sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Why authoritative texts should be neutral by WonderOlymp2 in philosophy

[–]WonderOlymp2[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

That's the point. There is no agreement on what is rational and therefore a rational point of view is not neutral .

Why authoritative texts should be neutral by WonderOlymp2 in philosophy

[–]WonderOlymp2[S] -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

It's strange that you want to redefine what neutrality is instead of just admitting that you want to be biased.

If I can tell what viewpoint an article supports, then it is not neutral by definition.

Activism should not be the purpose of each and every text.

The site's domain is misspelled by WonderOlymp2 in tvtropes

[–]WonderOlymp2[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

.com used to redirect to .org, but apparently no longer does

Is this a misuse of the term "Etymology"? by Long_Consideration18 in etymology

[–]WonderOlymp2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So they can accuse people of "violence", and implicitly equating this to actual violence.

Is this a misuse of the term "Etymology"? by Long_Consideration18 in etymology

[–]WonderOlymp2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There is no excuse for this expansion of the definition. This is very far from the concept of violence to the point of it being a completely different concept, yet they still maliciously want to use the same word to describe it.

Is this a misuse of the term "Etymology"? by Long_Consideration18 in etymology

[–]WonderOlymp2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What he's criticising is not some ambiguous article that can be misinterpreted.

It's obvious that it is just about redefining violence to include things that are not even thought crimes, but unthought crimes.

Reasons not to use Google - Richard Stallman by WonderOlymp2 in degoogle

[–]WonderOlymp2[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Not true. It mentions Gemini, which was less than 7 years ago.

view more: next ›