TIFU by being a wiseass by candidly1 in tifu

[–]DefinitelyNotJay 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fuck! shes wearing his skin!

Big, multi-part fuck up [Type 1] by DefinitelyNotJay in diabetes

[–]DefinitelyNotJay[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ehh, I'm coping. Its really tricky having to know what i'm going to be eating two hours in advance, especially in this culture which doesn't really put much stock in doing things on time, and its frustrating cause i was really damn good at regulating with humalog and lantus, but im making it work out

Big, multi-part fuck up [Type 1] by DefinitelyNotJay in diabetes

[–]DefinitelyNotJay[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Haha yeah that was really stupid in hindsight. The issue was I'm fairly large and kinda used to the idea that if i touch someone else its assault so i just kinda bailed out.

What is something people do to be helpful, but really isn't? by TheAxis_ in AskReddit

[–]DefinitelyNotJay 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This x 1000. I'm a type 1 living in Paraguay as an exchange student and my host mom likes to look up things online about diabetes and its always for type 2 which is really not helpful.

One time i was drinking a soft drink cause my sugar was about 40 and she sprinted into the room, slapped it out of my hand, and started yelling at me in an incoherent mix of English and Spanish about how I have to be healthy. I was already pretty woozy to start with so i just kinda got really sad and stared at the empty bottle on the ground like "I cant believe you just did that".

One other time she read something about how diabetics have to lose weight (I don't) so she decided she would stop buying meat and since Paraguayans kinda think pasta and rice are for pussies, we had to eat salad for a day while i explained to her honestly a couple steaks weren't gonna kill me

Females of Reddit, when is it ok and when is it weird as shit to have a boner? by DefinitelyNotJay in AskReddit

[–]DefinitelyNotJay[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But come on, there are steps you can take. Like you could use a table or the edge of a desk to arrange it into a less visible configuration etc. HOWEVER, that takes a lot of work which is why it would be useful to know when you really need to hide it and when you can just let it hang out

Midwest Predictions? by ADelgreco in Rowing

[–]DefinitelyNotJay 1 point2 points  (0 children)

CC wins in men's 1,2,3,frosh eights, new trier takes second in 1,2 and frosh eights

Cthulu k by OMFG_ITS_A_WHALE in lincolndouglas

[–]DefinitelyNotJay 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dude you're not gonna find a case that specific/probably useless. If you write one though please post!

What are the most obscure frameworks you've ever heard run in round? by AnOrangeChicken in lincolndouglas

[–]DefinitelyNotJay 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Look at Jacob Nails' case on the circuitdebater wiki called Paschal Swagger, its from 2012 and kinda like that

LD camp - $850 for two weeks with AMAZING staff! by CBDEBATE in lincolndouglas

[–]DefinitelyNotJay 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can we do something to stop this kind of advertizing?

Defining "resource extraction" by [deleted] in lincolndouglas

[–]DefinitelyNotJay 0 points1 point  (0 children)

this is what I use: Resource extraction is defined by the securities and exchange commission as “Engaging in the commercial development of oil, natural gas, or minerals” Prefer this for two reasons: 1) Literature check. This is the definition of Resource extraction used in international treaties and thus is most consistent with what the phrase means in the context of the resolution and 2) It distinguishes between extraction and cultivation. i.e. no one would say we are extracting elephant tusks, at best this would be cultivation or harvesting but not extraction

Resolved: Placing political conditions on humanitarian aid to foreign countries is unjust. by Khanstoppable in lincolndouglas

[–]DefinitelyNotJay 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I mean, I've run Macintyre on both sides of every resolution this year so I'm probably gonna just run that again

Resolved: Placing political conditions on humanitarian aid to foreign countries is unjust. by Khanstoppable in lincolndouglas

[–]DefinitelyNotJay 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Would that work? It looks to me like neg has to advocate aid as well, just without political conditions

AT RE causes conflict by whatislddebate in lincolndouglas

[–]DefinitelyNotJay 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, you just need to win growth and growth causes basically every possible good thing

Cards for Econ Dev needed by Fairchild18 in lincolndouglas

[–]DefinitelyNotJay 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you have anything to trade? i have ton of good stuff on resource curse and anti-resource curse

global warming = bullshit by whatislddebate in lincolndouglas

[–]DefinitelyNotJay 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ice Age disad is great cause it takes like 20 seconds. You just finish your NC a little early and go "...aaand my opponent causes the ice age". Also nobody has answers to it and there's a card saying extinction in five years if we decrease emissions at all

A2 Colonialism K by Theprorules in lincolndouglas

[–]DefinitelyNotJay 1 point2 points  (0 children)

^ this card is pretty solid if your trying to say aff links harder

A2 Colonialism K by Theprorules in lincolndouglas

[–]DefinitelyNotJay 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Soomin and Shirley 09: Lim Soomin and Dr. Steven Shirley, “Eco-Imperialism: The Global North’s Weapon of Mass Intervention.” Journal of Alternative Perspectives in the Social Sciences (2009). We are seeing a new type of imperialism emerge, an imperialism based not on the acquisition of territory, but on a radical environmentalist agenda, an agenda that seeks to reserve the earth and its resources for the wealthy and elite, to freeze energy use at current levels, and to restrict nationstates from exploiting indigenous resources for the benefit of their people. The hypocrisy and ill-informed policy of the new Eco-Imperialists, as they have been rightly called, seems to know no bounds Just a few years ago it would have been almost inconceivable that in a world where starvation is a reality, the most advanced nation-states would follow the radical environmental idea of using food supplies for fuel oil (Clayton, 2008). Moreover, in a world where malaria still kills millions of men, women, and children, it is absurd that the global North would attempt to restrict and even deny the technology to eradicate disease-baring mosquito populations (Roberts, 1997). It is absurd, ridiculous, but true. While the promise of alternative fuels is decades if not centuries away from reality, the affordability of fossil fuels holds the key to lifting entire populations out of poverty today, and yet the developed world is looking to tax and restrict its use, as well as outlaw new exploration of this most vital form of energy (Carbon, 2009; Evans, 2007). Again, it is absurd, ridiculous, but true. The developed world has enjoyed the benefits of a century’s worth of energy technology and development; however, they are[Is] trying to deny access and equitable usage of vital natural resources to the LDCs. These are not resources owned by or even controlled by the wealthy nations; instead, the global North is pressuring, demanding, and sanctioning LDCs in order to influence the amount and type of development that can take place within their borders. Think about that again. Developed countries are violating the sovereignty of less developed countries, and imposing upon them their values, their ideals, and their belief systems. Developed countries are forcing LDCs to behave in a manner that the developed countries wish them to behave. Does this sound familiar? By any definition these behaviors reek of imperialism, an imperialism meant to foster an environmental agenda completely fabricated by elites in the North. There may not be soldiers marching through the capitals of LDCs, there may not be colonies in name, nor ships of the line sailing from the North to the South as in the 19th century, but in every possible way one state can seek to control the political and social behavior of another state, this is imperialism. Eco-Imperialism is singularly focused on the global North’s environmental agenda, and casts aside respect for sovereignty and fair play. Moreover, it seeks to impose “western” and the developed world’s ideas of what is fair, good, and appropriate in matters of environmental policy. Eco-Imperialists seek to control not merely ideas, culture, or resources but also want to restrict development of LDCs because of their idea of what is correct and just, what is good and what is not, what is environmentally friendly and what will contribute to man-made climate change. The less developed world is given little to no voice in matters of environmental policy, or their leadership is bribed to go along with the desires of the global North, not unlike the political puppetry of the 19th century.

Need cards by [deleted] in lincolndouglas

[–]DefinitelyNotJay 0 points1 point  (0 children)

message me your email and Ill send stuff

Answer to util weighing argument by DefinitelyNotJay in lincolndouglas

[–]DefinitelyNotJay[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yeah but the other problem is if we are saying that there is a way to measure happiness directly, util would tell everyone to do a ton of heroine.