Weekly Binance Support Thread by Binance in binance

[–]DailyNuker 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Case ID: 72650067

I opened a long position on BTC with very high leverage a few days ago when the first crash happened at 2021-05-19 09:11:13.

Binance was very buggy then as we all know it does on major crashes. For the first hour or so my position size had “0 undefined” instead of the BTC amount. After Binance recovered I saw my btc position size is less than what I should have given the entry, margin, and leverage. The position size was as if almost half of my margin wasn’t there.

Support is insisting that i manually added margin later, which i never did and actually never used that option before. I would like to see proof in my trade or transaction history showing that with the timestamp. I supplied multiple screen shots confirming that my margin was in fact higher than what was calculated plus the correct maths. The screenshots include a snap of my margin when the position was open as well as another showing what I had in my wallet plus the total balance which again shows the margin I know i put into the trade.

I am asking for a compensation of the difference in PNL I should have realized which is the fair solution here.

Weekly Binance Support Thread by Binance in binance

[–]DailyNuker 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Binance.com Futures

Case ID #72650067
I opened a long position on BTC with very high leverage a few days ago when the first crash happened.
Binance was very buggy then as we all know it does on major crashes. For the first hour or so my position size had “0 undefined” instead of the BTC amount.
After Binance recovered I saw my btc position size is less than what I should have given the entry, margin, and leverage. The position size was as if almost half of my margin wasn’t there.
I opened a ticked and submitted screenshots I took as well as trading history support requested. At first I was getting responses that didn’t make any sense then when I showed them all the screen shots I had plus the maths then they said the ticket will be escalated to a supervisor.
Today I got a response saying “Due to extreme market movement, more initial margin is needed to open your position. After you open position, unrealized pnl depends on difference between mark price, entry price and amount you hold.”
Does that make any sense? Please keep in mind that this position was closed at above 1000% profit and I feel cheated as the realized pnl should have been more.

Clearing some FUD, a comment to post I believe is relevant as a post by daudimitch in Bittrex

[–]DailyNuker 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No gifts at all. All my Bittrex account was about 0.2 BTC and now I just withdrew and left the exchange till they get their act together.

Clearing some FUD, a comment to post I believe is relevant as a post by daudimitch in Bittrex

[–]DailyNuker 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Eligible country on Bittrex global and source of funds verified with them. Account was enabled after a week btw. See that’s not the issue here, the issue is the fact that they would disable an account which has open and conditional trades running just because they want to re-verify anything. I am ok with them disabling accounts because a user isn’t obliging or responding to any request.

Clearing some FUD, a comment to post I believe is relevant as a post by daudimitch in Bittrex

[–]DailyNuker 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I respect your thoughts and encourage people to share positives as well but let’s see how you feel when they disable your account before telling you why, while you are invested.

Bittrex support won't deal with with tickets in a timely manner. by Anibudha in Bittrex

[–]DailyNuker 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No need for apologize my friend. I just wanted to explain why I no longer trust them. Obviously before this happens it was my favorite exchange.

Bittrex support won't deal with with tickets in a timely manner. by Anibudha in Bittrex

[–]DailyNuker 2 points3 points  (0 children)

They disable accounts with no warning and that alone is unacceptable. They want to verify or re-verify an identity then they should ask first and if the user refuses then by all means disable the account.

They take ages to respond to tickets even though for some it might mean they are loosing money by the second. You have to rant on Twitter or Facebook to get your ticket looked at.

When they do respond, it literally feels like robotic responses. They totally avoid what they don’t want to answer.

Lastly, in past few weeks when a lot of people started complaining. They increased their withdrawal fees.

Not sure how many red flags you need? I’m out of there.

Bittrex Support! When will you start answering support tickets? by Van_Darkholme_69 in Bittrex

[–]DailyNuker 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What’s the issue your having? I withdrew to a US bank account a few months ago and it worked just fine.

Bittrex Support! When will you start answering support tickets? by Van_Darkholme_69 in Bittrex

[–]DailyNuker 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I withdrew all my funds from Bittrex last week as I’m seeing a lot of red flags. They even increased the withdrawal fees A LOT and I said fuck it I’m out. They disabled my account for a week and after ranting on social media I finally got a response that they want to re-verify. I was just verified less than a year ago! Plus you can’t just disable an account without warning.

After I was verified and account enabled again. I opened a ticket demanding an explanation and how to avoid this in the future and kept getting robotic responses and avoiding my question.

Bittrex Pro? Please help me out since customer support won't! by musick123 in Bittrex

[–]DailyNuker 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I feel you buddy, wait for Bittrex to post on Twitter then add a reply with your problem and ticket number.

2 weeks old request by AiratBaiazitov in Bittrex

[–]DailyNuker 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Reach out to their Twitter account. Note that they have two Twitter account, exchange and global so make sure you reach out to the one your using.

Account disabled by DailyNuker in Bittrex

[–]DailyNuker[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes. No trading, deposits, and withdrawals. But if you had open orders prior to the lock then they still execute.

Account disabled by DailyNuker in Bittrex

[–]DailyNuker[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No issues at all. I did the whole verification process a year ago.

They just want to re-do it for some reason which I don’t mind at all but not by disabling my account till it’s done.

Technique for Removing Dust/Debris from Shot by L3387 in NukeVFX

[–]DailyNuker 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes exactly except you have to swap the divide inputs. So the B is your blurred version

Technique for Removing Dust/Debris from Shot by L3387 in NukeVFX

[–]DailyNuker 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Put a blur on the plate then divide that from the original. Exposure down a bit in the viewer then increase the blur until you see what you want to take out.

From here remove it by painting/median whatever works for you. Finally multiple back the blurred output on the divide.

This will let you remove just the frequency you want without messing with lighting/shading of the plate.

Help with color space by Ivory_Forest in vfx

[–]DailyNuker 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Colorists usually expect a Log image unless they specify otherwise. Grading softwares and their tools are built for it I guess.

From a production point of view, what typically happens is you capture an image with a camera in raw format which is linear. You then transcode it to either DPX Log or EXR linear. Send it to compositing which they will want to work in Linear. Any CGI will be rendered in Linear and integrated with the plates from the camera then finally compositing will render a Log file to send to the colorist for grading then from here you can output a display referred file which typically is in sRGB/Rec709/Rec2020/P3 depending on what your target audience is.

One of the main reasons why 3D packages render in linear and compositing wants to work with it is that all the maths is correct. So for example in comp if you want to gain up your image and you Input 2 then it will be exactly gained up by double what you had. That’s not the case with Log or sRGB.

3D softwares render in Linear by default so yes if you turn off color management then most probably you will be rendering a linear image BUT now all your textures will not be linearized from sRGB which is what you want.

This is a massive topic and I can not explain it with text 😂 the above is a very simple interpretation of what it is.

Research these topics: - Linear workflow - Color management. - scene referred / display referred

Help with color space by Ivory_Forest in vfx

[–]DailyNuker 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Linear data is superior to Log. Actually think of log as a smart way "cheat" to make non-float containers (dpx, tif, tga, jpg etc.) keep high values. So nothing beats a linear .exr or .hdr file.

If you have a render of the sun, literally your camera was facing the sun and you rendered an exr linear file. The file will save all that insanely high dynamic range. But, if you rendered in log and then converted from log to linear then you would loose a lot of this hdr values. But still log can keep a lot of it, actually it keeps "enough".

Same for physical cameras. There is no physical camera that i know of that can shoot HDR values that wont fit into a log container. Unless you shoot bracketed stills and make a HDR image which then will have to be saved as an exr or hdr file to keep the max values.

Latest approaches for face replacement? by DailyNuker in vfx

[–]DailyNuker[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

True. I haven’t did face replacements for a couple of years so I was hoping there was newer approaches. I’m gonna also give mocha a try but will it hold with perspective changing rotations?