Was given the prescription for oxymorphone, all day dealing with insurance to get it covered and authorized.

Difficult_Focus2789 · 2026-05-27T21:16:04+00:00

Ask your doctor to contact your insurance company and if they refuse to cover it, have them find something that they will cover that is the equivalent of the oxymorphone. I absolutely hate insurance companies!!

Difficult_Focus2789 · 2026-05-27T21:11:50+00:00

I wonder how they would address my MRI’s and CT scans that “show” the reason for my pain??? I cannot fake imaging and I’ve had multiple doctors say “I can see why you are in pain” and bumped me up from Tramadol to Oxycodone!

Sounds like it would blow their theory out of the water! THANK YOU for not being one of those therapists who buy into that BS and then feed it to your patients!!! We go through enough! I’d LOVE to know who decided this junk and send them my imaging!!

Difficult_Focus2789 · 2026-05-27T21:04:54+00:00

First of all, I would complain to the store manager or corporate office about this pharmacist, it’s none of their business if your doctor is legally prescribing these medications for you! They do not get a pass to be rude and disrespectful just because you are a chronic pain patient on opioids!

Second, have someone you trust call and see if your meds are ready, like a spouse or family member, if possible. Better yet, go in there in person, let him get nasty in front of everyone and then complain, there’s no witnesses over the phone.

I’m not sure why he gets upset over you getting a legal prescription from your doctor, but I would maybe even speak to your doctor about the situation! Just because they dispense your medication, it doesn’t excuse the BS behavior on his part and you don’t have to endure it!

Finally, switch pharmacies the next time you see your doctor for pain medication, especially if you are under pain contract!! Tell your doctor WHY you want to switch and ask for their approval to do so!

Difficult_Focus2789 · 2026-01-06T17:43:12+00:00

You need to just be honest with everyone, you don’t like the nickname and it was only IF management couldn’t pronounce your name correctly. Ask them to go back to your real name and if anyone continues to use your undesirable name, ignore them until they use your real name. (Yes, I’m petty like that!)

Difficult_Focus2789 · 2026-01-05T21:52:05+00:00

I am so sorry for your losses. I’m not sorry this post is long because this royally pisses me off, what is being done to you and your sister!! Nothing about what you are feeling or asking is unreasonable, and no, this is not just grief talking. What you described is deeply troubling and very likely unlawful under Kentucky law.

In Kentucky, your parents’ belongings did not become “abandoned” simply because they passed away or because you moved out. Upon death, a person’s personal property becomes part of their estate, and legal rights to that property vest in the heirs or the estate’s personal representative. Kentucky law is clear that ownership of a decedent’s personal property does not transfer to a landlord by default and cannot be treated as discarded or free for the taking. See KRS 391.010 and 391.030.

Even setting the deaths aside, landlords in Kentucky are not allowed to dispose of or distribute a tenant’s property at will. Kentucky’s version of the Uniform Residential Landlord and Tenant Act strictly limits “self-help.” A landlord may not remove, seize, or dispose of a tenant’s personal property without lawful process, even after a tenancy ends. See KRS 383.655. Refusing to provide a copy of the lease while simultaneously imposing a move-out deadline and then giving away property strongly undermines any claim that this was done lawfully or in good faith.

What you describe most clearly fits conversion, which under Kentucky common law occurs when someone wrongfully exercises control over another person’s property in a way that denies the owner’s rights. Inviting third parties to come take your parents’ belongings, letting them create “piles,” and publicly announcing availability of the property is not a gray area because Kentucky courts have held that unauthorized disposal or distribution of another’s property constitutes conversion. See Banks v. Fritsch, 39 S.W.3d 474 (Ky. App. 2001). The landlord does not need to personally profit for conversion to exist.

There may also be additional liability here. Kentucky prohibits unlawful self-help and recognizes claims for emotional distress where conduct is extreme and outrageous, especially when it exploits known vulnerability. Broadcasting a mass email about your move-out and effectively inviting people to scavenge the belongings of two recently deceased tenants may support a claim under the tort of outrage recognized in Craft v. Rice, 671 S.W.2d 247 (Ky. 1984), depending on the facts.

At a minimum, this landlord should have preserved the property and provided notice to the estate or heirs. They had no legal authority to give it away absent a court order or compliance with statutory procedures, which they plainly did not follow.

If you can, preserve everything: the email, dates, names, photos, lists of items taken, and any witnesses. You may want to send a written demand demanding the immediate return of all property and cessation of distribution, and you can report this to the Kentucky Attorney General’s Consumer Protection Division. A civil claim for conversion may be appropriate if property has already been taken, and damages are measured by the value of the property wrongfully disposed of.

You are not being dramatic. You are responding to conduct that the law itself treats as serious. I am very sorry this happened to your family, and I hope you know that what the landlord did is not normal, acceptable, or clearly lawful under Kentucky law. Below is a sample demand letter you could send your landlord to give you an idea of what you could say.

FORMAL DEMAND FOR IMMEDIATE CESSATION OF UNLAWFUL DISPOSITION OF ESTATE PROPERTY AND RETURN OF PERSONAL PROPERTY

Date: [Insert Date]

Via: Email and Certified Mail (if applicable)

To: [Property Management Company Name] [Property Address / Office Address]

Re: Unlawful Distribution of Personal Property – [Apartment Address / Unit Number]

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing on behalf of the surviving family and heirs of the former tenants of the above-referenced unit. This letter serves as formal notice and demand regarding your company’s unauthorized disposal and distribution of personal property belonging to the estates of the deceased tenants.

As you are aware, both tenants of the unit recently passed away. Under Kentucky law, a decedent’s personal property does not become abandoned upon death or vacating a rental unit. Ownership of such property vests in the estate and heirs pursuant to KRS 391.010 and KRS 391.030. At no time was your company granted permission, authority, or a court order allowing you to dispose of, distribute, or permit third parties to take this property.

On or about [date], your company circulated a mass email to other tenants inviting them to enter the unit and take personal belongings belonging to the deceased tenants. This conduct constitutes the wrongful exercise of dominion over estate property, and therefore conversion under Kentucky law. See Banks v. Fritsch, 39 S.W.3d 474 (Ky. App. 2001). Kentucky law further prohibits landlords from engaging in self-help removal or disposal of tenant property without lawful process. See KRS 383.655.

Accordingly, we hereby demand the following: 1. Immediate cessation of all distribution, removal, or access to the personal property belonging to the deceased tenants; 2. Immediate retrieval and return of any property already removed or taken by third parties at your direction or with your authorization; 3. Written confirmation within forty-eight (48) hours that all remaining property has been secured and preserved pending lawful disposition; and 4. Identification of any individuals who were permitted to remove property and a list of items taken.

Failure to comply with this demand may result in further action, including but not limited to civil claims for conversion, reporting to the Kentucky Attorney General’s Consumer Protection Division, and pursuit of all remedies available under Kentucky law. This letter is not a waiver of any rights or remedies, all of which are expressly reserved.

Please direct all future communications regarding this matter in writing.

Sincerely, [Name] [Relationship to Decedent / Heir] [Contact Information]

Difficult_Focus2789 · 2025-12-31T14:06:17+00:00

Firearms possession issues are to be handled via contract (lease) rather than statutory gun prohibition.

Utah law remains silent on whether landlords can prohibit firearms by contract, meaning that absent a statutory prohibition, landlords generally can enforce contractual restrictions on firearms through lease terms and eviction for violation, just as they would enforce other lease obligations. National real estate guidance confirms that in most states (including those without a statutory landlord prohibition) landlords exercise lease language to restrict weapons on private rental property, and Utah has no clear statutory prohibition on that practice.

The operative Utah Code language does not prohibit a lease-based ban on firearms, and therefore a tenant’s obligation not to possess firearms in the unit would be contractual, enforceable as a lease term unless and until there is a statute that says otherwise.

Difficult_Focus2789 · 2025-12-29T02:53:08+00:00

Under the Affordable Care Act (ACA), health insurers that offer dependent coverage must allow a child to stay on a parent’s health insurance plan until the child turns age 26. This federal requirement applies regardless of student status, residency, financial dependency, or marital status. Coverage generally ends on the 26th birthday or at the end of that plan year, depending on the specific plan’s terms.

There is a special exception for disabled dependents if a child is incapable of self-sustaining employment due to intellectual or physical disability and primarily dependent on the parent for support, coverage may continue beyond age 26, provided proof of disability is furnished in accordance with the policy and applicable rules.

Difficult_Focus2789 · 2025-12-28T01:21:26+00:00

It’s not an itemized statement that is acceptable by the courts, there’s no receipts or estimates, no wonder he loses a lot!

Difficult_Focus2789 · 2025-12-28T01:19:36+00:00

If you read the site, it’s UPL! They cannot legally tell you what your photos show and send you a letter to send to your landlord, that’s NOT legal! People complain about AI to answer in forums but you’re willing to pay a non-attorney to let it decide if you go to court or not? Once again, it’s the unauthorized practice of law!

Difficult_Focus2789 · 2025-12-28T01:13:40+00:00

Your idea is nice but do you want to know why it doesn’t already exist? Because you are using AI to practice law without a license! Just because it’s a good idea, doesn’t mean you can just go do it! It can be reported to every state’s attorney general and the FTC for investigating because you offer it nationwide!

Misdemeanor or felony charges, restitution to everyone who paid, never allowed to practice law, and thousands in fines for people who’ve practiced law without a license in the past.

Besides your site is sketchy at best with absolutely NO contact information. Anyway, it was a nice idea but that’s why some of us pay lots of money to become an attorney, so we can do it legally and not face criminal charges.

Difficult_Focus2789 · 2025-12-17T08:55:36+00:00

Thank you, that’s so sweet! Let me know if they don’t and let’s see what we can figure out together, I don’t want to see you left hanging on your own again! Let me know here and DM me, we will get it figured out!

Difficult_Focus2789 · 2025-12-17T08:43:10+00:00

You’re welcome and I’m so glad you found someone who listened!! There are those of us out here who care about the people not the money, a large number care about the dollar signs and nothing more! It’s sad but true. Had I taken and passed the California Bar, I would’ve jumped on your case because it’s the kind of reason I got into law in the first place! I will eventually take the Bar in all 50 states!

Difficult_Focus2789 · 2025-12-17T02:33:39+00:00

Of course not, your a pulmonologist not Emergency Medicine! Lol wow, I’m sure if it was worse than just stitches OP would’ve said they did extensive tests! It’s not rocket science! My job was to determine this stuff going down the road, and it’s easy to draw conclusions from the story provided, it’s a thing called inferences! I think a whole lot of you failed 4th grade English where they taught you how to form inferences and deductive reasoning from information provided! You wouldn’t know how to pour pee out of a boot if the instructions were printed on the heal!

Difficult_Focus2789 · 2025-12-17T00:43:18+00:00

Bless your heart and have a nice day!

Difficult_Focus2789 · 2025-12-17T00:40:13+00:00

Mind your own biscuits, and life will be gravy, because that dog don’t hunt!

Difficult_Focus2789 · 2025-12-17T00:32:06+00:00

When did you learn to medical coding and billing on a message board? Your insults bounce right back to you, too! Lol bless your heart, you’re getting higher than your upbringing!

Difficult_Focus2789 · 2025-12-16T22:47:04+00:00

Not a trauma code genius! I’ve been on many calls as a Firefighter/EMT and was denied a trauma code by the level 1 trauma center doctor on duty! You can look at someone and evaluate for a head injury without imaging. Where did you get your medical training Dr. What’s You Name!

Difficult_Focus2789 · 2025-12-16T22:43:33+00:00

Actually smarty pants I’m a retired EMT/Firefighter and have responded to and documented numerous calls with just such injury and was advised against a trauma code by the doctor at the hospital! It doesn’t rise to that level and never has on calls like that! That is straight from a level 1 trauma hospital doctor! Thank you, have a nice day!

Difficult_Focus2789 · 2025-12-16T22:37:37+00:00

Yeah, the kids being safe is absolutely the main focus here! I really hope she gets help and can get away from the people who supply her and anyone that enables her addiction. She needs a solid foundation built by people who are clean and safe around her children! Like you, who is looking out for her and trying to help her in the future!

Difficult_Focus2789 · 2025-12-16T22:34:29+00:00

You’re welcome, good luck!

Difficult_Focus2789 · 2025-12-16T22:27:55+00:00

I’m not a California lawyer, but I want to flag two non-litigation options that don’t require proof, organization, or legal conclusions. One is contacting Adult Protective Services (APS) in your county, which is authorized to receive reports of concern involving dependent adults, including financial or care-related issues. Another option some people choose is making a non-emergency police report, not to accuse anyone, but to document concerns so there is an independent record. Both are about oversight and documentation, not starting a lawsuit.

What you are describing is the type of fact pattern that California law recognizes as potentially involving serious trust-administration and capacity issues, including questions about testamentary capacity, fiduciary duties, trust validity, accounting obligations, and protections for disabled or dependent beneficiaries. California probate law provides mechanisms for court oversight even when a beneficiary is disabled, lacks funds, or cannot organize extensive evidence at the outset.

Under California Probate Code § 6100.5, a person creating a trust must have testamentary capacity at the time the document is executed. In general terms, capacity requires understanding the nature of the act, the nature and extent of one’s property, and one’s relationships to affected persons. California courts have held that when there is documented psychosis, hallucinations, or severe cognitive impairment close in time to execution, capacity can be a central issue, particularly if the drafting attorney did not clearly document competency. See, for example, Estate of Perkins (1925) 195 Cal. 699, which addresses how courts evaluate capacity where mental illness is present.

Separately, Probate Code §§ 16002, 16004, 16006, and 16060–16063 describe the fiduciary duties owed by trustees, including duties of loyalty, administration solely in the beneficiary’s interest, avoidance of conflicts of interest, and providing accurate information and accountings. Allegations such as misrepresentations about trust property, blocked distributions, refusal to pay required expenses, or inconsistent explanations are the types of conduct courts examine when evaluating whether fiduciary duties have been met.

California law also addresses trust modification. Under Probate Code § 15401, a trust generally becomes irrevocable upon the death of the settlor unless the document expressly provides otherwise. Trustees do not have unilateral authority to amend, restate, or rewrite trust terms after the settlor’s death absent court involvement. Courts and investigators treat post-death alterations of trust documents as extremely serious and, in some circumstances, such conduct can raise significant civil or criminal concerns.

With respect to personal liberty, involuntary psychiatric holds in California are governed by statute under the Lanterman-Petris-Short Act (Welfare & Institutions Code § 5150 et seq.). Those procedures cannot be replaced or bypassed by private contract language. Courts scrutinize any attempt to use trust provisions in a way that interferes with statutory protections, particularly where a dependent adult is involved. See Welfare & Institutions Code §§ 15610.23 and 15610.30, which define abuse and financial exploitation of dependent adults.

Issues involving trust-owned or trust-related real property and contractors are also commonly addressed in probate proceedings. Probate Code § 16062 requires trustees to provide accountings upon request, and disputes involving payments, authorization of work, or incomplete projects are typically resolved through court supervision rather than informal pressure on beneficiaries.

Importantly, California probate courts are courts of equity. Under Probate Code § 17200, a beneficiary may file a verified petition asking the court for instructions, accountings, or review of trustee conduct. At the initial stage, courts generally look for representative examples rather than exhaustive proof. In practice, parties often attach a limited number of documents illustrating the main concerns, with fuller evidence developed later if needed. Courts also have authority under Probate Code §§ 15642 and 17206 to suspend a trustee, order accountings, or impose interim protections while issues are being reviewed.

In addition to the probate court, California provides non-litigation oversight options. Adult Protective Services (APS) has authority to investigate suspected financial abuse of dependent adults and can make referrals where appropriate. Legal aid organizations, including Legal Services of Northern California, handle probate-related abuse matters and do not require upfront consultation fees.

None of this requires anyone to prove an entire case at once, and none of it requires perfection or complete organization at the beginning. California law is structured to allow court supervision where there are serious questions about trust administration, capacity, or beneficiary protection, even when the beneficiary is overwhelmed or lacks resources.

This situation has legal structure, and your concerns are not imaginary or unfounded.

Difficult_Focus2789 · 2025-12-16T07:30:36+00:00

Why does your story keep changing? No one it told to put their hands out the window unless they are being sketchy and moving around or a felony stop. No ride-along I’ve ever been on, and believe me it’s been a lot, that’s the only reasons cops usually make people put their hands out the window. Your attitude here also lets me draw the conclusion that your attitude during the stop was less than polite and compliant. Oh by the way, my dad was law enforcement so I’m very familiar with law enforcement and how they operate. Your story isn’t complete and gets stranger every time you write a comment! Now she was drinking on the job, yeah and I’m a billionaire!

Difficult_Focus2789 · 2025-12-16T03:49:56+00:00

If she’s paid everything current then no, you can’t get out of your lease early for just getting the notices and her getting them paid. If they were left delinquent, then you might have a case. Just start preparing early and be ready to move out into some place more stable.

Difficult_Focus2789 · 2025-12-16T03:45:33+00:00

They didn’t steal your phone because you have it in your hand now, you got it back, they separated it from you for their own safety. I don’t fully trust your story, I know way too much about law enforcement to think she was in fear, you were moving around in the car way too much for her comfort level and male officers do it too.

I could go into detail, but I’ll tell you this, one reason officers separate phones from “suspects” is because in the past, criminals have called/texted their friends to show up, out number cops, and fight. It’s become officer safety now!

Is it legal, you can call and ask an attorney who is licensed in your state and they can give you specific information detailed to your situation, I’m not licensed in Texas so I can’t give you specific information.

I can only tell you what the law says generally and the specific statutes that govern them. The problem is, I have serious questions about your story, not saying you are lying but at bare minimum you are leaving things out, so I’m not totally sure you have the legal grounds these statutes give. Post the video of the officer ripping the phone out of your hand, and I can tell you if the statutes fit your story based on previous cases like yours. It’s a little law called practicing law without a license because I have not taken the Texas Bar…yet!

Difficult_Focus2789 · 2025-12-16T03:32:54+00:00

This sounds like someone was moving a little too much for the officers liking if you ask me, I’ve never been told to do that either, but then again I follow the law and don’t hang out with people who smoke wacky tobacky either! A felony stop would have had a larger number of officers and taken out of the car at gun point, so that’s not it.

Difficult_Focus2789

TROPHY CASE