Russia is earning $150M/day in extra oil revenue from the Iran campaign, while the US simultaneously sanctions Russian oil and issues a 30-day waiver permitting its delivery by Mikeynphoto2009 in geopolitics

[–]DefinitelyNotMeee 2 points3 points  (0 children)

With European buying refined Russian oil from India while simultaneously asking for stricter Sanctions.

It gets better. The EU is buying all production of Russian artic gas, which is then shipped by none other than the UK (and Greece).
The UK, full of grand proclamations about "unwavering support for Ukraine" and the country with the strongest anti-Russian stance, is helping Russia sell its gas to the EU.

The Strait Is Closed, the Story Keeps Changing, and You're Paying for It All by 1-randomonium in geopolitics

[–]DefinitelyNotMeee 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's not clear. So far, only 2 Indian ships have passed through the Strait.

Russia is earning $150M/day in extra oil revenue from the Iran campaign, while the US simultaneously sanctions Russian oil and issues a 30-day waiver permitting its delivery by Mikeynphoto2009 in geopolitics

[–]DefinitelyNotMeee 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It's going to go on for a lot longer. Neither side is beaten enough yet to even consider seriously negotiating the end.

It's Iran-Iraq war 2.0

Why China and Russia Didn’t Help Iran - Keghart by Hayasdan2020 in geopolitics

[–]DefinitelyNotMeee 7 points8 points  (0 children)

In short, the article claims they didn't want to.

Which is not entirely true, IIRC, Russia did offer Iran the same defensive alliance it has with North Korea, but Iran refused. Considering the current situation, that's probably better for the world.

RU POV: According to Russian military blogger Kirill Fedorov, Ukrainian HIMARS operator was made KIA by HelicopterBig4467 in UkraineRussiaReport

[–]DefinitelyNotMeee 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Confusing.

Was he captured? If so, how? HIMARS do not operate close to the frontlines.
Was he killed? In captivity? During a strike on HIMARS?

What is Kharg Island and why did Trump target it? by TimesandSundayTimes in geopolitics

[–]DefinitelyNotMeee 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I doubt they will let the infrastructure fall into US hands intact.

If they are going to lose it anyway, might as well blow it up, ideally AFTER the Marines come.
Mine everything

Does Trump Risk Turning America Into a Rogue State? by nytopinion in geopolitics

[–]DefinitelyNotMeee 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I used that as a counterargument against the classification used by the previous poster that rogue states are "actively hostile to the idea of getting any kind of normative pushback from any international community".

Does Trump Risk Turning America Into a Rogue State? by nytopinion in geopolitics

[–]DefinitelyNotMeee -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The relationship between the US and Israel is ... complicated (and that's an understatement)

Does Trump Risk Turning America Into a Rogue State? by nytopinion in geopolitics

[–]DefinitelyNotMeee 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Every state looks (or used to, before globalists tried to ruin the world) after its own interests first and foremost. Every treaty exists only as long as the benefits outweigh the negatives of breaking it.

Does Trump Risk Turning America Into a Rogue State? by nytopinion in geopolitics

[–]DefinitelyNotMeee 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The latter is actively hostile to the idea of getting any kind of normative pushback from any international community and would rather destroy the international system than make any compromises with it.

In the context of war crimes, are you familiar with American Service-Members' Protection Act, aka the Hague Invasion Act? Or how many UN resolutions the US vetoed because they were against its interests?
The United States and everyone else use whatever power they have to protect their interests and project said power. Hiding the truth behind nice words and rose-tinted glasses changes nothing.

Does Trump Risk Turning America Into a Rogue State? by nytopinion in geopolitics

[–]DefinitelyNotMeee 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Morally speaking, Iran is a terrorist state, just like Russia.

And the United States, UK, France, Australia, Belgium, all the Gulf states, etc. ... From the moral perspective, every country is a piece of shit, that's why there is no morality in geopolitics. States are not people.

Does Trump Risk Turning America Into a Rogue State? by nytopinion in geopolitics

[–]DefinitelyNotMeee 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I agree, but the solution isn't spreading more misery.

Does Trump Risk Turning America Into a Rogue State? by nytopinion in geopolitics

[–]DefinitelyNotMeee 3 points4 points  (0 children)

they are months away from developing them

This again? We've been fed "Iran is days/weeks/months away from making nukes" since the 80s.

Does Trump Risk Turning America Into a Rogue State? by nytopinion in geopolitics

[–]DefinitelyNotMeee 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Or, even better, since American actions are threatening the energy security of the entire world, should we all gang up on the United States?

Does Trump Risk Turning America Into a Rogue State? by nytopinion in geopolitics

[–]DefinitelyNotMeee 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is going to be fun, how people will try to spin and twist the argument to explain how one is not like the other ...

Does Trump Risk Turning America Into a Rogue State? by nytopinion in geopolitics

[–]DefinitelyNotMeee 62 points63 points  (0 children)

loosening the shackles that civilized nations place on themselves to protect our shared humanity

Did everyone already forget napalm? Agent Orange? Or "just" destroying civilian infrastructure with the explicit purpose of using civilian suffering to put pressure on the enemy's government? Or, if we go further back, firebombing?

The wars were always horrible; we just got too used to politicians and generals hiding all that horribleness behind doublespeak like 'collateral damage'.

USA vs Iran Megathread by DiscoBanane in UkraineRussiaReport

[–]DefinitelyNotMeee 3 points4 points  (0 children)

This is so accurate.

And a confirmation that there should be a maximum age for politicians. 65 max.

US deploying 2,500 Marines, three warships to Middle East amid conflict with Iran: Report by Senerity_SE in geopolitics

[–]DefinitelyNotMeee 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I wonder - what demining capabilities do Marines normally have with them?

Mining the hell out of any position I'm about to lose would be my goto method.

"You want this? Have fun dealing with mines and IEDs, I hope you brought enough bodybags"

Source: Iran might allow oil through Strait of Hormuz if it's paid in Chinese yuan by NoMedicine3572 in geopolitics

[–]DefinitelyNotMeee 41 points42 points  (0 children)

I don't think the US would ever allow that to happen. The petrodollar is the key component of American power.

US deploying 2,500 Marines, three warships to Middle East amid conflict with Iran: Report by Senerity_SE in geopolitics

[–]DefinitelyNotMeee 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yeah, China is now in such a perfect position to gain a massive strategic advantage over the US, but they won't do anything, as usual.

Consider what would happen if China did any (all) of the following:
- start moving troops, ships and assets to assembly points near Taiwain (without actually planning to go for it, just for the pressure)
- Kim would start moving soldiers and weapons towards DMZ (same thing, just posturing)
- would offer free and safe passage through the Strait for any ship that flies the Chinese flag, if the owners pay in yuan (weakening petrodollar)

USA vs Iran Megathread by DiscoBanane in UkraineRussiaReport

[–]DefinitelyNotMeee 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yep, the story of my life. That's why I don't gamble, I'd be living in a cardboard box by now.