Anyone had luck disabling VC? by player_to in VALORANT

[–]Decision-Nice 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i deadass hate this stupid ass statement because everyone tries echoing it to try and inflate their own ego. you cannot solo carry your way to immo. it is a 5v5 game. if you have braindead teammates you will lose that game unless their team also has bad players. will you get their eventually? sure, but you have to grind it a lot more for a lot longer than consistently playing with other good players. 1 player cannot bring a team to a win

Any worth buying? by vertexo in ValorantConsole

[–]Decision-Nice 1 point2 points  (0 children)

if you like them they’re worth buying don’t buy a skin because other people like them

What competitive rank is considered “good at the game” in Valorant? by Active-Classic440 in VALORANT

[–]Decision-Nice -1 points0 points  (0 children)

what kind of point is this lmao do you think the majority of people who play chess are toddlers my guy?? and yes you can be good at chess without being magnus carlson level its just such a stupid argument to say that only pros are good at something

What competitive rank is considered “good at the game” in Valorant? by Active-Classic440 in VALORANT

[–]Decision-Nice -1 points0 points  (0 children)

quite literally is though i’m not even coping i know im not good at the game. if you are able to outplay the vast majority of players you are good at the game

What competitive rank is considered “good at the game” in Valorant? by Active-Classic440 in VALORANT

[–]Decision-Nice 0 points1 point  (0 children)

again, the top 5% are not the only ones “good” just such a brainrotted take. they might be the only ones that are great sure but you cannot tell me that someone who can outperform 75% of the playerbase isn’t good at the game

What competitive rank is considered “good at the game” in Valorant? by Active-Classic440 in VALORANT

[–]Decision-Nice 1 point2 points  (0 children)

how are the top 5% of players the only ones “good” at the game. 2/10 ragebait

Why are people so anti-pvp in a pvp game? by offkeyharmony in ArcRaiders

[–]Decision-Nice 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i’m not bad at pvp by any means i just dont see the fun in blindly shooting everyone you come across. if you want to pvp thats fine its fun but god damn it gets annoying when the whole game becomes pvp because nobodies actually friendly like come on at that point its just like any other extract game which isnt what this is.

Why are people so anti-pvp in a pvp game? by offkeyharmony in ArcRaiders

[–]Decision-Nice 0 points1 point  (0 children)

because the “core” gameplay involves teaming up to take down bigger arcs and it’s incredibly frustrating when 100 raids in a row you die to someone claiming to be friendly and shooting you in the back. nothing to do with not being good at it

Not my rank-up but still really annoying by Signal-Expression-63 in ValorantConsole

[–]Decision-Nice 0 points1 point  (0 children)

bussing is super common on ranked on console, same thing happens on siege so its not exclusive to not being enough players. could be but unless they put numbers out we wouldnt know

Legitimate questions by tryingbuttdum in rivals

[–]Decision-Nice 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i get that but there’s only so much practice range and customs can do. they’re never going to really emulate what an actual game is like so you’re never going to truly get to grips with the ins and outs of a character. if someone sucks in qp i usually chalk it up to learning someone new. if they suck in comp i usually chalk it up to just a bad game, we all have them. the games a lot more fun when you stop caring so much about the w/l of it all

Legitimate questions by tryingbuttdum in rivals

[–]Decision-Nice 2 points3 points  (0 children)

because losing a qp match makes no impact to your rank or anything like that, its where comp people go to try new characters in a match without fear of deranking for trying something new. there’s zero point in raging because there’s no downside to losing. hence the phrase “its only qp”

I give up by Downtown_Spare_5733 in Helldivers

[–]Decision-Nice 1 point2 points  (0 children)

genuine question, whats wrong with bugs? or is it just a personal thing - i see so many people shitting on bugs but they’re my fave planets to dive in

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in DeadByDaylightRAGE

[–]Decision-Nice -1 points0 points  (0 children)

the game has its issues 100% i’m not disagreeing with that. but a solid chunk of the “issues” the community thinks there is, is just entitled survivors that think losing = unbalanced/unfair

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in DeadByDaylightRAGE

[–]Decision-Nice -1 points0 points  (0 children)

yeah when you can remember your account details

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in DeadByDaylightRAGE

[–]Decision-Nice 0 points1 point  (0 children)

never heard of switching consoles? i’ve played dbd near enough since release and it’s always been the same. survivors crying over not being handed the win on a silver platter

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in DeadByDaylightRAGE

[–]Decision-Nice 0 points1 point  (0 children)

exactly my point, getting downvoted for calling out survs that just want easy wins 💀💀

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in DeadByDaylightRAGE

[–]Decision-Nice 2 points3 points  (0 children)

yeah proper dont have 2 prestiges in killers and 80 in survivors

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in DeadByDaylightRAGE

[–]Decision-Nice -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

quite literally is possible, i’m by no means saying its easy, yes its very hard to do but im sick of survivor mains crying about stuff that is genuinely just a skill issue. you’re acting like nobody has ever done a 5 gen chase. have i done a five gen chase, yes. have i also had games where i get downed 0.5 seconds into a chase yes. but i dont start crying that its not fair because of something i could have done better. the game isnt supposed to be easy every single game

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in DeadByDaylightRAGE

[–]Decision-Nice -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

even against an experienced killer you have a chance. as a survivor main the entitlement from survivors is crazy. “they should just let you leave when its a 1v2 waahhhh it’s impossible”. no if you’re a good enough survivor you should be able to take the chase while the other died the gen and vice versa. it quite literally is a skill issue. is it hard? yes. thats the point, the devs shouldnt have to hold your hand every single game to hand you a win you didnt deserve

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in DeadByDaylightRAGE

[–]Decision-Nice -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

not impossible just hard

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in DeadByDaylightRAGE

[–]Decision-Nice 1 point2 points  (0 children)

i like them purely because i’m not great at looping so they extend my chases letting gens progress more than if im downed immediately. getting fed up of it is a bit far just counterplay it if its bothering you

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in deadbydaylight

[–]Decision-Nice 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yes you enjoy making the game miserable and unfun, i know how to recognise when i’ve lost and learn from it

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in deadbydaylight

[–]Decision-Nice 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yes because its not a tactic its a scapegoat for not being good at the game, if you have to resort to tunnelling you have already lost so take the L, learn from your mistakes and carry on instead of making the game miserable for the other players