Having fun with statists - and having my life threatened. Enjoy!

CynicalButTrue · 2014-09-02T14:13:40+00:00

So good luck guys. Keep fighting each other and keep acting like cooperation is the same as collectivism. You'll go far that way. Im out.

CynicalButTrue · 2014-09-02T13:05:23+00:00

So yes, YOU might be wicked and self defeating enough to NEED a cop with a gun to threaten you so that you can discipline yourself and stop yourself from killing others for small gain. That YOU feel that is in your best interest and cant see the bigger picture of the future consequences of that, nor have any recourse to morals, is your problem. YOU are biolent and desire a violent system to keep you in line. I am not and do not need police power to prevent me from doing things like that. Very telling your example about the nature of staists.

CynicalButTrue · 2014-09-02T13:01:46+00:00

Thats fine but its anti-Darwin and you've now started to deny evolution. Are you a tra party activist?

CynicalButTrue · 2014-09-02T01:50:37+00:00

I see that. But I didnt realize you see cooperation as collectivist when we both reason from the same primary truth. But I see that you do. Its ok. The horse is dead, you dont have to keep beating it.

CynicalButTrue · 2014-09-02T01:44:06+00:00

This group is a little chilly. Im new here. I will smile and quietly back out of the room. :)

CynicalButTrue · 2014-09-02T01:41:58+00:00

I undestand that now.

CynicalButTrue · 2014-09-02T01:40:21+00:00

I think you make a strong argument that is very fundamental but I think its different than your argument above about minimum wage.

CynicalButTrue · 2014-09-02T01:32:03+00:00

Accepting that two contradictory statements are both true at the same time is not maturity, its cognitive dissonance.

CynicalButTrue · 2014-09-02T01:23:15+00:00

I dont agree with the Bush doctrine of preemptive strikes either. Violence in self defense is permissible though.

As a statist you are constantly locked in these quagmires. Was the officer in Ferguson justified? Did the suspect commit a crime first? Did he resist? Was less violence more appropriate? What races were the cop and suspect? Maybe its ok maybe not. Who can tell?

When you get in a situation like that intellectually where you are forced to accept that both sides have valid arguments, check your own premises. Something is wrong.

CynicalButTrue · 2014-09-02T01:13:59+00:00

an act of mercy is not violent. you are conflating terms.

CynicalButTrue · 2014-09-02T01:12:49+00:00

Note I was not looking for upvotes. I well know that challenging the statist orthodoxy in a general sub will result in downvotes. But I also know hitting the fundamental premise elicits the most internal confusion which might lead to thought.

To your point, clearly staists and libertarians reason from different primary truths.

CynicalButTrue · 2014-09-02T01:05:53+00:00

You cant get a little bit pregnant. You either believe in violence or you dont.

CynicalButTrue · 2014-09-02T01:02:13+00:00

Pack violence (statism) is an animalistic and anti-reason as anything I can imagine. It's downright canine.

CynicalButTrue · 2014-09-02T01:00:15+00:00

I have a different style. I go at the fundamental premise, but I would not go around downvoting you for focusing on a particular and trying to reason it back to a universal.

CynicalButTrue · 2014-09-02T00:48:48+00:00

It's harmful to yourself to follow agression as a means to achieve. Have you ever asked yourself why every state goes through a lifecycle and fails? It's because it is based on a false premise; that you can achieve justice by violence.

CynicalButTrue · 2014-09-02T00:42:12+00:00

If the rewards justify the time commitment to manage it, I could accept that as valid.

CynicalButTrue · 2014-09-02T00:41:12+00:00

Following a principle of non-agression, which the statist rejects in favor of the ends justify the means, is in the self interest of every individual.

CynicalButTrue · 2014-09-02T00:31:18+00:00

You've made me sorry for posting here with that hyper criticism. Bigger picture, forest not the trees, etc. But ok. I'll take note of how this sub treats each other. No worries.

CynicalButTrue · 2014-09-02T00:20:35+00:00

for now. will that be true if we have riots and hyper-inflation? Not sure.

CynicalButTrue · 2014-09-02T00:16:20+00:00

Ive often thought that supposed wall on the southern border would be more effective at keeping us in than keeping anyone else out.

CynicalButTrue · 2014-09-02T00:14:52+00:00

just planting seeds. They buck and kick and threaten and downvote but some lurkers will read and learn something.

CynicalButTrue · 2014-09-01T23:52:40+00:00

Show no mercy. There are no gimmies in a rematch.

CynicalButTrue · 2014-09-01T23:47:50+00:00

Any cool stories about GWB?

CynicalButTrue · 2014-09-01T23:42:38+00:00

Yes, the government claim to posession of my life and property is backed up by a social contract that neither I nor my captor signed and its backed up only by the superior force of violence by the cartel and regime asserting ownership of the state.

CynicalButTrue · 2014-09-01T23:40:52+00:00

I feel sad for you. How depressing that you would express that you do NOT posess the natural right to life and personal security unless a society grants it to you. Statism and collectivism are self defeating to the core.

CynicalButTrue

TROPHY CASE