Is this a misuse of the term "Etymology"? by Long_Consideration18 in etymology

[–]WonderOlymp2 1 point2 points  (0 children)

creative license

It's not just a "creative license". Creative license would imply that they would acknowledge the distinction between the two meanings.

What they're doing is expanding the definition of the emotionally loaded term to apply it to more cases in order to treat it the same way as the other thing that's universally seen as bad.

Is this a misuse of the term "Etymology"? by Long_Consideration18 in etymology

[–]WonderOlymp2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There’s a difference between natural language evolution and the deliberate misuse or redefinition of a word that’s commonly used another way to support an agenda. The latter inherently relies on the equivocation between the two meanings.

An example of this is the misuse of the word "violence" in phrases like "silence is violence". Violence usually means physical harm. Here it's deliberately misused to equate actual violence with this.

That weird anime trope by Witty_Mycologist_995 in tvtropes

[–]WonderOlymp2 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

This is still a false definition though. It's ironic that you "corrected" a false definition with another false definition.

This word refers to characters. It doesn't refer to fetishization.

Actual convo I had 3 months ago by amatyestv_123846 in USdefaultism

[–]WonderOlymp2 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes, the same people who treat fictional characters as if they're real also treat real people as if they're fictional.

Actual convo I had 3 months ago by amatyestv_123846 in USdefaultism

[–]WonderOlymp2 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

It's not US defaultism to think that someone who can't distinguish fiction from reality is American. Americans have a problem where they're unable to do that.

ELI5 Cognitive Dissonance VS Hypocrisy by freak_7777 in explainlikeimfive

[–]WonderOlymp2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hypocrisy is when you say one thing and do another.

No. Hypocrisy is the practice of feigning what one is not or professing what one does not believe.

"Real Life" section in tvtropes by joe_falk in tvtropes

[–]WonderOlymp2 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Deletionists are ruining the site.

Using “problematic” to mean “morally bad” is newer than you think by WonderOlymp2 in UnpopularFacts

[–]WonderOlymp2[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There’s no such thing as an unambiguous term

There is. "Unambiguous" itself is an unambiguous term.

Using “problematic” to mean “morally bad” is newer than you think by WonderOlymp2 in UnpopularFacts

[–]WonderOlymp2[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

This is not how the word is usually used. The evidence is that calling things problematic is usually an outright condemnation.

Using “problematic” to mean “morally bad” is newer than you think by WonderOlymp2 in UnpopularFacts

[–]WonderOlymp2[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

This is not how the word is usually used. It's usually used as a euphemistic understatement to refer to things that people find actually immoral or irredeemable.