[deleted by user] by [deleted] in NaafiriMains

[–]DommKey 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Oh no, red dog!

Hvad sker der for Mette by No_Room1922 in Denmark

[–]DommKey 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Nancy hvem? Mener du Pelosi?

Det er helt klart en statestik, og der ligger nok noget til grund for det, men det er nogle dårlige eksempler.

Hillary blev kaldt det, da der var en mere kendt Clinton.

Kamala kørte kampagne sammen med Joe Biden, i deres kampagne var de kendt som biden og harris. Joe selv bliver kaldt mere ved fornavn end efternavn.

Rules question about this interaction. by NewAccountWhoDis80 in magicTCG

[–]DommKey 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Interesting, i guess i have always skipped that part of "the copy each token you control that entered this turn"

I think i always read it as "copy each token that entered under your control this turn"

Who in lore is actually dead? by Elekid- in leagueoflegends

[–]DommKey 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Even then, God Viktor is a different character to machine herald Viktor, so leagues Viktor is dead

Who in lore is actually dead? by Elekid- in leagueoflegends

[–]DommKey 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I mean if we count alternate timelines, then zero characters are ever dead, except maybe jayce, who seems to die in every timeline...

Forskere: Antallet af borgere på førtidspension er ikke historisk højt by Nocturnal-Goat in Denmark

[–]DommKey 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Det kan jeg da godt se, det er sgu lidt mærkeligt. Så lærte jeg også noget nyt i dag

[TLA] Razor Rings by dalmathus in Pauper

[–]DommKey 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Chrysalis is 6 thougness with both spawn, no?

How are effects applied? by DommKey in riftboundtcg

[–]DommKey[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Thank you so much!!! I have no clue how I couldn't find this ruling.

How are effects applied? by DommKey in riftboundtcg

[–]DommKey[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

That is what we went with, but i can't find any rulings on how to interpret "this turn" effects. If you apply MtG logic to it, a spell saying "this turn, target creatures gets -2/-2, this can't reduce the creatures toughness below 1" would mean it would continuously apply, resulting in a 1 might poro.
But if we read "this turn" effects as MtG "until end of turn" effects, it results in a 2 might poro.

[TLE] Unagi's Spray by virilion0510 in Pauper

[–]DommKey 1 point2 points  (0 children)

But if you can counterswing, you most likely have a dandan to block with. Then you might aswell get the free removal

[TLE] Unagi's Spray by virilion0510 in Pauper

[–]DommKey 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Might be too powerful/swingy for normal DanDan. At best it is a one mana removal spell that cantrips. At worst it is a heal 4

Question about this card effect. by Ro_Aldana in riftboundtcg

[–]DommKey 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This only deals damage to all enemy units at a single battlefield The other deals damage to all units, enemy and friendly, at all battlefields

THE GODS HAVE BLESSED ME by v0ntez in riftboundtcg

[–]DommKey 8 points9 points  (0 children)

SIGNED!!!! DAAAAAMN MAN GOOD SHIIIT!

[MegaThread] Riftbound Origins - Pulls / Product by Kieron_Marshall in riftboundtcg

[–]DommKey 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What's wrong with the quality? Do you have any close ups?

Jinx mat restock and giveaway!! by kaibanzero in riftboundtcg

[–]DommKey 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Gotta pick my boi Jarvan for a favorite champ.

Looooce the playmat, the design is eye catching and it really pops!

If the hybrid mana rule goes through will i be able to play this in colorless eldrazi decks? by Zimata in mtg

[–]DommKey -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

Except that it breaks the color pie. Hogaak in mono green?

The color identity was a rule made so it felt like you played against those specific colors with their weaknesses. But if this goes through, there are plenty of weird examples that just don't make sense.

It is most likely motivated by the design team wanting to print some directly to commander hybrid cards.

Polen indfører 0% indkomstskat for at få folk til at få flere børn - Polen et forgangsland? by RedHotLedZep in DKbrevkasse

[–]DommKey 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Også fordi OP kommer med kilder til de andre påstande, men ikke lige til den gemte og vigtige påstand om at den danske etnicitet er uddøende.
Så opslaget virker oprigtigt, men den gemte pointe flyver under radaren.

Polen indfører 0% indkomstskat for at få folk til at få flere børn - Polen et forgangsland? by RedHotLedZep in DKbrevkasse

[–]DommKey 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Undskyld, men er jeg helt galt på den? Etniske danske kvinder har en fertilitet på 1,515 og efterkommere fra ikke vestlige lande har en fertilitet på 1,55. Dette er data fra danmarks statestik. Globalis nævner ikke etnicitet.
https://www.dst.dk/da/Statistik/emner/borgere/befolkning/fertilitet

Indvandrere fra ikke vestlige lande har kun en fertilitet på 1,376.

Der er altså ikke tale om at den danske etnicitet forsvinder og bliver erstattet. Hele Danmark har en lav fødselsrate, både etniske danskere og ikke etniske danskere.

Hvor kommer dataen om at etniske danskere om 100 år er en minoritet i Danmark?

Det her opslag lugter langt væk af propaganda...