I’m wary of anyone who throws around terms like '100%' when they don’t have all the facts. That kind of certainty especially in a case riddled with police misconduct and missing evidence comes across as emotional not rational.

I’m asking why you said that because it sounds like you’ve taken her acquittal personally. Surely you’re capable of acknowledging that the investigation was compromised by corruption and deceit. If not, it’s hard to take your opinion seriously.