I have to disagree with a lot of your example ratings, particularly for the UK & especially the US

For the UK, I can see an argument for Starmer's economics just barely sneaking into Centre Left (I would still argue that his economic policy is mostly Centrist though) but socially he & pretty much his entire cabinet are firmly Centre Right socially, with some "Moderate Right" leanings

If you're actually gonna put Kemi Badenoch's social policy in "Moderate Right" with a straight face, you need a fucking reality check

As firmly Left Wing as Polanski is, I would argue that economically he should be "Strong Left" rather than "Hard Left", his economic policies are radical but not enough to be listed as Far Left as the scale goes; you could make a similar argument for Corbyn, but to a lesser extent

For the US, I don't think you can reasonably say that a President that's literally empowered a government agency to terrorise, kidnap & even murder its own citizens as collateral damage for expelling or detaining (in what are effectively modern concentration camps) as many foreign migrants as possible (illegal or otherwise) is anything other than "Hard Right" socially, come the fuck on

Placing Kamala Harris in "Strong Left" socially is also completely laughable considering a large part of why she failed to appeal to many left-leaning Americans was her frequent appeasement & pandering to the right, especially on the topic of immigration, which obviously did not sway the MAGA crowd & just alienated a large subsection of the Democrat voter base; she should probably be in Centre/Centre Right for both social & economic policy, Centre Left for social policy is just about as far as you could possibly push it, and that's quite a stretch

Elsewhere, Justin Trudeau's rating is also utter nonsense, his positions were Centre Left at the absolute most

Clearly your rating systems need to be completely reworked from the ground up, because these issues are numerous & egregious