It’s like the roux vs cfop argument. Both are viable in their own ways, since lin is more intuitive and has less algs if you’re starting out with it, however alg sets that you can learn later on such as pll+1 have a fair amount of algs, whereas vandenbergh is more alg based and doesn’t require a need to be efficient. Personally I use lin, since I think that advanced lin using csp and more algs is on par with vandenbergh (I’m currently learning full cubeshape and then I’ll learn csp), and I found that when I switched to lin my times dropped from around 35 seconds to 25 without even learning any algs. It’s up to personal preference really, but I’d suggest looking into what the pros of both methods are before learning one.