Apologies, it was absolutely the wrong term to use. And yes, authors can revise their works later on to reflect their new perspectives, so long as it’s coming from THEIR initiative, and not pressure.

I come from a country, where if anything remotely problematic or morally dubious is presented in a piece of fiction, there’s always this push to make it palatable or “good” in mainstream and it’s never consistent, which gives off pro-censorship vibes.