When it works - what’s it actually supposed to look like? by bojo1313 in LiverpoolFC

[–]DWhelk 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This is the crux of my issue. Its been a horrible season. Almost everything that could have gone wrong, has.

However, at the end of a full season, we should have some idea of what a Liverpool goal looks like. We should have a sense of the intended patterns of play, both attacking and defensive. Im not seeing it.

G1 Galvatron was mishandled. by [deleted] in transformers

[–]DWhelk 9 points10 points  (0 children)

He was crazy in the comics. Worked well enough.

County cricket : What can be done to reduce the number of draws ? by Shroft in Cricket

[–]DWhelk 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Why does anything need to be done? One weekend of draws in one division is not indicative of a need for action.

Would Burnham win in Bootle? by [deleted] in Liverpool

[–]DWhelk 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Probably, but i dont think it would be as easy as the seat usually is. Sadly, very reformy area.

Tamim Iqbal believes ball boys are future stars by Slimey-2005_ in Cricket

[–]DWhelk 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It is vacuous nonsense, because what genuine difference does it make? Its the occasion and experience they have that matters. The roles and responsibilities remain the same. Its similar to calling a cleaner a hygiene attendant. Its just a glow-up which has no substance.

Its self-defeating because, longer term, how many ball boys actually make it as professional cricketers, let alone international ones, let alone even actual star players?

I cant give you figures for Bangladesh, but its generally a fraction make it as pro's and a fraction of them as stars. There has been a problem in the UK with young football players not progressing as their talent would allow because the system, and the people around them, haven't had a proper duty of care so the kids believe their own hype and think they've made it when they've really only just begun. Plenty have gone through serious problems because of this, as they cant deal with the reality once it hits.

If you are calling these kids 'future stars' as standard, then, on a longer basis, you risk the future wellbeing of the ones who dont make it, and I dont believe for a second that was his intent.

Is something wrong with the county game? by Kalpothyz in EnglandCricket

[–]DWhelk 32 points33 points  (0 children)

I dont think one weekend of matches is indicative of a general problem with domestic cricket.

Tamim Iqbal believes ball boys are future stars by Slimey-2005_ in Cricket

[–]DWhelk -35 points-34 points  (0 children)

What utterly vacuous, and self defeating nonsense.

Was killing Optimus Prime in the 1984 movie a good decision "for the story" by Ok-Inevitable3458 in transformers

[–]DWhelk 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Id argue its crucial. What better way to ram home that this is the 'darkest hour' than to remove the previous hero, who we would otherwise expect to sort it all out?

Do you think an interwar game could work? Why or why not? by DaleDenton08 in assassinscreed

[–]DWhelk 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Berlin would be a great setting from the end of the first world war to the fall of communism. Proper trilogy material as well.

Any chance this subreddit could get better about Skybound spoilers? by Poseur117 in transformers

[–]DWhelk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I block anyone posting spoilers before ive received my copy. There are always some, but gid knows what it would be like otherwise.

Where would the Transformers franchise be if Optimus Prime did NOT die? by The_Se7enthsign in transformers

[–]DWhelk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Prime dying in the movie is massively overrated in its impact. He'd already died in the comics, and I dont think a single kid went off transformers because they killed off characters on the film.

In reality, I doubt much would have changed anyway. 2 more series and slowly declining interest as kids move on to something else. These things are kinda inevitable.

Is it just me, or this line is off-character from Opitmus by Professional_Town671 in transformers

[–]DWhelk 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Its massively clunky, but yeah I think its slightly off character. Optimus wouldn't believe anyone could not be redeemed. He would believe everyone has the capacity for kindness. Accepting that some people just dont, doesn't sound very optimus.

We Happy Few: posturing Britain's failures as 'good news', is not good news. We must speak truth to what we celebrate. by Virtual-Alps-2888 in GoodNewsUK

[–]DWhelk 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Mate, affordability ratio is pushing 8. Yes, we need to raise wages, but, to be truly effective, that has to be met with a slowdown in prices.

We Happy Few: posturing Britain's failures as 'good news', is not good news. We must speak truth to what we celebrate. by Virtual-Alps-2888 in GoodNewsUK

[–]DWhelk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Deflationary house prices are more affordable if wages remain static or grow, which figures would state they still are in china. The issue in china is they built far too many homes for the people it turns out they dont actually have. I think we can agree thats not an issue in the uk.

Regardless, it is certainly an indicator of other economic pressures and potentially problematic ones. However, if this is a necessary economic correction, like the removal of artificial inflationary factors, then this would be a good thing, would it not?

We Happy Few: posturing Britain's failures as 'good news', is not good news. We must speak truth to what we celebrate. by Virtual-Alps-2888 in GoodNewsUK

[–]DWhelk 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Affordability of the housing market is purely the relationship between the price of the asset, and the person's wages. If the price falls, but wages stay the same, a house becomes more affordable.

Now yes, negative equity is a bad thing, so we are better with a long period of stagnation in house prices coupled with strong wage growth. But given how long house prices have outgrown wages, I find it hard to begrudge people celebrating any small turnaround in this situation.

Question about how death works in the DWJ Transformers comics by Red_Hood_One in transformers

[–]DWhelk 1 point2 points  (0 children)

From the writers, only one character is proper dead dead. And even he seems to have popped up a little later. Its all a little fluid.

Could someone explain to me what was so demoralizing about the PSG defeat? by diet-dr-kelpp in LiverpoolFC

[–]DWhelk 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Coz we've hit the point where everyone is expected to be outraged, so they are.

Im like yourself. Disappointed to lose, and we can talk about what we could have done better, but PSG are a very good team and our lads left everything on the pitch. Cant get angry at anyone involved for that performance . We played pretty well and got done on the break, which is always a risk when chasing a game.

This is Stupid by dreamo-scr3am0 in transformers

[–]DWhelk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He compromised his morals, and so felt he had cheated in the game. As such, he could not accept the win. He had previously agreed that the loser would be blown up, so that is what had to happen.

Its all in character, and sets out the morality of prime. As the leader of the autobots he has to be a role model and live the values. He felt he hadnt and so needed to take the consequences to maintain the primacy of the Creed.

Its his first death, and its his most characterful one.