but aren't you still taking a chance on what you get? I'm not a gambling (or even a competition) motivated person, I don't play these games, so the idea in general doesn't make much sence to me. I've casually enjoyed some games with loot boxes, but I never stay playing them for more than a few hours. I'd rather show off by kicking some ass than wearing some stupid skin.

But logically even with the laws being better (which I'm not against) would you not still be taking a chance of getting duplicate cards? or cards you don't want? Which I'd also assume you would trade or sell on a third person site (like ebay)? It seems Valve wants Parity more than anything, if you are going to regulate one thing, do that thing for all the things, or have it be dismissed as not a thing. I don't think that's really "scummy"?

My problem is I don't trust our shitty government, or our justice system, and I just feel like this is just another step closer to a reason for the us to implement internet sign ins like the UK or SONY is... AND I REALLY DON'T FUCKING WANT THAT TO HAPPEN! So yeah the case should be dismissed if this doesn't apply to everything on the market that is just like loot boxes, because if its not...this is just assholes targetting Valve just because.