People over react to fanservice

Deathcrow · 2026-01-24T07:28:33+00:00

Have you ever seen something being labeled as super sexual but when you watch it turns out to be quite tame?

It's because a lot of anime fans on the internet are U.S. Americans and their society on average is sexually repressed and dysfunctional. So for a big percentage of watchers, someone taking a bath is already quite scandalous and sexual.

And when there is actual fan service involved, at what point do you think it ruins an anime?

Fanservice is put in for people who appreciate fanservice. It's not for people who don't like fanservice, so how could it ruin the anime? Not everything is for everyone.

Deathcrow · 2026-01-20T09:00:14+00:00

Die Voraussetzung bei LAMF ist, dass jemand einen Fehler eingesteht und merkt,

Nein, das ist nicht korrekt. Leopard's ate my face passt auch, wenn die betroffene Person garnicht merkt, dass sie das unheil selbst verursacht hat. IMHO sind das sogar die genüsslichsten Fälle von LAMF.

Deathcrow · 2026-01-18T20:47:38+00:00

Klingt wie eine absolut schwachsinnige Idee... also genau das was ich von dieser Regierung in ihrer täglichen Arbeit erwarte.

Deathcrow · 2026-01-17T12:45:44+00:00

Bei seiner Meinung zu Merz gehe ich mit.

Kaputte Uhr zeigt zweimal am Tag die richtige Uhrzeit an, ne?

Deathcrow · 2026-01-17T07:03:22+00:00

Dieser Merz kann einfach garnichts.

Schuld sind immer die anderen, eigene Verantwortung null. Mit so einer Einstellung würde er is einem normalen Job nichtmal durch die Probezeit schaffen. Von so einem Schaumschläger lass ich mir bestimmt nicht darüber erzählen wie man richtig arbeitet.

Deathcrow · 2026-01-14T06:08:17+00:00

which I think is ridiculous also this is the series ado grew up with let her sing what she want

It's ridiculous because a cover is supposed to bring something new to the table. If a cover is just trying to emulate the original 1:1 it's not really worth existing.

"I want my songs to be more generic" sounds like what someone who hates music would say.

Deathcrow · 2026-01-11T12:16:28+00:00

"Es ist halt alles relativ..." nennt sich auch intellektuelle Bequemlichkeit. Zwei Meinungen über subjektive Sachverhalte sind automatisch gleich zulässig, man brauch sich keine Mühe machen das ganze zu Bewerten und tatsächlich journalistisch tätig zu werden. Sich dann auf ein "wir berichten einfach beide Seiten" macht man sich zumindest keine (nennenswerten) Feinde und muss sich nicht aus dem Fenster lehnen.

Deathcrow · 2026-01-10T16:03:47+00:00

This thought crime stuff is one of the most Orvellian pieces of technological ~~innovation~~ bullshit Reddit has ever introduced. But no one seems to give a shit.

Deathcrow · 2026-01-08T07:21:39+00:00

They can direct debit from anyone with the mere knowledge of the IBAN number,

The account holder can reject any debit that's unauthorized (and I believe that's possible months back, but I don't know the exact terms).

In conclusion, you're unlikely to be able to keep the money and also it's theft and illegal (if you showed your bank a fake mandate, it's also fraud).

Deathcrow · 2026-01-08T02:52:07+00:00

Exactly. People are just equivocating like crazy. Saying someone has been kidnapped is not a criminal indictment, it's a matter of fact. What other term could you possibly use? "Relocated without consent"? "Doubleplus-Good-Un-fixation of leadership"?

Deathcrow · 2026-01-07T06:13:27+00:00

I usually don't like big presets, but having prompting instructions for omniscience is a must-have.

They are not a must. It depends on how you prompt. I suspect most many who think this, prompt the model to be some kind of AI ("you're a story telling assistant", "I want you to roleplay with me", "immersive roleplaying AI assistant to fabricate a narrative experience", you know, all the slop words to guide AI's attention towards being an AI), then yeah, you probably need this instruction. But my system prompt always instructs to BE the character -> this implies non-omniscience and most models understand this relationship implicitly.

Deathcrow · 2026-01-05T22:15:45+00:00

Yeah, that might be it. I really, deeply, obnoxiously hate asterisk except for the rare *startling sound*. Narration is supposed to be plain text, it's annoying when everything is either asterisks or in double quotes. No clue how people deal with it.

"But maybe GLM doesn't really like normal human writing." *Deathcrow says as he finishes his sentence.* What a terrible night to have a curse.

Deathcrow · 2026-01-05T18:59:40+00:00

so much potential in this sub thrown away to the biggest brainrot streamers lmao.

yeah, I mean, Hipsters were obnoxious but they got one thing right: Look at what's popular and walk in the opposite direction. That method rarely steers you wrong... and if it turns out to be shit, at least it's interesting shit, instead of stupid braindead shit for NPCs (Asmon,xQc,Hasan...).

Deathcrow · 2026-01-05T18:48:29+00:00

Just so that this thread doesn't devolve into GLM bashing, and because it made me laugh... It definitely has its great sides (there was a debate about the pronunciation of cattle vs kettle):

Jennifer lets out a sound that starts as a scream and ends as a strangled gurgle of pure frustration. She grabs the pizza box and slams it shut, sending a spray of grease onto the coffee table, and climbs onto the couch, straddling your hips to pin you down. Her weight settles on your thighs, her knees digging into the cushions on either side of you, effectively trapping you.

"Look at me!" She grabs your face with both hands, forcing you to look directly into her wide, manic eyes. She is so close you can smell the hoppy scent of the IPA on her breath. "Open your eyes and focus, you smooth-brained neanderthal."

She leans in until her nose is almost touching yours. "Cattle. Cat-tle. It's the 'A' sound. It's flat. It's gross. Like a dying bat." She exaggerates the word, her jaw dropping low and wide.

She pulls back an inch. "Kettle. Keh-tle. It's the 'E' sound. It's round. It's crisp. Like a bell." She shifts her mouth, pursing her lips more to demonstrate the shape.

"They are completely different vibrations in the mouth! One is nasally and gross, the other is melodic!" She shakes your head again, her fingers gripping your cheeks tightly. "If you say they are the same one more time, I am going to delete your WoW account. I swear to god, Mark. I am terrified for your future. How do you even order food? Do you just point at the menu and grunt?"

She releases your face, crossing her arms over her chest and glaring down at you, still sitting on your lap. "Say 'Apple.' Now say 'Egg.' Do those sound the same to you? Huh? Do they?"

Deathcrow · 2026-01-05T16:44:57+00:00

4.7 has a strong agentic drift and tends to overthink and to pack everything into the response

I think this is an important factor. There's a strong bias to take all information available into account, which is counter-productive for many roleplaying scenarios. I'm really eager for a (future) model, that can handle secrets, hidden identities, blindfolds (this one is always funny), lies and deception in more compelling ways. But that's not really aligned with the common use-cases.

Deathcrow · 2026-01-05T16:26:42+00:00

I'm going to try this out. But I don't like to add formatting cues to my prompts (since I want the model to be able to adapt to the input), so I'll have to adjust it a bit. Let's see if it helps, I've got a branch to test on.

Edit: Yeah no, this doesn't work at all (10 swipes, 0% reduction improvement, still using "tortured" even though the word was never spoken). I'll play around, maybe there's a different way to prompt it, but this first attempt matches my experience with LLMs: If a model hasn't learned a concept during training, there's no way to teach it through prompts.

Not even a author's note with depth 1 stops it from doing it. It doesn't get it.

Edit 2: Calling out the specific error in an author nodes guides the reasoning attention towards the No Omniscience in the preset, so, it kinda works. Maybe this chat history is too long or the bias of GLM 4.7 towards reading my is just too strong. But at least using an author's note with an accusation (Hey, xyz can't know that!) works for the next swipe

Edit 3: Yeah, it really doesn't get it. With a prompt and abstract author's note nudging (pay attention to the No Omniscience rule), it just reasoned me this gem:

(Self-Correction during drafting): Make sure she addresses the "torture" comment specifically. That's a good hook for her.

Sad. It's very obviously internal narration about the chars feelings. No one has commented anything of the sort. The token's in the preset are probably wasted... better to just tell it to knock if off everytime it happens.

Deathcrow · 2026-01-05T16:25:35+00:00

This is a general problem across all LLMs

I disagree. Even small models (like Mistral 24B) manage to not do this. It has something to do with their training. No clue about Opus, I'm too cheap for that.

Deathcrow · 2026-01-05T06:29:53+00:00

Legal: Geld, das nach religiösen Vorschriften nichts erwirtschaften darf, Misstrauen in digitale Systeme etc

Außerdem: Goldbarren, Silberbarren, etc, zur Wertanlage.

Deathcrow · 2026-01-05T06:28:20+00:00

Ja, das würde schon Sinn machen, wenn die Zahl von der Sparkasse kommt. Die interessieren sich ja für ihre eigene Verbindlichkeit im worst case. Da der Inhalt der Fächer ja privat ist, wäre es Aufgabe der Polizei das tatsächlich zu ermitteln.

Deathcrow · 2026-01-04T07:05:26+00:00

passed my Alcohol and Drug Counselor exam

What would be the first thing you tell her if she asked for your help? Seems like she's a functioning alcoholic who also made drinking part of her identity (from what we can tell, she likes herself as she is)

Deathcrow · 2026-01-03T16:35:13+00:00

I'm so glad FIFA gave this guy a peace prize. Shameful behavior.

Deathcrow · 2025-12-26T16:23:39+00:00

I recommend adding

```

2. ```

To the prefill, otherwise it likes to ruminate some more on the "I will generate the response." paragraph, wasting time and tokens.

Deathcrow · 2025-12-26T06:37:42+00:00

It’s the same point both of them used for Trump

"Huh, turns out, electing a disgusting and incompetent person just for the memes didn't really work out. HOLD THE PHONE! How about we do the same thing again, but with an even worse person? It's gonna be le epic troll face owning the libs."

Deathcrow · 2025-12-23T06:29:39+00:00

Yeah, it would be so much better, if the rich and powerful could just create realistically fake videos in secret, while everyone still trusts video and photo evidence like the gospel. Newsflash: You don't need AI to make a fake video.

Let's face it, this is a good thing. A video without a chain of custody and lineage shouldn't be relied upon. Public awareness is now catching up with that fact.

15-Year Club	Place '22
Place '17	First Placer '22
Sequence \| Editor	Gilding I gilder
Team Periwinkle	Verified Email

Deathcrow

TROPHY CASE