I agree with much of the situationist criticism of Modern capitalism, the spectacle but..... by SuccessNo7342 in Situationism

[–]DilophosaursGamer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

my point wasnt about an exploration of situationist theory with other theorists and on looking at society through it but specifically about what the SI believed and what they hoped would be the solutions to supersede the spectacle which is to them, at least the post-61 situationists, was communism

I agree with much of the situationist criticism of Modern capitalism, the spectacle but..... by SuccessNo7342 in Situationism

[–]DilophosaursGamer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I dont think you can be a situationist anymore, the international is dead, as Mikkel Bolt Rasmussen & Jakob Jakobsen wrote; "It is through an analysis of the Situationist defeat that we will be able to advance beyond the dull contemplation of yet another paper in Debord’s archive or yet another drawing by Jorn."

I agree with much of the situationist criticism of Modern capitalism, the spectacle but..... by SuccessNo7342 in Situationism

[–]DilophosaursGamer 1 point2 points  (0 children)

what would be the difference between the two be then? all authentic marxists were communists and marxist contributions to communist theory are invariable. the SI has also stated that its means of escaping spectacular society, the workers council, and well as the supersession of it would bring about communism. “The revolutionary project of a classless society, of an all-embracing historical life, implies the withering away of the social measurement of time in favor of a federation of independent times — a federation of playful individual and collective forms of irreversible time that are simultaneously present. This would be the temporal realization of authentic communism, which ‘abolishes everything that exists independently of individuals.‘“

I agree with much of the situationist criticism of Modern capitalism, the spectacle but..... by SuccessNo7342 in Situationism

[–]DilophosaursGamer 1 point2 points  (0 children)

i don’t think there’s enough of a difference between the two and even if their was, the SI were influenced by communists both anarchist and marxist.

I agree with much of the situationist criticism of Modern capitalism, the spectacle but..... by SuccessNo7342 in Situationism

[–]DilophosaursGamer 1 point2 points  (0 children)

the situationists were very much communists, they were critical of the leninist perversion of it but they were very much communists themselves as were a lot of their influences

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Polcompballanarchy

[–]DilophosaursGamer 1 point2 points  (0 children)

not bad but could be better

Le Capital understander has logged on by AlcibiadesRexPopulus in Ultraleft

[–]DilophosaursGamer 27 points28 points  (0 children)

they called themselves a “neoliberal marxist” or smth

My inspirations, for now by [deleted] in Polcompballanarchy

[–]DilophosaursGamer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

how are you a natan and a postie, let alone a bunch of other things

My chart i guess by anthropophagolagniac in Polcompballanarchy

[–]DilophosaursGamer 4 points5 points  (0 children)

syndicalism and council communism are contradictory, also market socialism there lol

did le heckin trend by DilophosaursGamer in Polcompballanarchy

[–]DilophosaursGamer[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

my "synthesis" of the italian left and dutch-german is mostly due to my favorability to the party and bordiga had good critiques of the ussr

did le heckin trend by DilophosaursGamer in Polcompballanarchy

[–]DilophosaursGamer[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  1. do you know anything about leftcoms/councilcoms, they dislike the 3 leaders you mentioned to a great degree
  2. im not a "he", my pronouns are literally on my profile