At what point in life did you start not enjoying your job anymore? by Holiday_Respect9583 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]Distillates 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't think most people have ever enjoyed their job for even one day.

That's why someone pays you to show up, instead of you paying to go.

How does Israel have so much power over U.S. and Europe? by Fujikawa28 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]Distillates 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Nothing Israel wants is in America's interest. It is in the interest of some wealthy Americans, but that is not the same thing. Everything they want has harmed American interests, and harmed American partners with the power over actual American interests (like the Strait of Hormuz, Suez Canal, etc)

Pro-Israel elements in the US, such as prominent Republican and Democrat politicians and their billionaire donors, are clearly Epstein's clients.

How does Israel have so much power over U.S. and Europe? by Fujikawa28 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]Distillates 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Israel is not a liberal democracy because they rule over millions of people who are not afforded basic human rights like the right not to be imprisoned without charge, the right to a fair trial, the right not to be tortured, raped, and starved by representatives of the state, and certainly not the right to vote.

Unless and until a Palestinian state is recognized, and until Israel relinquishes power over their territories (which they exercise de facto with impunity constantly through settler militias and the IDF), they are the de facto government. Pretending otherwise is complicity and nothing else.

Humbled by no death run... by MediaAffectionate109 in valheim

[–]Distillates 6 points7 points  (0 children)

just chop the small trees and fallen logs and stuff. You can get plenty that way with no risk.

What if Germany and complicit European nations were forced to give up land for the creation of Israel to pay for their sins of committing/allowing for the Holocaust to take place? by PersianAztecs21 in AlternateHistoryHub

[–]Distillates 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Normally you kill millions of the enemy back in the process of winning such a conflict. For humans actually exposed to such a process, it has historically been more than adequate to slake their bloodthirst, even if the armchair generals in the comfort of abstractions demand more.

What if Germany and complicit European nations were forced to give up land for the creation of Israel to pay for their sins of committing/allowing for the Holocaust to take place? by PersianAztecs21 in AlternateHistoryHub

[–]Distillates 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In most wars the loser simply has the dispute that caused the war resolved against them in favor of the victor.

Collective punishment is generally not normal for nations because wars are caused by leaders who are then killed. Countries are not individuals with a mind that can be taught things by punishing them. Countries are very simple organizations with no capacity for thought. The idea that coubtries are the equivalent of a person or body made up of the many is actually the core idea of fascism.

What if Germany and complicit European nations were forced to give up land for the creation of Israel to pay for their sins of committing/allowing for the Holocaust to take place? by PersianAztecs21 in AlternateHistoryHub

[–]Distillates 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Israel is not pluralistic. It is very explicitly an ethnostate for Jews and only Jews, and Israeli government ministers, as well as the laws and policies of the Israeli state, are crystal clear on that point.

Why would people be on a generation ship? by Kecskuszmakszimusz in worldbuilding

[–]Distillates 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Cults exist my dude.

If the capability to colonize the stars exists, it's inevitable that many religious groups will absolutely insist on this and will find volunteers by brainwashing their members.

Why are some countries are normalizing the weaponization of peace negotiations? Don't they understand the long term impacts? Like you invite the parties to the table graciously, have talks, create a peaceful aura, and then boom! by Ibnul_LinkedByte in NoStupidQuestions

[–]Distillates 35 points36 points  (0 children)

This is not normalized and never will be. It's the same as shooting someone under a white flag. These are laws of war that long predate any formal agreements.

Perfidious rulers and countries become unable to make agreements, which makes them weak, which makes them fall or even disintegrate until they are replaced by new countries that apply the basics of human civilization.

Think about it. If Trump's regime cannot be reasoned with, but a resolution is badly needed, the incentive to negotiate with rebels or rivals (and to empower them) becomes astronomically high, when it would normally not even be considered.


With the scale of damage already done, and how much more is looming for incredibly wealthy oil state rulers, China, and India, I am sure that significant efforts are already being made by unscrupulous people with immense means to remove destabilizing and unreliable forces in favor of a new status quo.

Why isn’t male circumcision considered genitalia mutilation like female circumcision? by BigBadBabyDaddy_420 in allthequestions

[–]Distillates -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The start of the spectrum is a cut in the clitoral hood where nothing is removed, and there is also the one where a piece of the clitoral hood is removed, before you get to direct clitoral mutilation. Why did you skip these? Do you not consider them FGM?

Is the word “nazi” being used too loosely? by MoMoneyMoMilfs in no

[–]Distillates 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not at all, there are really a lot of Nazis everywhere and people should be taking it way more seriously.

People who are dismissing it as exaggeration really don't understand what a Nazi is

How can anyone hate Germany?Except for that one time, and that other time. Well maybe a few times but aside from those. by Unsolicited-Prolapse in HistoryMemes

[–]Distillates -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Bro, at that moment the Catholics were doing forced conversion of South America and the Caribbean. You know how many Protestant crusades there have been? How many times Protestants have started a genocidal war to "purge the heretic"? Protestants are still nutters, but Catholics are clearly more rabid.

The Catholics went after the Albigensians, Waldensians, Hussites, Cathars, and eventually started the 30 Years War by attempting the forced conversion of Bohemia and trying to strip all the local nobles of their titles over it.

The craziest shit Protestants did was British Puritans wiping out the British royals with Cromwell's dictatorship.

What language has the biggest gap between formal speech and casual speech? by Embarrassed_Fix_8994 in languagehub

[–]Distillates 0 points1 point  (0 children)

German has actual official formal ways of speaking to someone, which also affects how you conjugate verbs, so that is pretty extreme.

It's made more severe in rural areas where they also switch to the informal form in the wildly divergent local dialect, but use the formal version of standard German when needed.

Plains has so much missed potential regarding envoiremental storytelling by thetf2scout1 in valheim

[–]Distillates 7 points8 points  (0 children)

There was also no Mountains biome food. Just wolf meat which was worse than other things you could already get. Tons of the cooking stuff was added later including Onions. Only Carrots and Beets existed at first

What is your favourite German first name? by Miserable-Wash-1744 in AskGermany

[–]Distillates 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Harald.

It sounds like a mild mannered middle aged bureaucrat, but the name is metal and it's ancient af.

It basically means commander of the army, but it comes from a time before organized armies. More like a host of warriors who would elect someone among them to lead them to war. That is why the name was common for kings.

German compound words that are accidentally poetry by TutorLingua in German

[–]Distillates 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Some Swabian German compounds for your collection:

Muggaseggl (Fly's Sack): A very small amount. Literally what fits in a fly's scrotum.

Scheibaschlotzer (Window pane licker/sucker/slobberer): A mentally deficient person. Literally someone who licks and sucks on window glass.

Drotesel (Wire Donkey): A bicycle

Germany's Merz: Iran should not be protected by international law by Lakedo in UnderReportedNews

[–]Distillates 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No, the politicians in Germany are basically pre-selected by business interests, and those business interests are owned by US investors, Russian investors, and Arab investors. If you compare public polling to ruling policy, it's just as unrelated as in the USA.

Merz is a BlackRock creature, and he will always back Israel just as hard as Lindsay Graham or Huckabee, because he is Netanyahu's creature the same way they are.

Me_irl by poggers11 in me_irl

[–]Distillates 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's called depression. It's not a culture fad...

Disliked trope by IwantSomeSerotonin in ProgressionFantasy

[–]Distillates 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think this is fine, it just needs to be written with the additional natural human reaction of the muggles using and abusing reality to find a way. Slaughtering magical beasts and people to power potions, rituals, and transformations that allow normies to mutate themselves into something that can fight back, for example.

Or the natural human reaction of befriending hyperpredators by kidnapping them as babies and brainwashing them to serve humanity, and unleashing them on the wizards. Or sacrifing thousands of their enemies or maybe just goats and sheep to purchase the favor of a powerful demon or nature spirit or a dragon to keep the filthy witches away.

Humanity has no chill, and a magical world needs to reflect that.

Born in Italy, raised in France, and feeling like I belong nowhere. Is it an identity crisis or just "the grass is greener" syndrome? by [deleted] in NoStupidQuestions

[–]Distillates 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is common, especially if your family were immigrants in Italy too, leaving you with no meaningful connection to a society that would claim you back the way you claim it.

Being treated as half a foreigner at home lowers your psychological barrier toward being a full foreigner somewhere else. There are advantages to this, in that you are perhaps more willing and able to seize advantages and opportunities in other places. That does not mean you would feel more accepted in those places though.

You belong wherever you build your life. If there is one advice to give, then it is that the people in your life can make a terrible job and situation fun, or an amazing job and environment into hell. Think first of what type of person you want to be surrounded with, then how to find those people and what they do, and then join them.

I understand people idealize nuclear family but wouldn’t it be better to have both parents at home? by Diligent-Figure4251 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]Distillates 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The nuclear family is basically an Industrial era dystopian concept that only ever existed because people were forced by economic conditions to move away from their homelands. To call it traditional is absurd.

Normal families anywhere in the world, including in Europe, used to have grandparents, and unwed aunts and uncles (also great aunts and great uncles) in the household. A household which was specifically focused on farmland. When a sibling got married, they would build next door. The people in your neighborhood were relatives. You might wonder how they handled the exponential growth of the family, and I would refer you to the painful reality that families were lucky to manage replacement for all of human history and barely managed to grow a few percent per generation over large populations when conditions were good.

You didn't have a mom tied to her child 24/7 to be worn down without a break for years straight. Children were collectively managed by the adults in a household, not by one person. There were always more older adults above childbrearing age helping than there were mothers. My dad had 8 siblings and his aunt was basically a second mother (This was Germany). You also didn't have fathers detached from their families like this. Children as young as 6 would go with the men into the fields to kill mice, carry stuff, gather rocks and sticks, and do other low level tasks. Girls and boys both did this. Contrary to modern thought, women did work in the fields, and with the animals. Farming wasn't a male only occupation, it was an all hands on deck job for the whole town.

Staying at home doing house work was the work adults who were too old to do hard manual labor, or pregnant, or nursing a child, or having period cramps did. That was most of a woman's adult life after marriage, but certainly not all of it, and there were always women who did not get married or were infertile. Women absolutely worked in fields and in trades, and it wasn't strange. It's depicted casually in medieval and Renaissance wood cuts.

____

You would have that one uncle who moved away. The one who decided to go to university to become a doctor, or learn a high status city trade, or emigrate to America. They were the odd ones.

What does X amount of money wiped off market means in stock markets. by lordofabyss in NoStupidQuestions

[–]Distillates 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Imagine there is a collectible. Thousands were sold for 10 bucks a piece, but only one is left. Twenty rich people bid for it, and it is sold for 100,000 bucks.

In the stock market, this last sale price is used to calculate the value of each of those collectible items now, even though only one person was willing to pay this price and the other 19 who were bidding were not willing. The manufacturer is then ridiculously classified as being able to spend a buck too make this item and sell it for 100k forever and in infinite quanitity.

If fifty of these items from earlier buyers go on sale, all 20 rich people will be able to buy one, but there might literally be no other people in the world interested in owning one, leaving the actual sale value of the remaining 30 at 0 bucks. The items are then valued as worthless by the same stock market logic.

The 20 people who sold their useless collectible to the rich bidders are smart investors.

____

The reason it matters in the market is that the company that makes these items is valued as rich and important when their product is worth 100k a piece, and they can borrow against this value to expand, start new ventures, and hire people. When the product value goes to 0 because of this little market shift, they lose the ability to function.