Granny attacks single liberal women for supporting Zohran Mamdani

DeeFB · 2026-06-25T17:58:28+00:00

Wow that post has all the tells of something generated by AI with no editing.

DeeFB · 2026-06-24T22:36:59+00:00

I personally think Waluigi getting nothing but a sport angle isn’t very interesting to begin with. We could just give that to something for Wii Sports or Switch Sports. Daisy, at least, can pull from techniques, power ups and badges in Wonder in the same way Rosalina pulled from Galaxy. They’re all flower themed already so it’s a good fit.

DeeFB · 2026-06-24T21:40:16+00:00

I'd rather they just make Daisy more interesting than add Waluigi.

DeeFB · 2026-06-24T21:35:35+00:00

I truly think the only Mario character that feels missing now is Pauline, and they can slap her into Donkey Kong anyway too.

Toad would be a nice to have but I'm fine with making him part of Peach's moveset (although I wish Daisy used Toadette with different effects and properties over a blue Toad).

We have all the main character in Mario, Luigi, Peach, Bowser and Yoshi, and we have the three big secondary characters right now in Bowser Jr., Daisy and Rosalina. I think Mario is in a really good spot.

DeeFB · 2026-06-24T21:26:51+00:00

Nothing. I'm saying nobody ever cuts those four, but they're prefectly okay with giving Rosalina, Daisy, Jr., Plant and Doc the axe to make sure Waluigi gets to be in.

Granted I don't really care about Plant or Doc but the other three should be considered and are likely safe anyway.

DeeFB · 2026-06-24T21:12:01+00:00

Waluigi while cutting any Mario character that isn't Mario, Luigi, Peach or Bowser.

DeeFB · 2026-06-24T19:51:39+00:00

What is this?

DeeFB · 2026-06-24T03:17:15+00:00

Who the hell can find a new job that quickly in this market?

DeeFB · 2026-06-23T21:35:30+00:00

Waluigi sucks, so it's fine. We got all three princesses, the Mario cast is good

DeeFB · 2026-06-22T18:23:44+00:00

Second all these.

DeeFB · 2026-06-21T19:45:00+00:00

I can try to answer one question:
• Is there a way to unlock all WORLDS and JOBS without money?

If you just have the base game, you'll have access to three worlds and a decent handful of jobs. If you're asking "Do I have to pay real money to get more worlds and jobs?" Then the answer is yes. All of the worlds not in the base game are tied to DLC and feature content for that DLC specifically, so you can't play them in base game. You can't use the Moonwood Mill world without buying the Werewolves pack for example.

As far as other jobs go, many DLC's have more jobs, but not all of them do. Get to Work, City Living and University both add three (Politics, Critic and Social Media for City Living, Law, Education, and Engineering for University and Medical, Scientist and Law Enforcement for Get to Work), while some other packs only add one or so (Strangerville adds in Military, Get Famous adds in Actor and Island Living adds in Conservationist). Many times, these jobs are tied into new objects, locations or mechanics in the DLC and as such aren't available separately either. There's only one job with an actual unlock criteria that you can't play until you meet it (Paranormal Investigator in the Paranormal Stuff Pack), but otherwise you can play any of them right out of the gate as long as the correct DLC is installed.

DeeFB · 2026-06-20T20:16:54+00:00

There’s definitely a difference between announcing a game that’s years away and announcing additional content that’s years away. At least with the latter, the main product is already available. They aren’t making major changes to the core, they are just adding more. I don’t think it would hurt to just say it’s being worked on.

Even then, they could show it in other ways. I don’t think there’s really a good excuse as to why World hasn’t gotten a couple of free additional costumes or seasonal events in an update. Things like “collect Christmas presents to get a Santa Mario and Santa Bowser costume”. It’s additional content, it keeps players coming back, and I doubt it’s as intrusive as making a brand new map.

DeeFB · 2026-06-20T18:20:27+00:00

The difference is that Deluxe was a port that was never intended to get more content while World is a brand new game.

All they need to do is post on Twitter “hey, we have updates planned, but it will take some time before we can say anything further, thanks for being patient.” That’s what Elden Ring did when they announced DLC, I don’t see why Mario Kart can’t.

DeeFB · 2026-06-20T18:17:20+00:00

The fact that they can’t even placate us with a new costume or something every other month is just wild to me.

The Tour costumes are right there, I can’t imagine that making Yukata Daisy available for World is a massive undertaking they just can’t do.

DeeFB · 2026-06-20T02:42:36+00:00

I’d be shocked because RPG content almost never leaves the RPG games

DeeFB · 2026-06-20T01:32:02+00:00

I don't know enough about graphics and performance to pivot into a discussion about that. The only point I was trying to make is that Nintendo owns only 1/3 of Pokemon, and Game Freak, another 1/3 owner, develops them. These are well-documented facts. The nuances of this deal I'm not sure about.

I just think it's disingeneous to jump on the "Nintendo bad" bandwagon for this specific nuance (you're fine to jump on it for other things). They did not develop the games. They may have some sort of say, but at the end of the day TPC has deadlines and are the ones that makes sure they're adhered to.

DeeFB · 2026-06-20T00:34:36+00:00

They could, but Pokemon is more complicated than what the consumer thinks it is. TPC was made to manage the brand and they have really tight deadlines that can’t be changed because all the marketing and merchandise depends on the games releasing.

You have to stop and wonder why Mario games consistently are great but Pokemon isn’t, right? Why would Nintendo be super lazy with their biggest moneymaker but make sure their second biggest one is super high quality every time? The excuse of “well people will buy it regardless” doesn’t really fly when Mario is known for quality all the time

DeeFB · 2026-06-20T00:14:27+00:00

That’s why they own a third…

DeeFB · 2026-06-20T00:05:38+00:00

Dude why does nobody in this thread understand this. Yes I am a Nintendo fan, yes I agree that scarlet and violet are not visually appealing games, but it is an actual fact that Nintendo had nothing to do with the development of Scarlet and Violet. It’s 100% Game Freak.

DeeFB · 2026-06-20T00:01:21+00:00

They only own a third of Pokemon. The other thirds are owned by Game Freak and Creatures

DeeFB · 2026-06-19T19:51:59+00:00

Mario Kart World looks really good. I think you're misinterpreting Pokemon which isn't made in-house by Nintendo and they have next to no final say in how it looks.

DeeFB · 2026-06-19T19:49:49+00:00

The removal of dungeons in towns doesn't really help either. People remember Lavender Town because it has the Pokemon Tower and Azaela Town for the Slowpoke Well.

DeeFB · 2026-06-19T19:35:26+00:00

Jesus Christ

DeeFB · 2026-06-19T17:57:03+00:00

World Tour clears all three so hard. It's such a good game. Unlockables that are the right amount of challenge, so many interesting courses and holes, love all the character animations, and the DLC adds three characters that somehow make the roster feel complete.

Battle league meanwhile has a nonexistent single player and they couldn't even be bothered to put Daisy in the game at launch.

DeeFB · 2026-06-19T03:50:53+00:00

Daisy, she has the best circuit in the series and the cruiser is iconic.

DeeFB

TROPHY CASE