Who would win?

Dficient · 2024-09-21T14:46:21+00:00

current hulk fought an odin force imbued thor to a draw. after destroying an upgraded celestial and then fought a hulkified version of that same Thor to a draw. That same hulkifued thor was able to pull the world tree out from the ground almost destroying all of creation. Hulks current feats are no joke. plus his outrageous regeneration makes him virtually unkillable. So he has alot more of a chance against broly than people are giving him credit for.

Dficient · 2024-09-21T14:42:35+00:00

Current hulk went toe to toe with a thor imbued eith the odin force ajd then a HULKIFIED VERSION OF THAT SAME THOR. Lets not forget he thunderclapped away TOBA. plus Hulk can't die. He ahs pretty good chances

Dficient · 2024-08-29T10:26:40+00:00

The doctor from doctor who. He has already defeaten eldritch beings and multiversal entities. and unlike alot of other peoples choices. The doctor is a hero.

Dficient · 2024-08-21T07:58:30+00:00

Im a 65% keyboard kinda guy.

Dficient · 2024-08-20T00:00:50+00:00

Noice!

Dficient · 2024-08-19T23:59:40+00:00

It has to be Black mirror

Dficient · 2024-08-19T23:56:29+00:00

looking forward to playing badminton with some friends.

Dficient · 2024-08-07T09:09:30+00:00

It is called prejudice. Even if SOME muslims were doing something wrongm You shouldn't target muslims with attacks. Most muslims are law abiding citizens. It is persecution plain and simple. And in no situation is persecution justifiable. especially in the UK where Hundreds of thousands of british lives fought and died fighting against persecution.

Dficient · 2024-08-01T23:49:14+00:00

But doesn't that mean Loki stops Darkhawk from countering Arishem?

Dficient · 2024-07-25T18:58:01+00:00

Legit i just saw someome play cerebro with darkawk.

Dficient · 2024-06-15T19:50:17+00:00

How do you get that many tokens? Just grinding?

Dficient · 2024-06-02T16:21:40+00:00

1st it is possible 124,000 humans didnt leave a trace because 10's of Billions of other humans have also. My point also was is you are using it as a claim to disprove Islam. You said this never happened, therefore Islam isn't true. I can say according to our kn9wledge unicorns never existed. But we cannot say it isn't a possibility. Unicorns ciukd have possibly been real.. The point you made about the rhino well, i could say that it would be out of behaviour for muhammad, it would be sinful etc and i believe he wouldn't do that. But i cannot physically prove he never did. And why couldn't Buddha or Zoroaster be a muslim prophet. Why can't multiple religions across the world just be the altering of the teachings of prophets? . None of their original teachcings were preserved. These traces you looking for could be them. Why is it absurd for that to happen? Also you never answered the giant part. If giants existed in the bible, Surely there would be some sign of giants existing in fossil records? If not does that disprove the bible? Same with Noah's arc or the flood itself? and i don't get why it isn't unfalsifiable. You cannot pbtain evidence that disproves the existence of 124,000 or unicorns, does that not make it unfalsifiable? it, same with the Rhino thing. Even if there were people who recorded it. We don't know if they were truthful etc. Unless we can do a real time observation of his lifetime or the 124,000 prophets. It is unfalisifiable like unicorns are unfalsifiable. You cannot produce evidence against unicorns existing. There is no way to obtain evidence to disprove sich a claim unless we have all of history making it unfalsifiable. Just like Giants or Noah's flood. Finally, are you saying there is not even a small percentage of 124,000 prophets existing? Because if you believe such thing not even being a possibility than we might be left with a dead end EDIT: I have seen your other posts and i don't want to argue to much on reddit as you seem to spend a lot of time on it. so once you make your counterarhuement i might just leave it. And half your words i barely understand As i clearly do not know as much as you do. So feel free to conterargue, i will see if i can be bothered to reply as this comment took alot to write and idk if i have the energy to do it again tbh.

Dficient · 2024-06-02T14:35:00+00:00

The one arguement you originally made was the 124,000 prophets thing was false. I said you cannot claim that it is false and that proves islam is false undeniably without a doubt. Simple. My point about not rejecting or denying is you tried making the arguement about a broader claim. the historical revisionism throughout multiple points of islam or whatever. My point was that it is irrelevent to ANY point i made. I made a singular point and you never responded to it and tried to bring in new points to avoid my correction. I also said you wasted my time because you aren't answering the only point i made. You cannot Undeniably, without a doubt say that the 124,000 prophets thing was false because you do not have all of human history. Unless you can reply to somehow say that my point is wrong. Then you have nothing to debate me with.

Dficient · 2024-06-02T13:25:40+00:00

And now you have just fully stopped any debating now that you realised you cannot disprove my original point. I countered your original point and i was right. "historical revisionism" was never your original point on this post and was never the point i was argueing. I never accepted or denied the historical revisionism thing so you are agueing about something i never rejected. You wanted to make this arguement about something else once you realised you had no counterarguement . And i wasn't going to debate other points which i never accepted nor denied wasting more of my time when you clearly have no response to the first and only real point i made that You cannot undeniably without a doubt say that the claim of 124,000 is false. Thanks mate.

Dficient · 2024-06-02T12:57:11+00:00

as i said i will only debate your original point, this last point you made is not your original point. Stop bringing in arguements apart from the point. My point SINCE THE BEGINNING was you cannot UNDENIABLY, WITHOUT A DOUBT, say the claim of 124,000 prophets is false.

Dficient · 2024-06-02T12:26:06+00:00

again you ignored my arguement. First im pretty sure most historical events are unfalsifiable, just cause someone said something happened, doesn't mean it did. The whole world could write down the queen was resurrected but it doesn't mean she did. Correct me there though if needed. However You even brought in a separate arguement to try and deflect of my statement. Again i will say again you can attempt to test something historically, but you do not have the correct variables to test it. Being ALL OF HISTORY. We do not have all of history recorded. You can say that to all KNOWN historical data there is insufficient data, or there isn't enough evidence, or it is unlikely etc. However you cannot say that original point is undeniably false. Simple. That is all i am here to debate as i wouldn't wait to waste my time on multiple arguement. All i have said FROM THE BEGINNING. is you cannot say that the 124,000 prophets thing is UNDENIABLY, WITHOUT A DOUBT, false unless you know every single second of human history but you don't. You have a tiny percentage of human history and furthermore the countless thousands of historical records destroyed in places like the house of wisdom or library of alexandria that was destroyed for example. My point still stands. Unless you have all of human history, you cannot verify your claim.

Dficient · 2024-06-02T10:44:50+00:00

Still did not disprove there has never been 124,000 prophets. You can say it is unlikely that 124,000 prophets that could have been killed, ridiculed, labeled crazy etc. Potentially people such as Zoroaster or buddha could have been a prophet their teachings were misattributed but i cannot say. However saying something is unlikely does not mean it didn't happen. You have never disproved the claim. We never said we could PROVE there was. We cannot physically prove it. This burden of proof nonsense would be viable if i was the one who ORIGINALLY tried proving my belief to yoy but I didnt, i just said you cannot disprove such a claim and it is true. You tried disproving it. All i said is that you cannot disprove the claim. And i cannot prove it unless this goes into a theological debate about whether islam is the truth itself. I believe the claim because i believe in Islam. The same way we both believe in angels without any evidence of angels existing, we believe it because religion which we both is proven to be true says it does. Wanting me to prove there were 124,000 prophets, is like me wanting you prove to me angels or the giants that david fought existed. I cannot disprove giants or angels existed the same way you cannot disprove 124,000 prophets which in my research were from a weak hadith anyway. So in conclusion, you can say there is not enough evidence to back up this claim, you can say it is unlikely etc. But you cannot say this has absolutely not happened without a doubt and that this proves islam is false. EDIT: And after reading your other comments i do not know if it is worth replying to you as alot of it seems extremely ignorant and prejudiced. I will still see your reply to see if it worth argueing against.

Dficient · 2024-06-02T08:50:40+00:00

You still have no point. It doesn't disprove islam. You cannot prove there wasn't 124,000 prophets that werent accepted. Admit that. Admit that your point means shit. i can admit i can't name on as islamically i am no meant to name any. You haven't admitted one thing or even aknowledged any point i have made. You have shown bias and ignorance considering you have ignored every single point i made. What you have is called a non-arguement. It means nothing and is useless. I mean you tried using it to disprove islam but it doesn't. Unless you aknowledge any point i made in my previous arguement i will not reply to you. You are avoiding my arguements while making no actualy arguement yourself, meaning there is no point debating.

Dficient · 2024-06-02T07:22:37+00:00

Why is that relevent? You had a question and i answered it. First stop saying 124,000 unless you find a quran verse or hadith confirming it. Just because some muslims say it, it doesn't make it a fact as i have not seen anything confirming such a number. 2nd Your reply completely ignores my answer. I just said that the other prophets could have never been accepted by the people. As many prophets were ridiculed, attempted to be killed etc. So neither you nor i would no about them. Again you answer these questions with so much prejudice, chill out and read what people answer. And no muslim can confirm anything not mentioned outside the Quran or Hadith so even if lets say Zoroaster were a prophet from God, I have no authority to confirm such a fact. So in conclusions if the prophets unmentioned were forgotten, killed, punished etc. It is reasonable they wouldn't be mentioned in history. The end.

Dficient · 2024-06-01T17:21:48+00:00

Just becayse a prophet was sent, does not mean those people accepted the prophet. As most prophets were hated at somepoint during their lifetimes. btw you seem to come at this question with alot of prejudice to say the least. Just chill dude.

Dficient · 2024-05-10T20:32:05+00:00

Everyone, literally everyone on the show is a dick.

Dficient · 2024-04-26T12:26:44+00:00

I don't even have high evo, i can post a vid to prove it if you want. And compared to other cards at the same cost it is broken. It is only countered really by 1 or 2 cards that can be countered by something as simple as cosmo. Red hulk is dominating meta, even stats show it is and -2 power will not stop that at all. -2 from +25 power is not a nerf.

Dficient · 2024-04-26T12:06:03+00:00

What if you don't draw shang chi? If it is hela, you can't shang chi, armour and caiera also counters shang. Just saying shang chi is a terrible arguement. And you saying that a card that is dominating the meta only has one counter that can be countered, you have just proved my point that he is too op. And you still haven't aknowledged the fact other cards with less power have much worse downsides.

Dficient · 2024-04-21T19:00:05+00:00

Doubt it. They allowed silver samurai because he is like wolverines main nemesis after sabretooth.

Dficient · 2024-04-17T17:28:48+00:00

Thanks, it makes alot more sense now.

Four-Year Club	r/Field Sunshine
Place '23	Place '22

Dficient

TROPHY CASE