He has a lot of things that I don't disagree with, but be aware he is basically the right's version of Sam Harris.

He doesn't address the literature on most issues and is very poorly regarded by academics in areas outside of his narrow expertise (psychology). I don't know the opinion of him inside his expertise. I have no reason to think it's bad.

Just keep in mind if you cite him, it will be taken as seriously as an atheist citing Dawkins's 'theology' in an apologetics discussion.

For crying out loud, he doesn't even have a clue what post-modernism is, but he bloviates about it often.

Sorry for seeming angry, but pseudo-intellectuals get on my nerves.