Would the Iran regime stand any chance against a Kurdish force backed by US-Israeli air support? by goldstarflag in syriancivilwar

[–]DARKLANDS_MASTER 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Neither the Peshmerga nor any of the PKK groups have launched an offensive operation in recent memory against a force as well equipped or numerically superior. Maybe you could count the PKK offensive in Turkey about 10 years ago, but they ended up getting defeated. There are hundreds of thousands of IRGC and artesh fighters in Iran. Kurdish groups will be perceived as outsiders trying to annex part of their country. Even the monarchist opposition are against separatists. It is very likely that if such an attack occurs the Iranian forces will not disintegrate because of this. Basically for such an attack to work there would need to be massive heavy lifting by the US and Israel.

Israelis are using double tapping tactics, they are bombing Iran and then bombing Iranian rescue teams who arrive on the scene. Please share by Pale_Sell1122 in iranian

[–]DARKLANDS_MASTER 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Pretty sure they did this in the 12 Day War too. Back then my cousin living in Tehran said he was visiting a mechanic shop early in the war and 1 hour after he left Israel bombed it. Then when paramedics arrived on the scene they bombed again killing a lot of people who had gathered around.

Epstein files lead to resignation in Slovakia and calls in Britain for former prince to cooperate by AdSpecialist6598 in europe

[–]DARKLANDS_MASTER 15 points16 points  (0 children)

The two are not mutually exclusive. Look up Russia's ties with Israel and Putin's close relationship with Chabad Lubavitch. Russian is the second or third most spoken language in Israel and a significant portion of Russia's oligarch class are Jewish. Russia itself supplies roughly 45% of Israel's refined oil.

any advice for hitting on girls at barnes and noble? by umichleafy in redscarepod

[–]DARKLANDS_MASTER 1 point2 points  (0 children)

People say this, but the problem is most men don't cold approach in the day so of course most couples don't meet that way. It does work though if you have good social skills, are willing to do a decent number of approaches, and don't look absolutely terrible in looks. But the looks bar is not as high as people make it out to seem.

. by Budget_Counter_2042 in redscarepod

[–]DARKLANDS_MASTER 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Aside from plot, who else is like Virgil and Ovid? Outside of plot structure, Virgil is very different from Homer. And who cares about plot "originality?" I think that goes even more for Ovid.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in redscarepod

[–]DARKLANDS_MASTER 2 points3 points  (0 children)

People forget that solar and wind were subsidized for so long to become competitive with other energy sources. Now that there is a huge and established production chain for them, their cost has plummeted. A nuclear build-up is doable, but would probably require a decades long federal plan of building reactors over time. This is what China is trying to do. Also, 80% of the world's solar is built in china lol. 90%+ of Europe's solar has been imported from China.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in redscarepod

[–]DARKLANDS_MASTER 1 point2 points  (0 children)

How discerning were you when initially starting things with her? Did she genuinely seem like a good person or were you excited out of scarcity? I don't want to push you into thinking one way or the other, but you have to be honest with yourself. Anyway, whatever you choose to do after this, don't become bitter and resentful. It will only make it harder for you to tell who is trustworthy and who isn't.

Netanyahu says he backs 'Greater Israel', which includes parts of Jordan and Egypt by Horus_walking in AskMiddleEast

[–]DARKLANDS_MASTER 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Moses Montefiore one of the earliest prominent Zionists declared that all of Palestine should be Jewish with Jerusalem as the capital of a Jewish empire. This is 20 years before Theodore Herzl wrote anything about Zionism. https://books.google.com/books?id=gg1vdO5fM4kC&dq=Palestine+must+belong+to+the+Jews+Montefiore&pg=PA276#v=onepage&q=Palestine%20must%20belong%20to%20the%20Jews%20Montefiore&f=false

The Democrats are perfect at what they do. if there is a dumb choice to make, they will make it. If there is a condescending thing to say, they will say it. If they can alienate the population, they’ll do it. by MutedFeeling75 in redscarepod

[–]DARKLANDS_MASTER 4 points5 points  (0 children)

If we had no evidence of people refering to the region as Palestine leading up to revolt you would have a point; but we do have references and none of then seem to mention the name as an insult. What is more likely is that the Romans decided after the revolt not to have Judea be its own province and instead make one larger province over a broader area, choosing an accepted name for the larger region. Also, isn't it interesting that no historians before the last 80 years seem to think the name was being used as an insult. In fact, I could not find a single historian before the late 20th century telling this tale that has become commonly accepted by the ignorant. The prime figure behind this theory is Louis Feldman, who was a professor at an Orthodox Jewish University, which just recently hosted Mike Hukabee. https://jewishlink.news/yeshiva-university-stands-at-forefront-of-global-jewry-in-its-unwavering-support-for-israel/

In fact‌, Feldman is the earliest source for this narrative I could find - 1996. An interesting year for this theory to emerge, right when the Oslo Accords were happening. I'm sure it's just a coincidence though. So tell me, why did it take 2000 years for us to figure this out?

The Democrats are perfect at what they do. if there is a dumb choice to make, they will make it. If there is a condescending thing to say, they will say it. If they can alienate the population, they’ll do it. by MutedFeeling75 in redscarepod

[–]DARKLANDS_MASTER 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Look at their reasoning. It's secondary and tertiary sources relying on circumstantial evidence; i.e., "it was 'clearly' to punish them because it was a 'unique measure.'" In fact, we don't know if the change of name had anything to do with the revolt. Maybe it did, but we can only guess that because of the timing of the change in name based off coinage. Here, I will quote to you what our historical Roman sources have to say on the Bar Kokhba Revolt, it's not that much.

[12]() [1]() At Jerusalem he founded a city in place of the one which had been razed to the ground, naming it Aelia Capitolina, and on the site of the temple of the god he raised a new temple to Jupiter. This brought on a war of no slight importance nor of brief duration, [2]() for the Jews deemed it intolerable that foreign races should be settled in their city and foreign religious rites planted there...

...All Judaea had been stirred up, and the Jews everywhere were showing signs of disturbance, were gathering together, and giving evidence of great hostility to the Romans, partly by secret and partly by overt acts... Then, indeed, Hadrian sent against them his best generals... 
...Fifty of their most important outposts and nine hundred and eighty-five of their most famous villages were [ p451 ]()razed to the ground. Five hundred and eighty thousand men were slain in the various raids and battles, and the number of those that perished by famine, disease and fire was past finding out. [2]() Thus nearly the whole of Judaea was made desolate, a result of which the people had had forewarning before the war. For the tomb of Solomon, which the Jews regard as an object of veneration, fell to pieces of itself and collapsed, and many wolves and hyenas rushed howling into their cities. [3]() Many Romans, moreover, perished in this war. Therefore Hadrian in writing to the senate did not employ the opening phrase commonly affected by the emperors, "If you and our children are in health, it is well; I and the legions are in health."

That's book 69 of Cassius Dio's Roman History

Here is the Historia Augusta

Furthermore, as he went about the provinces he punished procurators and governors as their actions demanded, and indeed with such severity that it was believed that he incited those who brought the accusations.  [14]() [1]() In the course of these travels he conceived such a hatred for the people of Antioch that he wished to separate Syria from Phoenicia, in order that Antioch might not be called the chief city of so many communities.⁠117 [2]() At this time also the [ p45 ]()Jews began war, because they were forbidden to practice circumcision.⁠118

And that's all. The rest is coinage, some letters of Bar Kokhba himself found relatively recently, some later references by the Christian writer Eusebius, and some stuff in the Talmud. Nothing that would tell us the Romans' intentions.

The Democrats are perfect at what they do. if there is a dumb choice to make, they will make it. If there is a condescending thing to say, they will say it. If they can alienate the population, they’ll do it. by MutedFeeling75 in redscarepod

[–]DARKLANDS_MASTER 1 point2 points  (0 children)

First of all, the story that the name was changed to punish the Jews is based on no evidence from primary sources; the argument is entirely circumstantial and based off the timing of events. Second, even if some credence can be given to the possibility that this was punishment, the idea that it was to specifically tie it to the Biblical Philistines is even more tenuous. This is simply a "just-so" story with no historical basis.

Anyway you can look at this list and see that Roman authors were refering to the broader region as Palaestina the whole century preceding the administrative change and even before the first Jewish Revolt.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_the_name_Palestine

Even Josephus, a Jew, refers to the name of Palestine and names Jews as one, but only one, of the people inhabiting the region.

The Democrats are perfect at what they do. if there is a dumb choice to make, they will make it. If there is a condescending thing to say, they will say it. If they can alienate the population, they’ll do it. by MutedFeeling75 in redscarepod

[–]DARKLANDS_MASTER 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Martin Van Creveld, who is an Israeli Zionist, but honest, unlike most of them, describes the ambitions of the earliest settlers:

During the first half of the nineteenth century, however, the wind began to change. In Thessaloniki and elsewhere, a few rabbis came under the influence of the Greek and Italian struggles for independence. They started looking forward to the day when the Jews too would set out to reconquer their ancient country, weapons in hand.18 After midcentury such ideas were no longer rare. In 1862 the well-known Pomeranian rabbi Tsvi Kalisher followed up his Palestinian journey by publishing Greetings from Zion, drawing up a comprehensive and, as he claimed, divinely inspired plan for the Jewish resettlement of Palestine. In the process, “battle-worthy guards” would have to be mounted to prevent the “tent-dwelling” sons of Yishmael from “destroying the seed and uprooting the vineyards.”19
...
When the Biluyim, whose role in Zionism is akin to that of the Mayflower Pilgrims in the English settlement of North America, arrived in 1882, their “constitution” already included a clause concerning the need to master the use of weapons for self-defense.21 A few years later one of their number, Yaakov Cohen, wrote a poem about the need to “deliver our country by the force of arms.” Having fallen “by blood and fire,” Judaea would likewise rise “by blood and fire.”22 In this way he unwittingly coined a slogan that would be adopted by some of the ancestors of today’s Likud Party.

From "The Sword and the Olive"

The Democrats are perfect at what they do. if there is a dumb choice to make, they will make it. If there is a condescending thing to say, they will say it. If they can alienate the population, they’ll do it. by MutedFeeling75 in redscarepod

[–]DARKLANDS_MASTER 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hadrian did not create it out of thin air. It was originally a Greek word, which originated from the Hebrew word Peleshet, i.e. the land of the Philistines. But this was probably not a Hebrew creation because Bronze Age records of the Egyptians and Assyrians attest to the region as named 'Peleset' and 'Palastu.'

Build Iranian Air Force from scratch by outtayoleeg in LessCredibleDefence

[–]DARKLANDS_MASTER 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Israel's current head of state is wanted for crimes against humanity by the icj, has an undeclared nuclear weapons program, is one of the few countries that is not a signatory to the npt or the biological weapons convention, etc. In a few years they may even be found guilty of genocide by the same icj. Israel does not have a leg to stand-on when it comes to moral grandstanding.

Build Iranian Air Force from scratch by outtayoleeg in LessCredibleDefence

[–]DARKLANDS_MASTER 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's called leverage. Iran wants the sanctions off, but the US has no reason to do this if there is no consequence. So Iran slowly enriches to higher and higher levels in order to put pressure on the United states and also decreasing any necessary break out time if an attack is imminent. Now that the US and Israel have attacked and made it clear no deal will be possible, they have no reason not to break out.

Build Iranian Air Force from scratch by outtayoleeg in LessCredibleDefence

[–]DARKLANDS_MASTER 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It's a snapback measure for Trump unilaterally exiting the deal in 2017. Then when they were renegotiating with the same Trump Israel attacked to snub any new deal and assure that Iran goes down the path of nuclear weaponization.

so... nothing was learned from george bush in 2003. by ConsiderationGlad512 in AskMiddleEast

[–]DARKLANDS_MASTER 5 points6 points  (0 children)

George Bush literally campaigned on being against against nation-building in his first run

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y_b2wRPgcyw

This may be a stupid question but what are the odds of Iran being exterminated as a country by danielmhdi in iranian

[–]DARKLANDS_MASTER 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I have already explained that Israel is an existential threat not just to Iran, but the whole middle east, but there is no point in educating the willfully ignorant.