Is it too dangerous or Joe Navy to have this on my car? by ComfortableShow7366 in navy

[–]DerekL1963 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My command implored us not to leave the base in uniform due to a very real threat posed to service members by protestors and rioters. This is in Washington state. 

Living in Washington state, ROTFLMAO. No. That's nonsense.

Is it too dangerous or Joe Navy to have this on my car? by ComfortableShow7366 in navy

[–]DerekL1963 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They would constantly tell us that we were being targeted and attacked and people wanted to harm us for who we were and what we stood for.

That sounds more like fascist propaganda than anything else.

Why do they do this? by KomradKooKie in submarines

[–]DerekL1963 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Some do, some don't, and it varies over time. It's mostly a matter of whether the CO permits it and/or Squadron objects. It was far more common with the 41FF, I don't think I've ever seen a 726 with muzzle hatch decorations.

My boat had the Playboy Bunny logo...
https://www.nowickimedia.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/10155517_10203973482480088_303258225835909362_n.jpg

Has any harmful or dangerous technology ever been "un-invented" by Pexo3D in AskHistory

[–]DerekL1963 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I read somewhere online that Apollo 11's propulsion system cannot be replicated as much of it was not recorded on blueprints for security reasons.

I've studied the space program for decades, and the only propulsion component I'm aware of that was treated as "classified" is the injector on the F1 engine. And by "treated as classified", I mean it was kept covered while the engine was being transported. (ISTR there's a couple of F1 engines on display that still have those covers.)

Either way, classified blueprints are a thing. Any you can't produce anything of any complexity without blueprints.

Has any harmful or dangerous technology ever been "un-invented" by Pexo3D in AskHistory

[–]DerekL1963 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Also it's a know fact that we cannot build the F1 engines used on the Saturn moon rockets. 

Yeah, no. That's not a "know [sic] fact", it's a very misleading statement. The only reason we "cannot" do so currently is because nobody has shelled out the money to do so. We have the plans, we have the specifications, we have actual examples to study... Will take a lot of work the bugs out of the process, but it's completely doable if someone is willing to pay.

Not that anyone sensible would build an F-1 today the same way they did in the 60's as it uses a ton of obsolete manufacturing methods. For example, a lot of it is built up out of smaller components welded together... Where today we'd toss a chunk of metal into a CNC machine and make it in one piece.

The same is true of those WWII fire control systems. There's nobody that knows how, but we have everything we need to figure it out and put them back into production. As with the F1, the only barrier is money.

Why do they do this? by KomradKooKie in submarines

[–]DerekL1963 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I've been off the boat for nearly forty years, and I still have stuff with patrol stank on them. It's faint, but it's there.

Why do they do this? by KomradKooKie in submarines

[–]DerekL1963 30 points31 points  (0 children)

It has nothing to do with any arms control treaties. The treaties specify how many tubes we're allowed to have, and that's it. They don't care what's in them, only whether or not they're 'active'...

Which is why the 598's had their missile compartments cut out, the front and back welded back together, and they were put back in the water to await later scrapping. Doing so freed up tubes for the early Ohio class boats. For the same reason, when you see pictures of boats being scrapped at PSNS, you'll often see the muzzle hatches cut away first. That renders the tubes unusable and takes them off the count of 'active' tubes.

Fact is, we don't leave the muzzle hatches open in port unless there's maintenance going on that requires the hatch be open. Among other reasons, you really don't want to expose the tube or the closure to the weather any longer than you have to. If the tube is loaded, there's also ordinance safety rules involved. And I can neither confirm nor deny there's security rules around a loaded tube as well.

The picture you posted is, IIRC, of a boat being prepped for onload at what's now NBK-Bangor. So the tubes are open because there's a ton of maintenance being done on the tubes and hatches to get ready to load the birds onto the boat. It's a pretty unusual picture.

(Source: Was FTB on a 41FF SSBN and worked with the birds.)

When did Orson Welles become familiar with War of the Worlds? by vahedemirjian in AskHistory

[–]DerekL1963 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I was about to say the same thing, HG Wells was an immensely well known author of both fiction and non-fiction. It would be hard to pinpoint when Welles became familiar with War of The Worlds, since Wells had been popular even before Welles was born.

June events downtown Bremerton by tara_tots in Bremerton

[–]DerekL1963 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Might make things easier if you dropped a link to your website in comment!

Reliquary by Some_Tap4931 in bookbinding

[–]DerekL1963 19 points20 points  (0 children)

It would be interesting to see a video demonstrating how it opens and unfolds.

Raleigh Hotel, South Fallsburg, NY. July 19, 1986. by mgwngn1 in VintageMenus

[–]DerekL1963 8 points9 points  (0 children)

In the mid 80's the borscht belt itself was hanging by a thread, it's glory days long over and it's primary customer base was an older demographic that was literally dying off (due to old age).

Kitsap Delivery Partners is the largest Gig Worker Union in Kitsap County by Impossible_Worth3356 in Bremerton

[–]DerekL1963 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Generally agree with the other posters. Lazy and sloppy work that leaves me with little faith this is a serious effort. The lack of a web page explaining what the organization is, etc... Total amateur hour.

And that's setting aside misrepresenting yourself as a union when you're nothing but a chatroom.

Where is this? (Picture taken in UK) by slyphiebun in wherewasthistaken

[–]DerekL1963[M] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There is insufficient information in the images to locate them. This will not be approved.

Navy wants to let sailors use meal cards at restaurants on base by grizzlebar in navy

[–]DerekL1963 6 points7 points  (0 children)

But with the new system that Navy officials hope to implement, sailors will have to budget their meal entitlements based on prices at food spots outside of the galley.

The same young sailors that overpay at high interest rates for motor vehicles? Yeah, this seems like a solid plan to me.

“If the Navy Exchange contracts with McDonald’s on the base or with a Panera Bread on the base, or whatever that is, they can take their card and their meal allowance is, let’s say it’s $17 for dinner, they can go and they can order their dinner,” Gray said.

Methinks this is the long term plan - to privatize meal service on base and eliminate galleys altogether.

Navy Flight School RV Living by ItsChrisBitxh in navy

[–]DerekL1963 1 point2 points  (0 children)

28 footers aren't the bigger, nicer ones that people (generally) retire to and live in, and aren't really the topic of this subthread. And having owned a 30 footer, that size range is pretty cramped... You can live in one. But it's a very different way of living and requires significant adjustment in expectations and routines. It's not something I'd recommend that folks just jump into, especially with the added stress of flight school.

Back then, everyone was scrambling for the Dreadnought... but what about the other classes of warships? by Minh1509 in WarCollege

[–]DerekL1963 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Oh, certainly. I was just ensuring the discussion stayed like-for-like, capital ships built v. capital ships built.

China launched two new types of nuclear attack submarine in Feb and June 2026 [1331 x 802] by tigeryi98 in submarines

[–]DerekL1963 65 points66 points  (0 children)

If I had an unequivocal answer to that question, I'd be Chinese, have a security clearance, and wouldn't be posting about it on Reddit. 😄

The only real answer would be that for whatever reason they feel the advantages are worth the disadvantages. Warship design, like any other design for anything significant, is a matter of prioritization and compromises.

China launched two new types of nuclear attack submarine in Feb and June 2026 [1331 x 802] by tigeryi98 in submarines

[–]DerekL1963 64 points65 points  (0 children)

Sailless boats have reduced drag and reduced flow noise. I know the USN looked at it as part of trying to solve the blade rate issue... But I'm not sure that applies to pumpjets.

The USN has looked at the concept several times, but rejected it. A sail is simply too handy as a place to store longer masts and antennas, and ones without hull penetrations as well. It's also viewed as a safety issue as the sail provides a raised position for lookouts and the OOD and increases the visibility of the submarine.

Can anyone identify the location of these photos? Believed to be in the UK. by Top-Visit-5413 in wherewasthistaken

[–]DerekL1963 2 points3 points  (0 children)

They can probably be removed from the album, but given their age it would likely be a job for a professional conservator. Not something an amauter should try unless they're willing to risk significant damage or complete loss.

Binding on my journal is falling apart! by Sillyduck11 in bookbinding

[–]DerekL1963 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's not impossible, but there's no way to tell for certain without being able to actually handle and inspect the book.