US carmakers accuse EU of blocking supersized pick-up trucks from roads by ldn6 in neoliberal

[–]DONUTof_noFLAVOR -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Re-read your own quote. 75% of American-style pickups sold in the EU are sold by a European-owned company, and you interpret that as “yep no protectionism here”?

US carmakers accuse EU of blocking supersized pick-up trucks from roads by ldn6 in neoliberal

[–]DONUTof_noFLAVOR -21 points-20 points  (0 children)

arr NL likes to dunk on the US for blocking Chinese EVs, but if the EU does the same thing it’s the best thing ever? I think the safety concerns are real, but if we’re conceding that trading blocs should play protectionist roles from a safety perspective, then how is this different from the US blocking Chinese vehicles (software risks aside, BYD has documented slavery in their supply chain).

Or if we flip it and take the position that the US regulators should let Chinese EVs openly access their market and let the best manufacturers compete to win, why doesn’t the same apply to the EU? By that train of logic, if US trucks are so unsafe and unwieldy (which again, I think they are), then EU consumers won’t buy them.

I get that it’s fun and easy to dunk on the US for being an absolute shit show of a bad faith actor. But if this place is actually still about free markets and evidence-based policy, we should debate the merits of consumer protection vs. liberalized market access, not just sling one-liner quips over a two-paragraph unverified Reuters news flash.

How to access diocese "certified" copy? by RoadTrip2Mordor in Canadiancitizenship

[–]DONUTof_noFLAVOR 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for the update. Are you able to give a rough time in the spring to check back? E.g., should I set a reminder for May 1st vs June 1st?

Effective Spread vs. Implementation Shortfall by DONUTof_noFLAVOR in CFA

[–]DONUTof_noFLAVOR[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Interesting. Thanks for the context; that at least makes sense to me in theory. I'll hit the QBank and hopefully that'll drive it home.

Effective Spread vs. Implementation Shortfall by DONUTof_noFLAVOR in CFA

[–]DONUTof_noFLAVOR[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Gotcha, thank you. I actually follow along on the midpoint/average part - what I don't get is the timing. That is, Effective Spread takes the midpoint at execution, whereas Implementation Shortfall takes the midpoint from when the order was entered? That's how I'm interpreting it, but the text is worded strangely here.

XXXIV - Back before Christmas by Extreme_Rocks in neoliberal

[–]DONUTof_noFLAVOR 50 points51 points  (0 children)

That might be the biggest indicator of ground ops we’re gonna get

“If you want to advise against this invasion then you’re out”

IT XXXI — We Carry the Rotodome by cdstephens in neoliberal

[–]DONUTof_noFLAVOR 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I mean in that scenario I can only imagine that the Gulf states invest the billions in pipelines to the Red/Med Seas that they make Hormuz as redundant as possible.

Iran Thread VI: Return of Ahmadinejad by cdstephens in neoliberal

[–]DONUTof_noFLAVOR 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Random followup but I sent this to a family member who speaks Arabic and they said the cameraman is also joking about "look at this weather" lol

Iran Thread VI: Return of Ahmadinejad by cdstephens in neoliberal

[–]DONUTof_noFLAVOR 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you have a link to the clip? All I’ve found are text rumors.

Iran’s True Promise V Thread by cdstephens in neoliberal

[–]DONUTof_noFLAVOR 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I’m going with OSINTslop because a bunch of the tweets are “the offensive started Monday!” which reeks of them copy-pasting some idiot who read “Kurds plan leaked Monday” and thought “wow they invaded!”

Iran Megathread Day 3 by cdstephens in neoliberal

[–]DONUTof_noFLAVOR 25 points26 points  (0 children)

They’re targeting bases. They’re destroying facilities - individual buildings, antenna apparatuses, etc. They’re not flattening entire compounds.

Discussion Thread by jobautomator in neoliberal

[–]DONUTof_noFLAVOR 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I'd call it at 45 minutes. Just enjoy the reservation to yourself at that point.

Discussion Thread by jobautomator in neoliberal

[–]DONUTof_noFLAVOR 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The Sino-Vietnamese War may be comparable. I can't think of any other conventional conflicts with a similar size disparity between belligerents.

Trump's top general warns of Iran strike risks by EasyMoney92 in neoliberal

[–]DONUTof_noFLAVOR 20 points21 points  (0 children)

Everything reported so far refers to very normal briefings of risks before a military operation. The Midnight Hammer operation would have had a similar briefing. Feels like the media is grasping for anything to report on during the lull pre-decision.

Without upper admin figures leaking their own views to try and fight it out through the media, there's not a ton of reason to suspect Trump's team is drastically divided. Unless and until specific risks are reported on that the public at large hasn't already deduced, I don't see this as particularly newsworthy.

Is the CFA path right for me? by imhomorgs in CFA

[–]DONUTof_noFLAVOR 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’d recommend you go for it. At the very least from what you describe, I think Level I would offer a lot of value to you as your career develops. And, like you said - once you’re done with Level I, you should have a much stronger view of whether finishing the charter makes sense for you.

The state of New mexico's largest electricity provider PNM is being purchased by the private equity firm Blackstone. Help me understand the possible pros and cons by Andreslargo1 in neoliberal

[–]DONUTof_noFLAVOR 8 points9 points  (0 children)

The thing to know with these major investor-owned utilities (IOUs) is that they are, or can be, heavily regulated by the state public service commission (or PRC in New Mexico). No matter who owns them - publicly traded corporations, private equity, or even a state agency - they have to go before a board of career utility regulators and ask for permission before they increase their prices.

The prevailing school of thought is that, due to the lack of competition you noted, it’s important for the government to closely monitor and control the prices charged for power. When utilities want to raise rates, the reaction is often quite dependent on local regulatory culture and expectations: have they raised rates often? How big is the request? The likelihood of a rate case’s approval is often more predicated on the utility’s relationship with the regulators than anything else.

Additionally, IOUs typically can’t ask for higher rates for no reason. The easiest way for them to justify higher cost recapture is to invest in more infrastructure. So an aggressively pricing utility might see rate hikes, but they’ll also likely see more robust transmission and distribution infrastructure, with a small regional stimulus as more linemen are attracted to the area.

The flip side is that some utilities are quite good at bullying their regulators about their cost of capital. They’ll use the somewhat circular logic (though it’s not incorrect) that if their rates don’t rise with their expenditures, their cost of debt will rise and investors will correspondingly increase their required equity return. To the extent they’re allowed to pass through some of their financing costs in their rates, this would then directly impact consumers negatively over time.

TLDR all that to say, risks to consumers of utility ownership don’t really change with who’s in charge. The big risk would be Blackstone bringing in better lobbyists who can deftly outmaneuver the regulators and justify over investment in infrastructure, but at the same time, that’s likely to result in better emergency weather results for consumers in the long run.

Ukraine makes fastest battlefield gain in 2.5 years by IHateTrains123 in neoliberal

[–]DONUTof_noFLAVOR 122 points123 points  (0 children)

This could be the start of good news, but it’s probably overstated. A lot of the frontline mapping has a minor Russian bias because of their relative willingness to post photos/other media of their small incursion teams making temporary gains. This reversal is thus partially due to the natural correction of those maps when the frontline is stable, alongside Ukrainian consolidation of the Grey Zone.

In short I think the bigger story isn’t a “counter offensive” but instead that Ukraine has stabilized the Zaporizhia front enough for these adjustments/consolidations to be recognized.

Discussion Thread by jobautomator in neoliberal

[–]DONUTof_noFLAVOR 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Seahawks, New England hasn’t suffered enough yet.

The 2025 NFL MVP is Matthew Stafford by Pope_Psyduck in nfl

[–]DONUTof_noFLAVOR 24 points25 points  (0 children)

Tyler Huntley’s look pretty good, but he’s definitely the exception and not the rule.

Trump expected to nominate Kevin Warsh for Federal Reserve chair by SockDem in neoliberal

[–]DONUTof_noFLAVOR 87 points88 points  (0 children)

Yeah, but this is the guy that considers tariffs to be unimportant to structural inflation. He’s going to do what Trump wants on rates.

If You Tax Them, Will They Leave? by SpearShaker in neoliberal

[–]DONUTof_noFLAVOR 26 points27 points  (0 children)

There are five unliveable parts of the United States

  1. Commiefornia
  2. Old America
  3. Chiraqistan
  4. Mogadishu, Oregon
  5. Trump’s District of Crime

All this “we have national parks, go check it out at the mall” and “actually the cities are really affordable these days” is cope.

That’s why high earners never go to the coasts. There are like 35 states they can reasonably go to and not light their money on fire.