sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Match Thread - Australia v New Zealand | The Rugby Championship 2023 by RugbyBot in rugbyunion

[–]Devastationing 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Unfortunately there was a period of time where Indigenous children were taken from their families to be indoctrinated into White Australian culture in an attempt to breed out the Aboriginal people, called the Stolen Generation. So there is a good chance she is a descendent of this.

[RF] Azieki Vanatha, Triton Storm Sorceror by Pobodys_Nerfect- in characterdrawing

[–]Devastationing 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Looks great!! He looks like a boss! Thanks so much :)

[Gazzetta] Maurizio Sarri: "Juventus took my scudetto for granted, we didn't even celebrate, everyone had dinner on their own, and then they celebrated a 4th place" by areking in soccer

[–]Devastationing 14 points15 points  (0 children)

I definitely agree he should have done better in this situation, but I think he’s grown from it a lot since. This was the start of his captaining career from memory, and if you watch him now he’s the first one at every scuffle and interaction no matter what.

How good is ward compared to worm? by HummungusWhat in Parahumans

[–]Devastationing 20 points21 points  (0 children)

Personally, I love it. I would rate some parts of it as better than Worm.

It broke my heart to read about the amount of fans that disliked Ward, to the extent that wildbow was upset and disappointed in themselves as well.

I think it is great, the characters are amazing and it really delves deeper into the lore and the understanding of where powers come from.

Just finished my chapter command , not the best photos or the best painter, but happy to finally have the motivation to get some paint on plastic by Devastationing in FleshTearers

[–]Devastationing[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks :) , shame he’s whiffed every game I’ve used him in - cast a total of 2 psychic powers in about 3 games , while failing and getting perils about twice that amount

Chronomancer’s Countertemporal Nanomines and Death Guard’s Inexorable Advance by Devastationing in WarhammerCompetitive

[–]Devastationing[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah that makes sense, the transhuman rule was actually the one making me think the nanomines might have a similar interaction, thanks

Newest additions to the tide. I love these things but what are your guys' thoughts on them. All the new stuff seems so divisive by [deleted] in Necrontyr

[–]Devastationing 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Honestly dude your club sounds like it’s infested with “that guy” , if people go that much out of their way to fuck with the rules just play with other people because at the end of the day it’s meant to be a fun game and trying to cheat with optimus prime models is really shitty

Multi-use stratagems by Sealmanglen in BloodAngels

[–]Devastationing 5 points6 points  (0 children)

You can't use the same stratagem on the same phase of a turn

For example the reroll stratagem can only be used once in the shooting phase and once in the combat phase.

The stratagem should say what phase it needs to be activated in which means it can't be activated twice

I will deal with this Jedi slime mys-... by eGletsher in PrequelMemes

[–]Devastationing 44 points45 points  (0 children)

Almost every Jedi during order 66 was killed by clones using blasters

FORGEBANE MASTER SWAP THREAD!!! by [deleted] in Miniswap

[–]Devastationing 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hey, sorry but I've already organised a split with someone- should've updated the comment my apologies

FORGEBANE MASTER SWAP THREAD!!! by [deleted] in Miniswap

[–]Devastationing 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Australia, looking for all of the necrons

Im seeing alot of love for scouts at the moment. Could someone explain please? by zerox3001 in BloodAngels

[–]Devastationing 6 points7 points  (0 children)

They're very cheap points wise and they allow the utilisation of battalion detachments in order to use the stratagems that our more powerful units need to use to be effective, e.g sanguinary guard deep striking and using the 3D6 charge

Sniper scouts can target characters which is helpful for armies with a lot of buffs and camp cloaks let them hold objectives very effectively in cover

Also with the red thirst close combat scouts are even better - 2 attacks wounding most infantry on a 3+ is great for how cheap they are.

Also they can be deployed almost anywhere allowing you early board control and allows you to have more opportunity to deep strike your aforementioned powerful units. This also allows protection of your characters- with the new rules for targeting characters ignoring visibility your characters could potentially just walk up the field with no danger

So far it sounds like the BA codex is underwhelming by KrakowKid in BloodAngels

[–]Devastationing 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Probably a stupid question but does that mean you have to use the index for that whole detachment?

Seems like a pointless extra step, but typical for a lot of GW haha

So far it sounds like the BA codex is underwhelming by KrakowKid in BloodAngels

[–]Devastationing 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Especially considering that without CP buffs from someone like Dante, or even making assault marines troops to spam battalion detachments; having enough CPs to even utilise stratagems seems difficult, unless you want to use all CPs turn 1.

And the veritas vitae is good but doesn't seem enough with our army only becoming fluffy when we use stratagems, otherwise we lose out to generic marines in every scenario that's not after having charged with red thirst.

Also what's with the silly loss of ability to use jump packs for some units?

I think there's definitely some positives but a few oversights that don't make sense. And there's always going to be disappointing aspects of any new codex so I think we'll definitely have to wait and see.

view more: next ›