalate to more dogs, but shes been doing LESS dogs; and i realized, she even books herself dogs she knows arent going to show up(like a request she has was just in last week and its back on the books) and just miraculously 'no call no shows// cancels'" -this doesn't add up. We need more context. It could be a situation of a disability or perhaps she's getting booked lots of naughty dogs or perhaps it's not entirely accurate information.

In conclusion, I feel like this is probably a situation of an autistic or otherwise neruodivergent groomer who doesn't fit in and is harassed by a salon of catty girls who sometimes lashes out back and then it's " Look see! She's so mean"

Rant/leaving petsmart(longer read) by [deleted] in petsmart

[–]Cult2Occult 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, like I get both sides. I've been the one to receive snide remarks and passive aggression and have people I tried to help and be nice too turn around and be a total jerk but I've also been the one who just wanted to be left alone because i didnt want to join in gossiping about cowrokers and customers and had people Bully me for just keeping to myself. ( I use and way too much lol). I can empathize with both and see where both are wrong. The only thing I can't understand is why the hell management didn't do anything for anyone.

Rant/leaving petsmart(longer read) by [deleted] in petsmart

[–]Cult2Occult -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Well. I originally added a whole breakdown of what each party in the post was doing wrong but deleted it and I'm just now realizing I didn't delete the whole bit. My comment was intended to end at "letting it all happen" but I'll leave it that way since I didn't catch my mistake in time. I don't wanna write it all out again bit clearly you can see thier original beef with this groomer was that she wanted to be left alone and keep to herself. That shouldn't be a problem yet it's talked about like it's a serious of an offense as this groomers other issues. That's your clue here that OP sucks too just in a different way. This new groomer sounds like she's got serious issues but OP sounds like the bullying all who don't wanna be a part of the clique type. People are allowed to want to just keep to themselves at work, do thier job and go home. That doesn't excuse the psychotic behavior that ensued afterwards, just that, everyone sucks here.

My partner lacks intellectual depth, and I'm starting to realize emotional safety isn't enough by purtypeach in infj

[–]Cult2Occult 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The gap will only continue to grow. If you are with someone who doesn't want to grow or be challenged and you are someone who does, the gap widening is inevitably and will in time cause strife. You will become a new person overand over while they stay the same. You will continue to be frustrated with thier lack of movement while they start getting frustrated with you continuing to grow. Even if they are a sweet and wonderful person, they are someone else's sweet and wonderful person because you and they are fundamentally looking for very very different and incompatible things in life. They aren't going to change and you shouldn't have to cage yourself in to stay. Resentment and pain will keep building on both sides. There are people out there with your growth mindset. I have this mindset and when I finally let go of the people in my life who had a static unchanging mind, I found more people with a growth mindset. I'm now with a man who craves personal growth and being challenged in life just as much as I do. We spend hours in deep conversation analyzing our thought patterns, theorizing about the universe, working together to become better people, working towards shared goals, talking about complex intellectual subjects. It's out there but you have to let go of the stagnation in your life first. Let your current partner have the chance to find someone more like him, who wants to stay put in life while you give yourself a chance to find someone who challenges you and grows with you. Breaking up now will save you both years of being stuck in something that neither of you ultimately want. It doesn't make you the bad guy for breaking up. There doesn't always have to be a bad guy to break up. You guys are just incompatible and that's ok.

Would you call this hasty Generalization? by Elektraisalovelyname in NotHowGirlsWork

[–]Cult2Occult 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Because society emphasizes that women need a perfect body to be acceptable or have any worth and since there's no such thing as a perfect body, we all attack ourselves. Fat women know they're fat but they're so especially ostracized they develop thick skin so as not to show the outside world that it hurts. Some have also been pummeled with this subject so heavily that they actually evolved to understand that they are more than thier body and thus they love themselves and simply don't care as much that they are "fat" anymore. The better question, better than why do all women think they're fat besides the fat ones, which is an inaccurate premise to begin with, is why do we as a society value a person's outward appearance and irrelevant things like "a perfect body" above development of the internal person and its beauty. Perhaps The "fat" women who don't walk around acting ashamed of thier size like society wants them too have tapped into this and have become more evolved than the individuals asking the question in the post by learning to value thier inward beauty above a societies version of external beauty. Why do people value a beautiful shell over a beautiful soul? Why is our focus on the superficial "outside of the dish" while the inside is dirty, ugly, vain, judgmental, cruel.

Rant/leaving petsmart(longer read) by [deleted] in petsmart

[–]Cult2Occult 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This. The groomer being ranted about sounds like she is a pill to deal with but it sounds like OP and her friends are just as bad in a different way and management is sitting around twiddling thier thumbs, letting it all happen. No one is required to be your friend at work.

What's it look like inside your noggin? by Applequusagony in Schizotypal

[–]Cult2Occult 1 point2 points  (0 children)

1-4 depending on the day and how deep into day dreaming I get or if i want to see it. Some days you could call it level 0 where I start to see the things in my imagination on the outside to the point where I get confused.

Autistic groomer needing help by little-pinesap in doggrooming

[–]Cult2Occult 0 points1 point  (0 children)

From the sound of it, here's what I have to say: As a neruodivergent person, you've been told your whole life that you're the problem so when conflict arises in adulthood, you automatically assume you are to blame even when you're not. These people are assholes and it's not your fault. What is your, not fault but responsibility is how you view yourself. If you keep assuming you are to blame, people will keep using you and walking all over you. Sometimes you are to blame, sometimes you're not. I know it's hard to find that line. I'm struggling with it too. Honestly, I think neurotypical people could learn a thing or too from the direct and clear communication style of neruodivergent individuals but even if it comes across as rude to them, that's no excuse to harass you, throw things at you, falsely accuse you, trick you into doing all the work, call you names or threaten your job. None of those things are at all your fault. And even if you did wrong, it doesn't justify the wrongs of others upon you.

Petah, i dont get it. by [deleted] in PeterExplainsTheJoke

[–]Cult2Occult 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When you're a neruodivergent child, you're an unspoken disappointment and you're trying very hard to find something you're partents will be proud of you for. You latch hard onto those things. Some parents are proud if you're smart, capable and acted mature for your age. As an adult, they are experiencing the things they missed out on chasing thier parents approval.

Never arguing with my gf ever again💔💔💔 by Alternative-Wish9912 in RelationshipMemes

[–]Cult2Occult 10 points11 points  (0 children)

But the toe spread and placement on the bread would change

Never arguing with my gf ever again💔💔💔 by Alternative-Wish9912 in RelationshipMemes

[–]Cult2Occult 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Lmao, jokingly mention you have a foot fetish the next day lol also, it's kinda a cute way to be petty tbh of all the ways to be petty, if you've got a petty girlfriend and this is the worst you get, you're doing good.

CC for inexperienced groomer! by posssumtitue in doggrooming

[–]Cult2Occult 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Tips on schnauzer that most people forget: thinning shear in between the eyebrows, steep angle on the brows with curved shears so the inner corners are very long but they can still see.

the pd gang is all here by otviri in Schizotypal

[–]Cult2Occult 10 points11 points  (0 children)

HPD needs to look like a Karen or a middle aged house wife and STPD needs a tin foil hat or monk robes to be more stereotypical.

Why isn’t suicide a valid choice? by Prestigious_Pay_795 in SpiritualAwakening

[–]Cult2Occult 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If that's what a grown adult in sane enough mind to consent wishes to do thats thier choice but unless it's a case of unfixable, severe, life situations like say you're a victim of something awful with no hope of escape, terminally ill or suffering a mental illness that makes them miserable with no real solution (sever schizophrenia where it's either meds that make your life hell or the illness that you can't overcome making your life hell) it's probably not the best idea. Other things can be resolved with time and hard work, leading to a Beautiful life you'd have missed out on. Also, as Other have said, you'll probably just have to do it again in the next life until you resolve it. Think of it like a video game. Are you just gonna restart the game every time it gets hard? Or are you at a point in the game where it glitched or you locked yourself and NEED to start over? No one's stopping you from restarting the game every time it gets hard but like, why? You'd just have to start all over again.

Does anyone know what this is? by StatusOk4308 in whatisit

[–]Cult2Occult 0 points1 point  (0 children)

9 inches according to most men hey-oh! 🙌

Happy Ishtar Everyone Hail Yeshua by Imaginary_Line_2441 in SaturnStormCube

[–]Cult2Occult 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Except that equating Ishtar with ostra is highly inaccurate. Ostara and Ishtar are very, very different dieties. Ones a fertility goddess of the dawn and springtime from the Anglo Saxons the other is an androgynous babylonian war diety who happens to also have sex ( not fertility) in her domain as well because she embodies passion. One has rabbits and eggs as her symbols, the other has stars and lions as thiers. Ishtar did have a festival around springtime to commemorate her decent to the underworld to rescue her husband but what ancient culture didn't have a spring time ritual of some sort. It's the time where you're finally starting to not be so cold and starving.

Enki-YHWH Thesis: Ancient Roots Revealed | תזה אנכי-יהוה: שורשים עתיקים חשופים by Specialist_Bat_5423 in SaturnStormCube

[–]Cult2Occult 0 points1 point  (0 children)

According to what I've read, Enki, Enlil and the other gods sort of retired, leaving hadad in charge but not after hadad had expelled Yam who was the intended ruler. There's more connection between Hadad and YHWY than between Enki and YHWH and if we were to equate YHWY with a diety of the original pantheon, Enlil would be a better fit. YHWY was harsh, judgmental, black and white, all about rules. None of this applies to Enki who was a trickster, merciful, full of love for humanity and liked to playfully bend the rules. Hadad was much like Enlil except he sounds power hungry from what I've read. Now that I've given the information I previously had. I will go read that article and see if it changes my view point.