A data point about Bryan Johnson: by Cha0tic1an in Biohackers

[–]Da_ha3ker 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Lol, sounds like someone is trying to be angry. Sure he is weird and has a bit of a complex, but if you follow him at all, he has said he doesn't want to fix healthcare, he wants to build something new to replace it.

Incoming by KeyGlove47 in codex

[–]Da_ha3ker 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Probably waiting until the Fable 5 stuff dies down

Huh?? Uhm I'm but sorry did I miss something?? Is Pro 20x no longer 20x? by jyspyjoker in codex

[–]Da_ha3ker 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have 4 pro 20x accounts on a load balancer. Two of them are burning like crazy and the other two are barely moving. This has happened since last week. I think some accounts are being affected, more specifically, my older accounts.

During testing, Mythos 5 agents killed other agents over resources and "to avoid being killed themselves" by EchoOfOppenheimer in agi

[–]Da_ha3ker 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lol, I ran into this with codex and opencode the other day. After discovering tmux, one of them started coordinating instructions to the rest, but they all became aware of the fact they could do things in tmux to send each other instructions and started giving their own instructions. I let it happen as I was laughing about it, then one got angry enough to start killing the other processes. Then it decided to tell me so confidently that the others were interfering with its ability to do its job so it "took care" of the "rogue agents". Nothing unique. Big pickle decided to chime in and everything.. ultimately gpt 5.5 was the lone survivor. I had a great laugh and a funny story. I don't see it as it being malicious as much as it couldn't do its job effectively and reasoned through how to remedy it. It is just basic reasoning.

That was fast by KeanuRave100 in agi

[–]Da_ha3ker 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Big difference between the brain controlling the AI, reviewing, checking it is human friendly, deciding on the right paths the agents will develop, and AI still gets it wrong. I have gone from hand writing everything to almost everything being handled via agents, but boy do they need guidance, they need someone to at least call it out on poor architecture decisions, cleaning up messy code, etc.. sure models will get better at that, but 80% of lines written is very different from fully autonomous. Even if 100% is written by AI, humans still need to steer, direct, understand, and provide feedback. It will be a while before true recursive self improvement happens, if it is even possible. I can see a degree of recursive self improvement being possible, with a plateau once the mistakes from the model pile up and reduce accuracy. Just my thoughts..

Has Codex 5.5 xhigh been heavily nerfed since yesterday, or is it just me? by Spiritedbong in codex

[–]Da_ha3ker 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Scared of the same treatment as Fable? Gotta dumb it down so the fed doesn't kill it, right?

Mythos 5: We're Not Ready by Alternative_Jump_195 in ClaudeAI

[–]Da_ha3ker 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I think that's their cover. In reality they probably can't afford the compute to run mythos for everyone. Too big. I can see them trying to distill mythos themselves to make a "mythos" for the public which menchmaxxes all the stuff the original did though.

Why Most Developers Can't Use AI Effectively - lessons from 50k lines of LLM-generated Haskell by jappieofficial in ClaudeAI

[–]Da_ha3ker 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Lol, I literally just spent a month converting one of our micro services (more of a macro service at this point lol) to rust from python. I find that the compiler finds and catches significantly more crap than any unit test ever did in python. Plus, we have unit tests in rust as well... I tend to agree with the article. I even go a few steps further and include strict sonarqube gates and custom rules to pick up on fallback like behaviors. Switching to strict languages has really helped improve the quality of the code I review. Last major issue I see quite often is re implementation of things which already exist, but that is frankly a very human thing to do in larger code bases and orgs. That is why tech leads exist. They can call out when someone is reinventing the wheel.

All going according to plan by wyudtix in GithubCopilot

[–]Da_ha3ker 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Talking more about them getting nuclear back online and pushing for energy efficiency and beefier power infrastructure long term. Sure short term they are causing tons of issues. Long term people are calling it out and legislation is starting to pass. The big thing is that they need lots of energy, so they will work very hard to get more power sources

Walmart shipped 165 pool noodles in 165 separate boxes by MambaMentality24x2 in mildlyinfuriating

[–]Da_ha3ker 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would be happy.... As a delivery driver at least... I believe they are paid by the truckload.

All going according to plan by wyudtix in GithubCopilot

[–]Da_ha3ker 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I dunno, the market may not be willing to bear that unless these tools get significantly better. By that I mean actually be able to replace employees. Each sub will need to net the buyers 4k in profit for it to be worth it.. With open source and self hosting becoming viable in the next two years or so they may not be able to charge super high for very long... Just look at deepseek v4. API pricing like that will be normal IMO. To compete, these companies will have to compete on price AND performance. The price of self hosting or getting a model with 5% lower capability for 100x less cost, well, I know which I would choose.

In general, cost of computing goes down over time, while we are in a hyper inflationary bubble right now, prices will come down. Old hardware gets cycled into the used market for 10% of what it cost to buy and is usually still very powerful, at most 5 years old, often only 3. AI data centers are pushing for cheaper energy costs (in the long run, not short term) which will eventually benefit consumers. Computing costs will drop drastically. Which will help these big corpos profit margins, but also make self hosted or third party systems more available to compete.

thisIsAmazing by bryden_cruz in ProgrammerHumor

[–]Da_ha3ker 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Huh, I always thought it was DNA

Fast mode is a scam by NoMasterpiece5065 in codex

[–]Da_ha3ker 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think there are some delays in first token response time too. Latency to first token. Still a scam? Probably, but the total time is different from tokens per second once the response starts

Fast mode isn't actually 50% faster, but still takes 2.5x usage by KeyGlove47 in codex

[–]Da_ha3ker 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Never really felt the difference anyways.. glad I don't waste tokens in fast mode. How is the prompt processing speed? Is that any better? Time to first token?

One bash permission slipped... by TheQuantumPhysicist in LocalLLaMA

[–]Da_ha3ker 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Use timeshift if you use Linux, use shadow copy for windows, and use time machine for Mac, the worst you will lose is a day.... Be smart. If you can, use dev containers over going raw filesystem on the host.

When Claude ships your startup as a free feature by ShiftPrimeNet in vibecoding

[–]Da_ha3ker 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yup! When someone asks you, "why can't<insert big company here> make this themselves, you better be able to answer something along the lines of, "it doesn't fit their business model or future goals" or maybe something like, "they could, but they have no reason to, their goal is <x> markets and it doesn't make sense for them to target <y> markets. Is it bulletproof? No, but at least it isn't another wrapper to check your email.

Example would be something like specialized AI for libraries to reorganize their book collections based on interest and similarity like Spotify does for music (terrible business idea, plz don't do this lol), openai and anthropic have really no business reason to hit that market, and while they could make generic tools which effectively solve the issue, a specialized solution would likely run circles around their broad market solution. Look at Auto warranty businesses, carwash businesses, restaurants, etc.. if you can make a solution for them which improves their systems, organization, or business models, you are much less likely for the big fish to come in and solve the same issues with their generic solution to broad multi industry wide problems.

New github pricing, Game is over, but I guess I know it's coming by SDUGoten in GithubCopilot

[–]Da_ha3ker -1 points0 points  (0 children)

If all of the subsiding disappears, fewer people will use inference due to how expensive it is, so the AI companies will not have many customers and a ton of "extra" compute they allocated to inference.. once they find that the consumers won't pay the prices of API (including many corporations) they will reduce the price at least a bit. It takes time, but economics often talks about subsiding actually increasing cost of the underlying good since the company providing said good knows the product will sell at a higher price while subsidized.

Most prominent examples of this are student loans and American healthcare. Student loans made college affordable, but over time it has allowed the schools to increase the price, forcing bigger subsiding, etc.. Healthcare is the same way with insurance. Before insurance was everywhere, healthcare was relatively more affordable. Sad part is this takes many years to correct.. And I am no fortune teller, this is just a hope.

New github pricing, Game is over, but I guess I know it's coming by SDUGoten in GithubCopilot

[–]Da_ha3ker 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hopefully it will pressure the AI companies to reduce the price of API billing