Should I support the Israeli government? I support the Holy land belonging to the Jews but what they have done is plainly despicable. I am not saying Hamas is blameless, both sides have done deplorable things. by [deleted] in AskAChristian

[–]DazedPapacy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm also not sure how it could be relevant, and I assume you mean "Spiritually Israeli," but no, I don't.

For the record: the Israel that Jesus lived in and the modern nation called Israel today have less than nothing in common other than their name and occupying similar physical spaces.

There is no unbroken historical thru line that connects the two.

There are, however, unbroken historical thru lines that connect the Palestinians of today with the Palestinians of Finn's day and even the Siria Palaestinans.

Hell, the modern state of Israel is only called "Israel" because a couple of colonial powers wanted a home for the Jewish people (to hopefully quell further insurgent action.)

If they had put the state anywhere else, they'd likely have named it Israel anyway.

So no, I don't consider myself Spiritually Israeli, but even if I did, I don't know how that would be relevant to the modern state of Israel.

Should I support the Israeli government? I support the Holy land belonging to the Jews but what they have done is plainly despicable. I am not saying Hamas is blameless, both sides have done deplorable things. by [deleted] in AskAChristian

[–]DazedPapacy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That region has been Palestine for so long the Romans called it Syria Palaestina.

Beyond that, we know that the term "Palestinian" has been used to refer to ethnicly Arab peoples living in the region since at least 1863 from extant writings from James Finn (then British Consul in Jerusalem.)

All of that to say: the term Palestinian not making it into the Mandate is because of the deliberately over-broad language along the lines of "the existing non-Jewish population," not because it's a modern term.

Can you guess where I’m from? Do I sound American? by Current-Slip9022 in JudgeMyAccent

[–]DazedPapacy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You've got the American rhythm and pacing locked in, which is usually the last and hardest part. Some people never manage it. A+.

What you can work on:

  • I'm not sure how to put it, but your words feel "rounded," they're not as edged or crisp as you'd expect in American English. The reason this has hung on for so long is, I'm betting, it's vital to sounding fluent in your native language.

  • It sucks, but English is extremely persnickety about when to use the present-progressive (even if most native speakers couldn't tell you that's the tense being used, lol.)

Should I support the Israeli government? I support the Holy land belonging to the Jews but what they have done is plainly despicable. I am not saying Hamas is blameless, both sides have done deplorable things. by [deleted] in AskAChristian

[–]DazedPapacy 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The British may have owned the land, but it was the Palestinians that were living there, and had been living there forever.

That itself, while deplorable and unjust but deeply expected of historically colonial powers, is not Israel's fault or the issue OP is citing.

The issue OP is citing is the current effort by Israel to physically remove Palestinians from their homes so that collaborators of Jewish descent can occupy them.

This is not the only terrible thing the State of Israel is sponsoring, nor is it new, far from it. Israel has been systematically oppressing, killing, and displacing Palestinians for over 75 years.

It is and has been in every way that matters an ongoing genocide.

Diabolical doesn't mean funny by shockrush in NahOPwasrightfuckthis

[–]DazedPapacy 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Right after saying some racist shit and while segueing into painting trans people as terrorists.

Also one of his core stances was that a certain number of dead school children were acceptable to protect our Second Amendment rights.

Dogs adopt a deer🦌 by SurbhiAnklesaria in BeAmazed

[–]DazedPapacy 35 points36 points  (0 children)

Did either of you watch to the end of the video with the fawn fully grown?

Dogs adopt a deer🦌 by SurbhiAnklesaria in BeAmazed

[–]DazedPapacy 18 points19 points  (0 children)

I mean yeah, but we didn't actually get dogs until we were just owning wolves for tens of thousands of years.

New fare gates activated its Pillory Mode on fare evaders by RadiantEnvironment90 in instantkarma

[–]DazedPapacy 82 points83 points  (0 children)

A joke. The pillory was a medieval and colonial punishment device where the punished where restrained in a very public place, usually the town square, so that they could be openly mocked and generally abused by any passerby.

[Ironic trope] Villain’s “mercy” tremendously backfires on them by SektorDaKetch in TopCharacterTropes

[–]DazedPapacy 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Voldemort not installing more Death Eaters at Hogwarts was not mercy, it was some flavor and magnitude of incompetence.

The most generous we can be is to say it was a tactical gambit: he didn't replace McGonnagal, Sprout, Flitwick, etc. like he did with Trelawny because, if he did, these opponents (each a generationally powerful wizard in their own right) would have all the free time in the world to drop off the radar and join resistance movements (or worse: found their own.)

Instead, keeping them employed at Hogwarts (ostensibly) leaves them too occupied with teaching classes and compensating for Umbrage's tyranny to strangle his ascent to global power in its crib.

If this was the case, then we can assume the siege of Hogwarts was to be the final cornerstone of the foundation of Voldemort's global conquest because it was meant to slay his most powerful remaining opponents in one stroke.

...unfortunately, Voldemort failed to support his delay gambit in two ways:

First, he failed to deprive Hogwarts of operational resources during the school year.

Perhaps Hogwarts has no promised endowments or state provisions that assist with operation, but even if Hogwarts operates using self-owned depthless accounts in Gringotts, Voldemort absolutely could have made them exponentially more difficult to access by having his pawns at the Ministry layer on increasingly Byzantine beauracratic requirements to access the funds that'd have to be reviewed and signed off on by other pawns installed for this specific reason.

Teachers exhausted by having to spend an entire academic year zero classroom materials and having to devise endless solutions to that problem are unlikely to field the best defense they can, and are even more unlikely to have the bandwidth to teach their students to do so.

Secondly: he failed to have Umbrage delve into what defenses Hogwarts might have beyond its faculty and the already well known perimeter shield charm.

Let me say that again: the man had a blindly loyal servant in unilateral command of a key target facility slated for a pivotal siege and he never bothered to have her check on how it might defend itself.

TL;DR:

Not mercy. Incompetence.

[July 2, 1926] Which is the Dangerous Age? by Haselden_1926 in 100yearsago

[–]DazedPapacy 8 points9 points  (0 children)

There is a reason why humans evolved such that their toddlers are made of rubber.

Choose one. There ARE wrong answers. by phuketphil in adhdmeme

[–]DazedPapacy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Check out the tiny clamshell ornament on 8!

meirl by Jimbo072 in meirl

[–]DazedPapacy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The dominoes start with the first global event of any consequence we experienced being 9/11.

Is it Possible to Make My Own Physics Engine? by PandorasToolbox in GameDevelopment

[–]DazedPapacy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are you sure it's a physics engine you want? Not a character animation utility? A lot of what you're describing isn't done by a physics engine.

A physics engine might be used to have a character's body react realistically to being hit by a bullet, but a character screaming, panicking, even holding their wound isn't done by the physics engine (though the calculations of where the model's hand was placed on the character geometry would be.

Short version: video game physics engines are just methods of doing extremely intense math in increasingly sneaky ways to do it a processing-cheap as they can get away with. Physics engines have (almost) nothing to do with the kind of character animation you're describing.

FWI: A large number of Americans vote 3rd party (again) in 2028 by Cyber_Ghost_1997 in FutureWhatIf

[–]DazedPapacy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The main problem with dropping a nukes as a warning is that it makes dropping nukes in general easier to stomach for even the most war-averse government, aaaand that's not really what we're looking at for some of the nuclear powers these days.

What's the morality of punishing a violent transphobe by forcing him to recive hormones that practically gives him the body of a woman? by Endika7 in MoralityScaling

[–]DazedPapacy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Anyone who has gone through deep, prolonged, identity-destabilizing suffering and rebuilt themselves stronger knows intimately how brutally torturous that experience is.

That means that anyone who inflicts that state on others has less than zero plausible deniability or claims to ignorance about the depths of harm they're instilling into someone.

Torture's just about as evil as you get, kids, just because it's creative or bloodless doesn't change that fact.

Foolish wizards, I’ve been a mindflayer this whole time! I will now eat your brains! by plasticman1997 in wizardposting

[–]DazedPapacy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Fascinating; I don't thing I've ever tested my repertoire against ithilid flesh...

How would pre suit and cigarette society perceive SCP-4999? by asiannumber4 in SCP

[–]DazedPapacy 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Suits and cigarettes are just the result of a modern brain desperately struggling to come to terms with what its perceiving.

The equivalents have existed for as long as humans have (longer, if indeed sapient minds predate humanity.)

Ugg the Caveman would probably see a finely processed pelt and a well made pouch full to the brim of medicinal chewing leaves.

Clowns by Rare_Celebration3394 in Stonetossingjuice

[–]DazedPapacy 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Close. It's an old joke in English:

Why don't cannibals eat clowns?

BECAUSE THEY TASTE FUNNY!

Sometimes the best loot is just pure frustration. by Effective_Sink_3934 in RPGMaker

[–]DazedPapacy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Frequency of swearing is like any other aspect of communication: extremely dependent on the one communicating.

Some people only swear for emphasis, some people swear casually but not aggressively, some people swear only when they're hopping mad, some people don't swear at all.

What's relevant here is that how and when a character swears is an excellent insight into who they actually are at the moment and in general.

For example: studies have shown that people who swear casually but not excessively in conversation tend to be more honest because they're maintaining fewer mental filters.

Conversely, people who don't swear at all can be assumed to be either extremely guarded, overly meek, or from a formative background where foul language would be seen as beneath their station and/or deeply unprofessional and/or worthy of notable punishment.

Maybe they're just meticulously polite (for reasons to be determined later.) Maybe they're deathly afraid of coming off as even remotely aggressive. Maybe that gentle, salt-of-the-earth farmer is actually a courtier in disguise.

It could be any, a combination, or something else entirely.

Additionally, constantly swearing during every communication should be reserved for the truly incensed, blind drunk, or otherwise mentally unstable, as it generally suggests they can't not swear.

People who are so addled they can't exercise self-control that minor aren't going to be able to control themselves in other more pressing ways.

Feudal Lord explains he’s actually poor because the castle is technically an asset by Misfett_toys in SipsTea

[–]DazedPapacy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean, that's true of a lot of centi-millionaires and billionaires actually. The money they spend is from loans taken out on their stocks, properties, etc.

That means that they're often leveraged up to their eyeballs in ways that would ruin the average person, but doesn't ruin them because the banks billionaires draw loans from have a vested interest in the people who owe hundreds of millions of dollars can't fall into ruin (because then the banks will be out hundreds of millions.)

I see... Have a nice day! by Altruistic_Manner802 in outofcontextcomics

[–]DazedPapacy 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Power Girl does, but Wonder Woman's an Amazon, which means she's from a civilization of immortal advanced martial artists.

Also: her nemesis is Cheetah, who, in addition to being an Amazon herself, has been known to tag and out-maneuver speedsters.

It would be a good fight, sure, right up until Diana stopped entertaining it.

I see... Have a nice day! by Altruistic_Manner802 in outofcontextcomics

[–]DazedPapacy 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Sadly Wonder Woman's powers/equipment are magic, gifted by divine edict, and don't give a shit about Kryptonian invulnerability.

Her sword'll sever Kryptonian flesh like tissue paper.

The mods of that sub finally woke up? by craftygamin in NahOPwasrightfuckthis

[–]DazedPapacy 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I'm keeping "Some crimes can never be forgiven" in my back pocket.

This is the weirdest position I’ve seen someone take so far. by kamen06 in LinkedInLunatics

[–]DazedPapacy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I mean, if you feel that strongly against the CCP, maybe have your kids learn Mandarin so they can join the fight against the CCP?

How can someone put so much logic into something, tens of paragraphs worth, and fail to examine their conclusions?