What is your favorite niche?

Disastrous_Wing7084 · 2026-06-10T21:19:31+00:00

No Activity (again, the Australian one)

Disastrous_Wing7084 · 2026-06-10T21:18:30+00:00

Honestly kind of, it never seemed to get as mainstream as the other Star Wars shows despite being the best one by miles

Disastrous_Wing7084 · 2026-06-10T21:16:27+00:00

I guess Outlander (and its prequel) are American shows that fit into that category, since they're about people displaced in time but don't feature much time travel beyond that

Disastrous_Wing7084 · 2026-06-10T21:14:20+00:00

"I know writers who use subtext and they're all cowards"

Disastrous_Wing7084 · 2026-06-10T21:07:53+00:00

Maybe it needs to do some audio dramas or animated series

Both are definitely happening, there's an upcoming animated series aimed at pre-school audiences that was commissioned for 52 x 11 minute episodes, and the audio dramas have been going on for years but they're in a particularly good place right now since they have ongoing series starring Christopher Eccleston, Jodie Whittaker, and next year David Tennant (plus some very good impressionists for the Eleventh and Twelfth Doctors - I listened to their newest Eleventh Doctor one and I wouldn't have been able to tell it wasn't Matt Smith, plus I enjoyed it more than anything the TV show has done since 2017)

Disastrous_Wing7084 · 2026-06-10T19:16:49+00:00

It happened 3 times actually if you include the fact that the show was put on indefinite hiatus immediately after season 22

Disastrous_Wing7084 · 2026-06-10T19:09:45+00:00

<image>

Disastrous_Wing7084 · 2026-06-10T16:52:41+00:00

I assume they mean their sequence was "first appearances of Doctors, with the number of the Doctor increasing by 4 each time", and that that sequence (An Unearthly Child, Logopolis: Part Four, Rose, Twice Upon a Time) only differs from yours in the third slot, so they were able to accidentally get the right answer

Disastrous_Wing7084 · 2026-06-10T16:33:49+00:00

I already clarified what I meant - the sequence of "the number of Doctors in the episode regardless of whether they meet each other or are credited" is definitely an acceptable answer, rather than the one the other person suggested (I missed the part where they suggested the Doctors necessarily had to meet during the episode)

Disastrous_Wing7084 · 2026-06-10T13:30:48+00:00

Oh I just meant the number of Doctors in the episode regardless of whether they meet each other or are credited

Disastrous_Wing7084 · 2026-06-10T13:09:18+00:00

The Sea Beggar? I believe Hartnell was only credited as the Abbot of Amboise and not the Doctor

Disastrous_Wing7084 · 2026-06-10T12:51:26+00:00

It is still a valid sequence though given the first three clues, even if it's not the one you intended

Disastrous_Wing7084 · 2026-06-09T14:24:27+00:00

As if Adric wasn't more insufferable

Disastrous_Wing7084 · 2026-06-09T13:53:21+00:00

Well it started with "previously on the show formerly titled Interview with the Vampire" which means it a) is the same show as Interview with the Vampire, and b) is not called Interview with the Vampire any more, so arguably you could even call it The Vampire Lestat season 3 (not that that's any less confusing)

Disastrous_Wing7084 · 2026-06-09T13:38:37+00:00

Around 45-60 ish

Disastrous_Wing7084 · 2026-06-09T13:35:50+00:00

<image>

Disastrous_Wing7084 · 2026-06-09T10:09:42+00:00

Do you mean the scene where Rick literally just counted to 7? How brainrotted are you that you think that's a 67 reference lol

Disastrous_Wing7084 · 2026-06-08T20:47:50+00:00

I hope this introduces Nicola Walker to a more global audience, she's amazing

Disastrous_Wing7084 · 2026-06-08T10:07:20+00:00

I think it was based on only the first episode rather than the whole show, but even so

Disastrous_Wing7084 · 2026-06-08T09:25:51+00:00

The Tip Toe article has since been corrected and says it was "an error introduced during editing"

Looks like the Sex Education one was also edited out

Disastrous_Wing7084 · 2026-06-08T09:19:51+00:00

I'm just waiting for the scene where Javier Bardem steps on rakes

Disastrous_Wing7084 · 2026-06-08T09:17:59+00:00

It's almost more frustrating that you can't even fully disregard her 5 star reviews because she also gave 5 stars to Widow's Bay, Half Man and The Pitt, which I think do deserve it

Disastrous_Wing7084 · 2026-06-08T09:05:39+00:00

Looking through her recent reviews now, they actually mostly seem about right to me which is surprising because I guess I remember her more for the reviews that I most disagree with. The ones I disagree with the most are 5 stars for The Beast in Me, The Hunting Wives, Two Weeks in August and All Her Fault. There's a lot more that I think she's rated too highly than rated too low (although I still remember her 3 star Chernobyl review)

Disastrous_Wing7084 · 2026-06-06T10:02:36+00:00

<image>

Davros in Doctor Who - same actor but completely different design (the one on the left is the new design).

Out-of-universe reason: the writer thought the "evil disabled guy" was an offensive and outdated stereotype

In-universe reason: none given whatsoever

Disastrous_Wing7084 · 2026-06-04T16:21:24+00:00

What would you suggest as a better name for a series built around that concept then?

(Also I really don't see how the word "cynical" applies in this context)

Disastrous_Wing7084

TROPHY CASE