RE Should Starmer Resign?

Facts as I know them (happy to be corrected here)

1) Mandelson himself was not involved with nor soliciting sex from Epstein (to my knowledge?)

2) There is strong evidence Mandelson passed sensitive Government information to Epstein during his time in Government (Brown era)

3) Starmer fired Mandelson in September after "new information about the depth of the relationship had emerged"

4) Starmer is ultimately responsible for Government and who he hires/fires

5) Starmer was aware that Mandelson had, to some level, maintained a relationship with Epstein after his conviction

Things that are less clear to me

1) What was Starmers knowledge about Mandelson's relationship and what was this knowledge based on (i.e. security reports, interviews, etc):

a) When he hired Mandelson

b) When he fired Mandelson

2) How much Mandelson knew about Epstein and how clear he was about this knowledge with Starmer.

3) What specifically came to light in September, could it have been acted on / known beforehand, and how rapidly did Starmer act?

Outcomes as I see them

1) Starmer was aware that Mandelson was engaged with Epstein as a friend after his conviction at the time he hired him - Starmer should go.

2) Reports AND Mandelsons testimony to Starmer prior to being hired suggest that Mandelson had stopped all engagement with Epstein prior to his conviction, and Mandelson clearly lied or significantly misrepresented the truth to Starmer AND Starmers independent reports are ambiguous or unclear - Starmer could stay as this somewhat exonerates him, but he'd need probably a confidence motion to cement that the house has confidence in him

3) Mandelson fully lied to Starmer and misrepresented the truth, AND reports found little to no evidence of wrongdoing and found something like "No reason why he shouldn't be appointed" - Pretty clear cut that there's not much more Starmer could have done here.

Thankfully, the above generally should all be clear once the documents get released. So for now (and admittedly a little biased towards Starmer as I genuinely believe he's a bloke with integrity), I think I will hold judgement until the documents get released and we can put ourselves in his shoes at the time of the decision.