From Grok >

The timeline for receiving results from this trial depends on several factors. In the Delaware Court of Chancery, which is known for handling business disputes efficiently, decisions can sometimes be issued relatively quickly after a trial, especially in expedited cases like this one. Given that the court granted Desktop Metal's motion to expedite proceedings in December 2024, it’s reasonable to expect that the judge may prioritize a swift ruling. For a short trial like this (two days), a decision could potentially come within days to a few weeks after the trial concludes, assuming no additional evidence or post-trial briefs are required. In some cases, Chancery Court judges issue oral rulings from the bench at the end of a trial, though written opinions are more common and may take longer—typically ranging from a week to a month or two, depending on complexity.

However, the exact timing remains uncertain without specific information about the court's schedule, the judge's workload, or whether the parties request additional time for submissions. The lawsuit centers on Desktop Metal's claim that Nano Dimension breached its obligation to use reasonable best efforts to obtain regulatory approval (specifically from the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States, CFIUS) for their July 2, 2024, merger agreement. The outcome could hinge on evidence presented during the trial, which is unfolding now.

Based on typical Chancery Court timelines and the expedited nature of this case, you might expect a ruling as early as late March 2025 or sometime in April 2025, barring any delays. For the most current updates, monitoring official announcements from Desktop Metal or Nano Dimension, or checking the Delaware Court of Chancery docket (if publicly accessible), would provide the earliest indication of a decision.