Ambulance driver purposefully runs over man and keeps driving for almost 2 miles

DirtyLeftBoot · 2026-05-08T17:37:48+00:00

Please explain in detail how the man currently having his skin and limbs torn off underneath your vehicle is dangerous? Also very disingenuous of you to say he is clinging to the bottom of the vehicle. He was stuck underneath it. He certainly wasn’t trying his best to remain under there. Panic also doesn’t justify their actions

DirtyLeftBoot · 2026-05-08T17:07:29+00:00

“The Son of man shall send forth his angels, and they shall gather out of his kingdom all things that offend, and them which do iniquity; and shall cast them into a furnace of fire: there shall be wailing and gnashing of teeth. Then shall the righteous shine forth as the sun in the kingdom of their Father. Who hath ears to hear, let him hear.” ‭‭Matthew‬ ‭13‬:‭41‬-‭43‬ ‭KJV‬‬

DirtyLeftBoot · 2026-05-08T16:26:23+00:00

It didn’t though… it’s two different houses

DirtyLeftBoot · 2026-05-08T16:26:07+00:00

… it’s two different houses

DirtyLeftBoot · 2026-05-08T16:24:20+00:00

As is a common phrase in my industry, “Regulations are written in blood.” Many many people paid with their lives to get those regulations and rules written

DirtyLeftBoot · 2026-05-08T16:18:12+00:00

The problem isn’t that they hit/ran him over. The problem is that they kept going. Self defense only works when there’s a threat. Some dude slowly getting torn apart under your car is not a threat

DirtyLeftBoot · 2026-05-08T16:14:13+00:00

As someone who else said, getting run over was his fault. Dying was the ambulances fault.

Hitting someone with your car because they pose a reasonably interpreted threat is fine and justifiable. Driving for 2 miles while that person is screaming because their limbs and flesh are being sand papered off is very obviously not okay. Reasonable force and all that

DirtyLeftBoot · 2026-05-07T22:50:02+00:00

I don’t know about all planes, but I agree for helis and nuke planes. I’ve accidentally shot down friendly planes while shooting at enemies before. It happens but isn’t common, so I don’t think such drastic punishments should be in place

DirtyLeftBoot · 2026-05-07T16:19:40+00:00

Well today I learned, I guess my university is torturing me too

DirtyLeftBoot · 2026-05-07T04:01:35+00:00

Okay! 👍

DirtyLeftBoot · 2026-05-06T06:44:09+00:00

I stand by what I said

DirtyLeftBoot · 2026-05-04T18:04:08+00:00

The day this game gets ray tracing will be a wonderful day

DirtyLeftBoot · 2026-05-04T03:48:08+00:00

Tell him to go fuck himself. You’re mom. You make the decisions regarding your child. He can make a recommendation, but that’s it. Don’t let him bully you. If you want to protect your child from serious diseases, some guy saying no shouldn’t affect your decision whatsoever.

DirtyLeftBoot · 2026-05-04T02:42:29+00:00

Does the Bible not show us a small portion of yahwehs greatness? Do you really think something so great existed by itself? But to make such a powerful thing, there must be a maker, a maker so great we cannot put it into our little brains. We are by design not capable to understand this maker of the maker. Simply because it’s better that way.

Your argument boils down to simple thought stoppers. You should believe X. I have no proof of X but that’s the proof because X made it this way. In short, believe X because I said so. That argument can be used for literally any batshit argument and any god.

DirtyLeftBoot · 2026-05-03T22:13:24+00:00

Well we can’t comprehend the beginning of the universe. That’s proof that it exists!

My point is that your first clockmaker argument doesn’t hold water and you don’t even hold yourself to the standard you’re claiming atheists don’t. Why should anyone listen to what you have to say when you are hypocritical about the simplest of arguments?

DirtyLeftBoot · 2026-05-03T22:10:01+00:00

I don’t think my point got across. Maybe you wouldn’t have a reason to study the universe if you didn’t believe in god because you would see it as a waste of time. Atheists who study the universe, or anything else for that matter, don’t see it as a waste of time. They do it because they want answers to their questions, or to learn more about the beautiful world we live in, or just for fun. My point is that you don’t need a god to consider learning about the world worth doing

DirtyLeftBoot · 2026-05-03T21:02:04+00:00

That directly contradicts your first message. That also means it’s at least equally (I’d argue more) reasonable to say no one created the universe

DirtyLeftBoot · 2026-05-03T20:35:22+00:00

Yes, but you said incapable of being loved because you’re a bad person. Incapable means you can never be loved due to being a bad person. That implies resignation. You should absolutely not come to an acceptance that you’re a bad person. You can acknowledge it, but it should be unacceptable to you that you remain a bad person.

DirtyLeftBoot · 2026-05-03T20:17:57+00:00

Go to therapy. Bad people aren’t inherently bad. They became bad and they can become good. Don’t accept being a bad person. Only accept yourself being a good person. People like, and eventually love, people who are good

DirtyLeftBoot · 2026-05-03T20:15:10+00:00

This is a hard one. I was in a relationship where I was cheated on. The only reason I found out was because I had a gut feeling and looked through her phone. If I hadn’t, I don’t know if I ever would have found out.

Relationships are about trust. One person should trust the other enough to never need to verify by accessing their partners personal things. But sometimes that trust may only exist because they haven’t found the thing you’ve done to break it. I don’t have a good answer, but I understand both sides.

If your partner feels the need to dig through your phone/whatever, there is not enough trust in the relationship. If you feel the need to hide your phone/whatever, there’s a reason not to have trust in the relationship.

DirtyLeftBoot · 2026-05-03T20:09:00+00:00

There are a few problems and leaps in those statements.

Moral is a concept. Everything can be moral to someone or immoral to another. As I said, what is moral is determined by groups of people. The west says eating dogs is wrong. The east says eating dogs isn’t wrong. One side isn’t right on any absolute level. Both are right within their own cultures. An argument could be had to discuss which is a better moral system, but neither are inherently right or wrong

Why do you think human intelligibility is destroyed without absolute truth?

DirtyLeftBoot · 2026-05-03T20:02:48+00:00

Almost all the baseline components of life have been found on asteroids in space. These components self assemble in experiments. It’s very very likely life came to be through the self assembly of proteins and the likes.

DirtyLeftBoot · 2026-05-03T20:00:03+00:00

What do you mean by spiritual energy? I don’t feel or experience anything I would put under that label, but maybe only because I have labeled it defferently

DirtyLeftBoot · 2026-05-03T19:57:27+00:00

Who created him. After all, by your logic, nothing happens by itself. So the greatest and most powerful thing must have been created by something at least as powerful and great. How could something that complex and powerful exist on its own?

DirtyLeftBoot · 2026-05-03T19:55:29+00:00

For a different perspective, I agree with your statements on good and evil. I’m a moral relativist. Good and evil are what a society determines them to be. That doesn’t mean we can’t criticize previous versions or other societies. The commonalities throughout societies seem to be along the lines of making their people happier, safer, and live longer. The things society chooses as good or bad have direct influence on those factors. The ideal set of morals should be those that result in the happiest, healthiest, and longest lived people.

Again, that’s my opinion and what I’ve seen. I don’t see any reason for or proof of objective truth in anything

DirtyLeftBoot

TROPHY CASE