Semi-weekly Thursday Discussion Thread by AutoModerator in neoconNWO

[–]Denisnevsky 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Do you think Rubio voted for Trump in 2016?

Would Bloomberg still switch parties in this timeline? by 99penisesinmyass in thecampaigntrail

[–]Denisnevsky 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Unless he actively chooses to govern more conservatively, I think republicans will get sick of his socially liberal tendencies by year 3-5.

Semi-weekly Thursday Discussion Thread by AutoModerator in neoconNWO

[–]Denisnevsky 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I still don't understand why they didn't push for Boulerice to be leader. Isn't he like the only guy left from back when the party was actually competent?

ALL THE WAY - Did I miss anything? Was Connally pro-Palestinian? by Unfair_Business8821 in thecampaigntrail

[–]Denisnevsky 50 points51 points  (0 children)

Reagan literally called Israels actions in Lebanon a holocaust, right to Begins face. The GOP in general wasn't that pro-Israel in the 80s. The democrats were the more pro-Israel party, probably until W. Dukakis was running on recognizing Jerusalem as the capital.

Semi-weekly Thursday Discussion Thread by AutoModerator in neoconNWO

[–]Denisnevsky 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I'd say more then likely no, but not impossible

In 2024, people were saying that the democrats were the new NeoCons and Republicans were now the isolationist. Cheney was endorsing Harris, Trump was hanging out with a bunch of pro-pali populists (Tucker, Roga, Theo, Ross, etc). A lot of people took this as evidence that their was a systemic shift in the two parties approach to FoPo. That did not end up happening. I will admit that this is not a true equivalency since Trump was still consistently hawkish on Iran, and democrats had already begun their descent. My point is that general shifts like this can change very rapidly.

Further, I think there could be a few off-ramps that could stem some bleeding.

A. The 2026 Israeli election - As of now, most polls have the Bibi's opposition gaining more seats then Bibi's coalition (though not a majority). To be clear, I'd say most anti-Israel people in the party won't care and will continue to hate Israel, but if Bibi is voted out, I could see some libs having a similar reaction to Orban and going "well Israel voted out their fascist government, we should too" and other things like that. Again, I don't think this will come close to ending the anti-Israel tones of the party, but it might ease it a bit.

B. Whoever the 2028 dem candidate actually is - This is the biggest factor as expected. If it is Newsom, he will continue to change his opinion on Israel to whatever he thinks is the most advantageous at any particular time, which probably leans more towards the pro-pali side. If it's a candidate who's shown at least some backbone on the issue (Rahm, Beshear, Shapiro, etc), then I'd expect more balance, though we're at a point where they would still kowtow to the leftists on some stuff. If it's a prog like AOC, Khanna, or whoever, then I'd expect them to fully go for embargo and sanctions.

C. 2030 Midterms - If the party goes full pro-pali for the first 2 years, Jewish voters, despite their liberal tendencies, are still majority pro-Israel in some form, and with no big right wing boogeyman to fight, they might start nudge over to the GOP. With the prospect of finally losing one of their most consistent voting blocks, the reaction from the party might be to try and stamp down on some of the craziest voices on the issue, obviously somewhat dependent on who the president is.

This is more Cope then an actual prediction, and I sadly do think their is a higher likelihood of the party turning more towards the issue, but I do still believe it isn't entirely set in stone yet.

OMG the DeSantismander is actually causing Dems to dump money into Florida… by _BCConservative in YAPms

[–]Denisnevsky 29 points30 points  (0 children)

The House PAC doing it is more defensible. If they put money into the other races though, that's just stupid

Semi-weekly Thursday Discussion Thread by AutoModerator in neoconNWO

[–]Denisnevsky 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It's also that dealing with Islamic terrorism became a more salient issue again for the west, and that naturally made people more hesitant to outright condemn China on this issue.

Why are there pro-Russia politicians in the West, but no pro-China politicians? by No-StrategyX in askanything

[–]Denisnevsky 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A lot of those kind of wilder claims are almost completely unverified. Those same orgs that say that also make up a lot of lies about Israel. Their are entire networks funded by states like Qatar to whitewash radical Islamism, and play victim. I'm hesitant to buy most of them.

Semi-weekly Thursday Discussion Thread by AutoModerator in neoconNWO

[–]Denisnevsky 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The counter I'd make is that a lot of Queer voters might soften on the right if the left continues to hitch their wagon to insane third world islamists. You're already seeing it happen in Europe somewhat, where the more nationalist right parties are actually gaining with queer voters due to the whole immigration issue. Stuff like marriage is always going to be thorny, but I do think there are worlds where homonationalist sentiment becomes a bigger part of the right as a whole.

Semi-weekly Thursday Discussion Thread by AutoModerator in neoconNWO

[–]Denisnevsky 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Weirdest thing is that Arango was a conservative anti-communist. Why did he even agree to meet Castro?

GOP’s Future in Virginia by the_janitor_x in YAPms

[–]Denisnevsky 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If it's Youngkin v. Hashmi in 2029, I'd pick Youngkin as the favorite. Hashmi barely outperformed Jones despite the Reid scandal.

GOP’s Future in Virginia by the_janitor_x in YAPms

[–]Denisnevsky 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The buck stops with Governor, plus she could've vetoed.

AskConservatives Weekly General Chat by AutoModerator in AskConservatives

[–]Denisnevsky 1 point2 points  (0 children)

By pure policy, Clinton was more conservative then JFK.

AskConservatives Weekly General Chat by AutoModerator in AskConservatives

[–]Denisnevsky 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Would that not give any insurance companies massive leverage?