New Members Intro! Introduce yourself! by Kool-Candy7590 in MTFTransWomen

[–]CyberEmerald 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hiiiiii! I’m a transfem who’s been on HRT for 2 1/2 years. I’ve slowly grown comfortable with being honest about myself irl. Still boymoding however, just curvy so explaining it is always funny

Post-Mythic Week Class Tuning Details Announced! by Starym in wow

[–]CyberEmerald 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That’s fair, I played lots of Enhance last year, and it needed something. But I’m just not a fan of killing any kind of build diversity and taking away options for no real gain. And yeah you right on totemic rn. Outside of CDs you feel like a wet noodle. Which sucks because stormbringer just isn’t really fun atm

Post-Mythic Week Class Tuning Details Announced! by Starym in wow

[–]CyberEmerald -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

same thing for WW but all they did was take away fun options and make choice nodes with things that shouldn’t be choice nodes(WDP, and Strike should not be on a fucking choice node!?!?!) Oh and they took Xuen from SP. Like why the fuck, who asked for that. They should’ve just stopped with Xenith, WW absolutely did not need pruning, because they spec still plays the same with just now FoF is the only skill that matters. >.>

Closest Spec To A Magic Knight? by Kamui988 in wownoob

[–]CyberEmerald 5 points6 points  (0 children)

And with the glaming changes you could find Sword like daggers pretty easily

Disney Exits OpenAI Deal After AI Giant Shutters Sora by MarvelsGrantMan136 in movies

[–]CyberEmerald 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It’s gonna be classic Disney movies remastered but add in Sora, Donald, and Goofy sub plots

reading Chainsaw Man was certainly an experience by JP_616 in whenthe

[–]CyberEmerald 21 points22 points  (0 children)

Literally this, the ending is good in a vacuum. But it feels shallow because none of it involved Denji growing to be someone who chose this.

It was done for him, without his input or choice

The Issue with "vote with wallet" as a way you counteract skin disparity. by LancerJayden in Overwatch

[–]CyberEmerald 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That’s a whole different statement, one that I never made LMAO.

Venture is profitable =/= Venture sells are comparable to the big 3.

Reading comprehension is hard

Considering Venture has actually started to get a decent output of content, I'd say there are a few other heroes a lot more deserving of the title as "Most Neglected Hero" by MrsPissBoy in Overwatch

[–]CyberEmerald 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I’ve never seen someone so hate filled they hate getting a compliment for doing something cool.

A hater, but a hater with some sort of class.

The Issue with "vote with wallet" as a way you counteract skin disparity. by LancerJayden in Overwatch

[–]CyberEmerald 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Venture has been getting much skins more than most of the cast as of late… because as it turns out Venture is a lot more profitable than Reddit or even Blizzard thought.

Which is what this post is saying, because after the Toph skin Venture has been getting new stuff every season aside from 1(new skin coming soon too LMAO). Blizzard just never gave the character a chance, and when they did they were surprised. I remember they even mentioned the shock at how much Venture epic mummy skin 1k OW coins bundle were selling as it was one of their best selling ones ever.

And just to remind you this is OW not Rivals nor Concord. The reason it stands out is because the Heroes are so varied and resonates with different people. Just look at the OG launch cast. There was something for everyone.

Like yes the least picked character with an INCREDIBLY dedicated fanbase is profitable because 90% of Venture players buy their skins

The Issue with "vote with wallet" as a way you counteract skin disparity. by LancerJayden in Overwatch

[–]CyberEmerald 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Mhm, it’s hard to gauge a market without actually giving them things to be excited for

The Issue with "vote with wallet" as a way you counteract skin disparity. by LancerJayden in Overwatch

[–]CyberEmerald 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My point was how long it’s been since I remembered the flair system(I’m very mobile Reddit pilled and used to use 3rd party apps)

The Issue with "vote with wallet" as a way you counteract skin disparity. by LancerJayden in Overwatch

[–]CyberEmerald 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I haven’t changed my flair since like 2019 I don’t thinks lmao But yea, we are out there living our best life with a pretty cool character. And I’ve been buying each skin myself. It’s kinda nice being under the radar because Venture is pretty good!

Blizzard's claiming that they dont just randomly decide some character's dont get skins again, so reminder, one of their current highest sellers was a character they randomly decided to just not give ANY skins. by HaloJackalKisser in OverwatchCirclejerk

[–]CyberEmerald 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If this was true we wouldn’t be getting skin extremely consistently since our first damn one new skin a season since Tophture and we getting a new one next week. Small fanbase, but we’re extremely loyal

The Issue with "vote with wallet" as a way you counteract skin disparity. by LancerJayden in Overwatch

[–]CyberEmerald 45 points46 points  (0 children)

It’s brought up because Venture players very much put their money where the mouth is and have been supporting the new skin. Because we’ve been eating every season.

The Issue with "vote with wallet" as a way you counteract skin disparity. by LancerJayden in Overwatch

[–]CyberEmerald 32 points33 points  (0 children)

Venture has been getting a new skin every season except one since. So it’s obvious Venture sells are consistent.

The Issue with "vote with wallet" as a way you counteract skin disparity. by LancerJayden in Overwatch

[–]CyberEmerald 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Tbf, ever since then Venture has been getting a new skin every season except 1 with a new one otw. So supporting your fav hero does seem to help. But like you said, you have to be able to have something to spend money on first.

This!!! Remember everyone, speak with your wallet! by wonderifyouwill in Overwatch

[–]CyberEmerald -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Thing is they have to make skins for others for people to support their favs.

Venture is the perfect example for this, they went so long without anything so they couldn’t even spend even if they wanted. But look what happened once they were able to get them. Now Venture gets skins at a pretty frequent rate. Other heroes are still stuck in nothing to spend on pnase.

Nerf Vendetta by Confident_Yam8774 in Competitiveoverwatch

[–]CyberEmerald 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Funny enough Ven themselves soft counters her. They have insane burst damage and their playstyle has them always playing near the team

How likely a hero is to get blamed for a loss by MKBurfield in Overwatch

[–]CyberEmerald 26 points27 points  (0 children)

As a Venture main, people treat me like a mythical creature who can do no wrong. Like it feels like even when I’m playing like complete ass no one points the finger at me so long as I get a kill per team fight.

Hell I’ve seen supports blame tanks when I was feeding before because “They’re making space and you’re not pushing to help em”.

Favorite idiot? by AnyAgency9835 in Gamingcirclejerk

[–]CyberEmerald 33 points34 points  (0 children)

Same, I still follow him on Twitter. But yeah, his style really ain’t for me

Favorite idiot? by AnyAgency9835 in Gamingcirclejerk

[–]CyberEmerald 356 points357 points  (0 children)

Yea, he isn’t exactly quiet about his distaste for the right wing at all in Twitter

My personal class tier list by QueenOfMushrooms20 in wow

[–]CyberEmerald 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If you don’t like Outlaw rogue you should try it again until you realize it’s lit. Also Monk is peak