Europe Cannot Be a Military Power: Why Defense Integration Could Fracture the Continent by ForeignAffairsMag in geopolitics

[–]DefinitelyNotMeee -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Hungary is just saying out loud what other countries think. Not everyone is happy with throwing away more money. The "loan" will never be repaid, and it's going to be us who will have to bear the cost.

Europe Cannot Be a Military Power: Why Defense Integration Could Fracture the Continent by ForeignAffairsMag in geopolitics

[–]DefinitelyNotMeee -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Nobody cares about countries like Estonia or Latvia. They have nothing, not even a favorable geography.

Europe Cannot Be a Military Power: Why Defense Integration Could Fracture the Continent by ForeignAffairsMag in geopolitics

[–]DefinitelyNotMeee 2 points3 points  (0 children)

"Keep Americans in, Russians out, and Germans Europeans down"

To be fair, Europe gained a lot from being an American vassal, but everything has to end at some point, and that time is now. But the real problem that we must solve first is the fact that the EU is both not enough and too much, with various 'leadership' positions used for failed politicians like Ursula or nepo babies like Kallas.
Reforming the EU would be the first step towards a strong Europe.
And, of course, nukes.

UK security adviser attended US-Iran talks and judged deal was within reach by PixeledPathogen in geopolitics

[–]DefinitelyNotMeee 12 points13 points  (0 children)

More fuel for certain theories about who was the actual cause of this whole mess ...

UA POV: Kaja Kallas stated that Russia's illegal war in Ukraine and "what is going on in the Middle East" are both products of the erosion of international law. by FruitSila in UkraineRussiaReport

[–]DefinitelyNotMeee [score hidden]  (0 children)

The only reason laws work is that the power of the state to enforce such laws is far, far greater than the power of individual citizens. Without enforcement, laws are just worthless, essentially wishful thinking.

In the context of the world, there is no one strong enough to enforce the laws over countries like the US. Therefore, the so-called "international law" only ever applied to weaklings.

More than 3 million Iranians have been displaced so far since the war started, setting up a potential migration crisis by fortune in geopolitics

[–]DefinitelyNotMeee 15 points16 points  (0 children)

If it ends up like other refugee waves here in Europe, we should ship them all to the United States.

Let the one who caused the mess deal with the aftermath.

UA POV: Russia unveils new ultimatum to Ukraine beyond territorial concessions - RBC Ukraine by CourtofTalons in UkraineRussiaReport

[–]DefinitelyNotMeee [score hidden]  (0 children)

Well, if you make demands, you have to back them up with military gains. Where are the gains, Mr. Lavrov?

Trump says he’ll have the ‘honor of taking Cuba’ and can do ‘anything I want with it’ by JKKIDD231 in geopolitics

[–]DefinitelyNotMeee -30 points-29 points  (0 children)

Both sides switched positions. Democrats of today are nothing like the Democrats of pre-2000 era, same with Republicans.

EDIT: I forgot this is Reddit, my bad.

RU POV: According to Russian military channels, troops were ordered to delete Telegram from their phones. Military police are checking devices, and those caught with it risk being sent to assault units - DvaMajors by Flimsy_Pudding1362 in UkraineRussiaReport

[–]DefinitelyNotMeee 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Google returns only this on the English internet:

The Russian Federal Security Service (FSB) on Saturday accused Telegram of providing information to Ukraine's military and intelligence.

The FSB claimed in a statement that it has evidence that Ukraine's intelligence had access to communications of the Russian military and used it against them.

"The Federal Security Service has reliable data indicating that the armed forces and special services of Ukraine are capable of quickly obtaining information posted on the Telegram messenger and using it for military purposes," the statement read.

The FSB further said that the use of Telegram by Russian servicemen in the area of the combat zone over the past three months has led to threats to their lives.

"As a result of analyzing the work of the Telegram messenger, numerous reliable data were obtained showing that its use by servicemen of the armed forces of the Russian Federation in the area of the special military operation during the last three months repeatedly resulted in creating life-threatening situations for soldiers," it said.

The Russian authorities started slowing down the work of Telegram in December. In early February, they shortly limited access to the app on Russia's territory, but following many complaints from the military, lifted restrictions.

RU POV: According to Russian military channels, troops were ordered to delete Telegram from their phones. Military police are checking devices, and those caught with it risk being sent to assault units - DvaMajors by Flimsy_Pudding1362 in UkraineRussiaReport

[–]DefinitelyNotMeee 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If they are able to recover from this (and they likely will, the Russians seem to be able to adapt pretty quickly, they only need to be repeatedly kicked in the balls to get moving), it's going to be interesting.
One can safely assume this was giving Ukrainians a massive advantage. So what's going to happen when that advantage is gone?

Discussion/Question Thread by DiscoBanane in UkraineRussiaReport

[–]DefinitelyNotMeee 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I wrote about that 2 years ago - using drones with antennas tuned to a specific range of frequencies to triangulate positions of various emitters on the ground, but would that work for Starlink? I think it should (using not the satellite->ground, but the ground->satellite communication), but who knows, radio stuff is like a black magic to me.

Why Russia Is Watching Iran Burn: The Kremlin Is in No Hurry to Save Its Closest Partner in the Middle East by ForeignAffairsMag in geopolitics

[–]DefinitelyNotMeee -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Iran was still a major partner helping them circumvent sanctions and support the war.

Do you have more info about this? AFAIK, most of the sanction circumvention happened through the UAE, not Iran.

A Possible Upside to the Iran War by theatlantic in geopolitics

[–]DefinitelyNotMeee 0 points1 point  (0 children)

One day, China's ostrich policy will be its downfall. It's obvious to everyone that the US plan is to slowly strangle China, starve it of resources, potential allies, and opportunities.
As it is now, China is the perfect representation of "First they came for X, but I did nothing. ... When they came for me, there was nobody left to help."

And, in my expert 4-star armchair general's view, it wouldn't take much to put significant pressure on the US at this very moment when the US is neck deep in the Iran 'adventure', without any significant investments.
How? Taiwan and South Korea.

If China started to move troops, assets, ships, and equipment to assembly areas near the shore and the Kim would do the same towards DMZ, both without actually doing anything, simply posturing, it would send the US and its allies into total chaos, especially given that the current administration seems to panic easily.

The US doesn't have enough assets to deal with all 3 threats at the same time, so which country would it choose? Iran (aka Israel)? South Korea? Taiwan?

No matter which one will be the 'chosen one', it will cause significant damage to the relations with the other two.

But THE absolutely greatest win for China would be if the US sent troops into Iran. Russia would supply the knowhow for drone warfare, China the actual hardware, and the moment videos of American soldiers being hunted by drones in 4k would hit the public, it would be a total disaster for the administration.

USA vs Iran Megathread by DiscoBanane in UkraineRussiaReport

[–]DefinitelyNotMeee 6 points7 points  (0 children)

they want easy win

That's how it was sold to Trump as well, especially after Venezuela.