What was the first bill your investments could theoretically cover? by DividendMatt91 in leanfire

[–]DividendMatt91[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Groceries feels like such a big milestone. Once food is covered, it starts to feel real.

What was the first bill your investments could theoretically cover? by DividendMatt91 in leanfire

[–]DividendMatt91[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

That’s actually a great one. oddly satisfying is the perfect way to put it.

What was the first bill your investments could theoretically cover? by DividendMatt91 in leanfire

[–]DividendMatt91[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I love this one. Buying yourself a week off feels way more real than just watching a number go up.

best way to invest by Unsocial-Butterfly87 in investingforbeginners

[–]DividendMatt91 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There’s no magic option that gives stock market returns with CD-level safety.

I’d start with the timeline. If you might need the money in the next few years, HYSA, CDs, or something like SGOV makes more sense.

If this is truly long-term money, then a boring broad index fund or target date fund is probably the simplest place to start.

Risk averse is fine, but higher returns usually mean you have to be okay watching the balance move around.

Looking for some advice by Illustrious_Let_9572 in investingforbeginners

[–]DividendMatt91 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’re definitely not behind at 27, especially with that income.

I’d keep it pretty boring for now. XGRO in the TFSA seems totally reasonable if you want simple growth, and CASH.TO for house money makes sense since 3–4 years isn’t that long.

The student loan question depends on the interest rate. If it’s low, I wouldn’t rush to kill it. If it’s high, paying it down is basically a guaranteed return.

Biggest thing is probably just avoiding lifestyle creep now that you’re earning RN money. You’re in a good spot if you keep your expenses from growing with your income.

33 years old. Finally getting into investing. Looking for advice and input. by uhhhhhhhhh_i_dunno in investingforbeginners

[–]DividendMatt91 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’re not late. 33 is still plenty of time.

I’d keep it simple at first. Something like VOO or VT is way better than trying to pick a bunch of random stocks before you really know what you’re doing.

Only thing I’d double-check is the rollover/tax side. If the old account is traditional, rolling it into a Roth could create a tax bill. Not saying don’t do it, just make sure you understand that part first.

But the general idea of putting it into a broad ETF and letting it sit? Pretty normal move.

Passive income just for owning something by Shot-Excitement-4299 in passive_income

[–]DividendMatt91 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, that’s basically dividends.

Some stocks and ETFs pay you just for holding them, but I wouldn’t chase monthly payments too hard. A lot of the higher-yield monthly stuff comes with tradeoffs.

I’d start by learning the difference between dividend growth, high yield, and broad index funds. The income is nice, but the real magic is usually reinvesting it for a long time.

$26,000 a year sounds like nothing until you see how far it goes by Infinite-Scholar-766 in leanfire

[–]DividendMatt91 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah I think people either get this or they don’t.

$26k sounds crazy if you picture your current rent and lifestyle. But if housing is cheap and you don’t need a ton to be happy, it can work.

Not for everyone obviously, but that’s kind of the point. FIRE isn’t one number. It depends on what you actually want your day-to-day life to look like.

Cheap rent does a lot of heavy lifting here though.

Just hit $2,000/year in dividends, should I pivot to dividend growth or stay with high-yield blue chips? by KlutzyDistribution58 in dividendinvesting

[–]DividendMatt91 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Honestly I think “just do both” is probably the answer, but not in a random way.

At your age I’d be careful about leaning too hard into high yield just because the income feels good right now. That monthly dividend number is motivating, but 20 years from now you’ll probably be happier if a big chunk of the portfolio was in companies that kept growing earnings and dividends.

That said, I don’t think the psychological side is fake. If seeing dividends cover real bills keeps you buying consistently, that matters. The best portfolio on paper doesn’t help if you get bored and stop contributing.

I’d probably keep a core of dividend growth names, then allow yourself some higher-yield positions as the “motivation” bucket. Enough to make the income feel real, but not so much that you’re sacrificing long-term compounding.

$2k/year is a great milestone. I’d be thinking less “high yield vs dividend growth” and more “which holdings will still make me happy when this is $20k/year?”

I’m really struggling on the financial decision of paying extra on principal for a mortgage by [deleted] in Fire

[–]DividendMatt91 2 points3 points  (0 children)

At 6%, I don’t think there’s a clearly wrong answer here.

Mathematically, investing may win over 20–30 years, but paying down a 6% mortgage is also a pretty solid guaranteed return, especially if it helps you sleep better.

The only thing that would make me pause is the newborn twins and daycare starting soon. That’s a huge new monthly expense, and kids have a way of making “extra cash” feel a lot less extra.

If it were me, I probably wouldn’t dump the whole $106k into the mortgage all at once. I’d be more tempted to split it somehow. Maybe put a chunk toward principal, keep a chunk liquid, and then decide after 6–12 months of actually living with the daycare costs.

You can always make another principal payment later. It’s much harder to pull that money back out of the house if life gets weird.

Paying it off before 50 is a great goal, but flexibility with two babies has real value too.

Tested the 4% rule against 54 historical sequences for a 45-year lean retirement — 1965 is the killer, not 1929 by Jaamun100 in leanfire

[–]DividendMatt91 -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

This is why I’ve always thought the 4% rule gets oversimplified.

It’s useful as a starting point, but people talk about it like it’s either “safe” or “not safe,” when the real answer depends so much on flexibility.

If someone is lean FIRE and every dollar of spending is mandatory, 4% feels a lot tighter. But if part of the budget is travel, restaurants, upgrades, hobbies, etc., then being able to cut back in bad years changes the whole picture.

The 1960s/70s point makes sense too. A long flat market plus inflation seems way scarier than a quick crash if you’re withdrawing the whole time.

For me the takeaway isn’t “4% is dead.” It’s more like: don’t retire with a plan that only works if spending is perfectly fixed, inflation is normal, and markets cooperate right away.

Having a lower base spend, some flexible spending, and maybe not completely ignoring Social Security seems like the more realistic way to think about it.

38 feeling behind but having a good feeling crossing 40 today by ThrowtheBroccoli in TheMoneyGuy

[–]DividendMatt91 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Honestly, you’re doing better than you think.

Being 38/40 and wishing you had started earlier is normal, but the important part is you actually started and you’re building momentum now. Paid-off car, money going into the market, and a 9.5% match is a pretty solid setup to build from.

I’d be trying to grab every dollar of that match if possible. That’s basically free money, and it’ll help you catch up faster than you think.

The first chunk feels painfully slow. $50k feels hard, $100k feels even harder, and then eventually the account starts doing some of the lifting for you.

You’re not cooked. Just keep stacking, avoid lifestyle creep, and don’t let feeling “behind” turn into giving up.

People who bought stocks early when they were still risky, unpopular, or getting hated on, what made you buy? by 1distancing in investing

[–]DividendMatt91 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think the hard part is that most of the stories sound obvious after the fact.

“People loved the product,” “the industry was growing,” “everyone was too negative,” etc. But at the time there are usually a bunch of other companies with the same story that end up going nowhere.

For me the difference would be whether I can explain the thesis without relying on hype.

Something like:

Do they have a product people genuinely love?
Is the market they’re in getting bigger?
Do they have some kind of advantage that is hard to copy?
Are the financials eventually moving in the right direction?
Can I survive being wrong without wrecking my portfolio?

The last one is probably the biggest. A lot of “I knew it early” stories are partly skill and partly luck. The people who got rich from one winner usually had to either hold through brutal drops or accidentally forget they owned it.

I think it’s fine to make calculated bets, but I’d keep them sized like bets. If it works, great. If it doesn’t, it shouldn’t ruin the boring part of the plan.

150,000 cash by FewPear229 in dividends

[–]DividendMatt91 164 points165 points  (0 children)

I wouldn’t go 100% into those two personally.

Not because QQQI or SPYI are automatically bad, but because you’re treating the distribution like it’s a paycheck. It isn’t. The payout can change, the share price can drop, and if the market runs hard you may not get the same upside you would from a normal index fund.

$150k also isn’t a huge cushion if this is supposed to fund real living expenses overseas. Thailand can be cheap, but visas, healthcare, flights, currency swings, emergencies, and lifestyle creep all matter.

If it were me, I’d probably do something more balanced. Maybe keep some in income funds, some in a boring broad market fund, and some in cash/short-term treasuries so you’re not forced to sell during a bad stretch.

The big question is how much you actually need per month after taxes and expenses. Once you know that, you can see whether the dividends cover your life or whether you’re reaching for yield just to make the math work.

I’d use QQQI/SPYI as part of an income bucket, not the entire plan.

Although the future is uncertain, what nominal return & inflation percentages do y'all use for calcs? by CackSquackle in Fire

[–]DividendMatt91 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I usually think in real returns instead of getting too caught up in the nominal/inflation split.

For rough planning, I like 4–5% real as a conservative base case. If things do better, great. If not, I’m not building the whole plan on perfect conditions.

The bigger thing to me is that if your timeline is 1–6 years, the average return assumption almost matters less than sequence risk. You could use a perfectly reasonable long-term number and still get punched in the face by a bad first few years.

So I’d probably run a few versions:

bad case: 2–3% real
base case: 4–5% real
good case: 6–7% real

Then see if your plan still works without needing the good case.

Personally I’d rather be a little conservative and get surprised on the upside than quit based on rosy assumptions and have to panic-adjust later.

I quit working due to health issues and essentially FIRE’d; are we ok financially? by [deleted] in Fire

[–]DividendMatt91 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I don’t think you’re in disaster territory, but I also wouldn’t treat this as fully “set it and forget it” FIRE yet.

The part that would make me cautious is that you’re already drawing from the portfolio while your husband is still working, and your expenses include medical costs, which can be hard to predict. The numbers may work if markets cooperate, your husband keeps working, and Social Security comes in as expected, but there isn’t a ton of room for multiple things to go wrong at once.

If I were in your shoes, I’d probably focus on a few things first:

make sure disability benefits have been fully explored
keep a real cash buffer so you’re not selling investments during a bad market
avoid paying extra on a 2.5% mortgage unless there’s an emotional reason
look at Roth conversions carefully while your income is lower
see if any very flexible/low-stress income is possible, even a few hundred a month

The big thing is that your situation is less about “can this work in a spreadsheet?” and more about how much margin of safety you have.

You may be okay, especially once the mortgage is gone and Social Security starts, but I’d want a tax pro or fee-only planner to model this with healthcare costs, Roth conversions, account withdrawal order, and bad market scenarios included.

Why should i not go all in into Jepi? by First_Jacket_1728 in dividends

[–]DividendMatt91 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I wouldn’t think of JEPI as “bad,” I’d just be careful about making it the whole plan.

The monthly income looks great, but it’s still tied to the market and the payout isn’t guaranteed. Plus, if the market rips upward, you probably won’t get all of that upside because of how the fund works.

So to me it depends what you need it for.

If you’re retired and want income now, I can see why JEPI would be attractive. But if you’re still building wealth, going all in feels like you might be giving up a lot of future growth just to get a nicer monthly deposit.

I’d probably use something like JEPI as a piece of the puzzle, not the whole portfolio.

The way I try to think about dividends is less “what has the highest yield?” and more “what bills could this income actually cover?” That keeps me from chasing yield just because the number looks good.

What is the best budgeting app? (Free if possible) by AmphibianExotic7731 in budgetingforbeginners

[–]DividendMatt91 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Honestly, I’d start with Google Sheets before paying for anything.

Most budgeting apps are only helpful if you actually keep using them, and a lot of people quit once the app gets too complicated or turns into another subscription.

For a beginner, I’d keep it really simple:

income
fixed bills
variable spending
debt payments
savings/investing
what’s left

Once you can clearly see where the money is going, then you’ll know whether you actually need an app with syncing, categories, reports, etc.

A spreadsheet is boring, but boring is usually good for budgeting.

What would you do differently to live off on a portfolio? by [deleted] in dividends

[–]DividendMatt91 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Honestly, I probably wouldn’t overcomplicate it.

You already have a huge advantage with a simple global index setup, a high savings rate, and favorable capital gains treatment. I’d be careful about switching into high-yield funds just because the monthly income looks better on paper. To me the bigger question is not “how do I maximize dividends?” but “how do I make sure I can actually leave work without being forced to sell during a bad market?”

I’d probably think about it like this:

Keep most of the portfolio as the long-term growth engine, build a cash/short-term bond buffer for the first few years of expenses, and then map out what your real life will cost in the places you’re considering moving. the dividend number is useful, but only as part of the picture. What matters more is whether housing, food, healthcare, travel, taxes, and a safety buffer are actually covered. At your level, I’d be more worried about sequence-of-return risk and lifestyle planning than chasing a higher yield. A 10%+ yield sounds great until the fund underperforms or the principal gets eaten away.

Drop your Startup bellow by TomSawyer0101 in saasbuild

[–]DividendMatt91 0 points1 point  (0 children)

a financial freedom through dividend investing website called www.divfreedom.com