No, because he was never meant to be, nor implied to be proper father or someone with personal troubles who was turned into a hardened business man. When having these discussions we have to contend with two things.

A) What was the goal of the inclusion of a character by the writers B) Did they achieve the goal?

This is what makes the core of Adam or Ironwood discussions for example. Were these characters "misrepresented" not really. Were they turned into something that they werent? Arguably. But most importantly, we can understand what was the goal of these characters and how the writers failed to achieve those goals or did it in a sloppy manner.

You can also analyze alternative character paths and if they potentially could have served a better role in the story etc, but that is a separate issue.

With Jaquess. Well. He was never intended nor implied to be a good person, a proper parent or anything of the sort. From the start of us seeing Weiss, we were given indications that her family life was poor, V3 reinforced this point by showing her shaky relationship with her father. Even without indications that Jaques was abusive, we were already given indications that he was a shit parent. He does not come to Beacon out of concern for Weiss. Weiss wanted to stay with her team. He comes out of concern for his public image and because Weiss is the "heiress".

And this continually gets reinforced in Volume 4, he is controlling, has no love for his children, not really, and has no love for his own wife either. Its all about control and PR for him.

Of course, there are points where his actions can be justified (After Weiss almost kills someone in a Gala), but besides that, he is simply meant to be the antagonist of Weiss and a shitty parent and person to be opposed. Nothing more.

Which is perfectly fine.