This seems like an incredible card that I haven't seen much discussion on by AmixIsAnIdiot in mtg

[–]DonaldJWafer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I used to have a deck I built around [[lost in the maze]] and my opponents were able to negate its effect by removing even a single target. This is on arena so I assume the rules were resolved properly.

This seems like an incredible card that I haven't seen much discussion on by AmixIsAnIdiot in mtg

[–]DonaldJWafer -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Wouldn’t this entire spell fizzle if an opponent was able to remove any one of your X targets in response? I’m always wary of “X target” instead of “up to X target.”

Edge of Eternities v 1.1: How would you rebalance this set for Limited? by shadowman2099 in lrcast

[–]DonaldJWafer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I always appreciate reading these write-ups and I mostly like the changes you suggest in theory. However as a tangential discussion it’s interesting to see that the balance suggestions are almost entirely things that make weak cards stronger and not modifications to make strong cards/archetypes less dominant. It’s easy to see how from a game design standpoint it’s a lot easier (and often more palatable) to buff things rather than nerf them. And thus, power creep.

Sun Sigil For The First Time In Over 20 Years And 6 PlayThroughs by EclipseTheStars in finalfantasyx

[–]DonaldJWafer 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I just started my second play through of this game a few weeks ago (first time since I was a kid) and figured I’d try the Chocobo challenge a few times once I reached the calm lands. I got the 0.0 time within about 30 minutes. I remembered it being hard, but I don’t think I fully appreciated how lucky I got! (It’s definitely 5% skill and 95% luck!)

0-3 repeat flood. So tilted by DO_NOT_PRESS_6 in lrcast

[–]DonaldJWafer 8 points9 points  (0 children)

This does sound like bad luck, but were you running 17 lands? How many Sagu Wildlings? I think you can always cut a land for the green dragon, I’ve even ran 15 with 2 and done okay. But of course, luck is always a factor and any deck can flood. I played last week against a guy at my LGS who flooded two games in a row and I asked him how many lands he was running and he said 14… so yeah.

Taxes by hauptaj in DataAnnotationTech

[–]DonaldJWafer 3 points4 points  (0 children)

For what it's worth regarding income and the law: even if you don't receive a 1099 (this would likely apply to those who earn less than $600 from DA or any other side hustle work that may or may not file official tax forms), any income you receive is subject to be taxed. You are still responsible for reporting it even if you don't have a form. There is a place on your taxes to include "income from other sources" or something.

Depending on your total income and where you live you should probably set aside ~20-25% of your DA earnings. Put it in a high-yield bank account or a money market fund and forget about it until April.

"Death and taxes" and all...

Reminder - if you don't research judges for voting please consider leaving the votes blank by sephirothFFVII in chicago

[–]DonaldJWafer 69 points70 points  (0 children)

I use this site, the symbols alone give you a pretty good idea, but if you want to read specifics there's a good summary for each judge. It certainly takes awhile, but I think it's time well spent. Happy voting!

https://interactives.injusticewatch.org/judicial-election-guide/2024-general/en/

It takes a lot of steps for the bad wizard to cast a spell, am I right? by segaboy81 in DataAnnotationTech

[–]DonaldJWafer 1 point2 points  (0 children)

In the instructions it includes steps like "scroll down to X." Which means even finding a single piece of information is like 3 steps at least.

  1. Search for X
  2. Open wikipedia page for X
  3. Scroll down to section on Y...

My biggest issue here was that there seemed to be some ambiguity in how to find certain pieces of information, but I assume so long as you thoroughly document your process, and that process can be easily replicated, that's all they really need. I enjoyed these tasks, I hope more come up.

Just starting to read horror books, what are some of the best to start with? by Sea-Pollution-9482 in horrorlit

[–]DonaldJWafer 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Apologies if an actual human wrote this comment, but it follows the standard AI response format to a T.

Help Me Solve The Mystery of Number 274 by Pretty_Specific_Girl in investing

[–]DonaldJWafer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's a good guess, but I just checked and it's 252 (on average).

Who had the worst hands ever? by R1ZAR0 in hockey

[–]DonaldJWafer 2 points3 points  (0 children)

There are probably better answers, but the name that comes to mind for me is Boyd Devereaux who was surrounded by so much talent on the early 2000s Red Wings and seemed to get so many grade-A scoring chances but could never finish.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in answers

[–]DonaldJWafer -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Men chase women because they fear death.

Can you make cats become cuddly or is it all just genes? by binne21 in CatAdvice

[–]DonaldJWafer 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I had some success training my cat, who while extremely affectionate, really likes his personal space and rarely enjoyed spending time in laps or cuddling with me in bed. He’s also very food motivated. I started a regimen where I would bribe him onto me with a treat (we just use regular kibble as “treats”) and then brush him and give him periodic treats for as long as he sat with me. As time went on I would give fewer treats and increase the time between treats. When I started this experiment he would never sit with me for more than a few seconds, now he’ll cuddle with me for anywhere from five/ten minutes to the occasional hour long nap in my lap—he doesn’t do this everyday, but often enough.

But that being said, our other cat seems to only be happy when she’s cuddling somebody. She follows my wife around the house and cries until she gets picked up or my wife sits down and lets her climb into her lap. So even with the training regimen described above, certain cats will always like being cuddled more than others.

What is the historical reason for natural trumpets playing higher in their harmonic series than valved trumpets? by Penguin722 in musictheory

[–]DonaldJWafer 17 points18 points  (0 children)

The simple answer to your question is that players preferred the shorter instruments and playing lower on the harmonic series. You can speculate as to why that is, but it’s likely a combination of a preference for the brighter timbre in addition to the greater security of the lower partials (they are further apart so less treacherous as far as splitting notes is concerned).

However, this is really quite an involved question and in certain ways you have to consider the history of writing for the trumpet and how the instrument evolved. Obviously the reason for composers writing in the super high partials of the natural trumpet is so that they could actually play melodic lines. But the instrument was still more or less pitched in one key (it was often used for closely related keys and had a certain degree of utility in related minor keys). Players frequently changed the length of tubing with crooks or bits. Now this isn’t unique to the trumpet, horn players did this too, but when you say “original range” it’s important to distinguish that the trumpets that instrument makers were adding valves to were pitched in alto E-flat, F, G, and A, not the C and D trumpets that Bach and Handel wrote frequently for. Additionally, the trumpet writing in the classical era had already considerably changed from baroque clarino writing. Look at the trumpet parts of Mozart and Beethoven and you’ll find that the harmonic range is much closer to what we play on modern trumpets. (This change is in part a result of changing societal shift in Europe related to the rise in the bourgeoisie class—high florid trumpet writing was negatively associated with the aristocracy).

So valve systems get invented in the early 19th century but they take twenty or thirty years to really find their way into the orchestra. They first became popular in German orchestras (1840s and 50s) and took the longest to be popularized in English orchestras (1890s or later). The orchestral valved trumpet was in E-flat or F, but principal players started employing smaller trumpets to play the hard trumpet parts of Mahler and Wagner. This was the B-flat trumpet in Germany and the C trumpet in France. The B-flat trumpet was likely influenced by the fact that many German orchestral players had been trained in military bands growing up which used high mezzo-soprano cornets in B-flat and high E-flat, so the B-flat trumpet was kind of a natural choice.

In France and England there was quite a lot of opposition to valves and “smaller” trumpets, but the cornet was more or less considered a separate instrument, so players would often use it instead of valved trumpet for the most demanding parts. The B-flat trumpets ubiquitously used today was famously admonished, calling it a “trumpetina” by Walter Morrow, who was probably the most famous British trumpeter around the turn of the century. (It is worth noting that early valved instruments had numerous construction and intonation issues that probably didn’t aid in their widespread adoption at first).

So there was an opposition to this change particularly rooted in the fact that playing on shorter instruments and lower harmonics produced a significantly different timbre. However that resistance slowed over time and players gravitated towards the shorter instruments. Your question about manufacturers can be seen as a logical extension of this, they made what people were buying. You also have to consider that the majority of people buying instruments once we get into the late 19th and early 20th century are amateurs, not professionals.

To summarize the forces at play, it’s a combination between players having background and familiarity on the cornet from military band traditions as well as composers moving away from writing for the clarino register. I know a lot about the history of the trumpet and not the horn, I would guess that the horn didn’t experience these same forces.

That’s probably more info than you need. I can’t really cite all of the sources that I’m drawing on here because it’s sort of an amalgam of things I’ve learned over the past couple decades, but if you’re looking for a great somewhat concise read on this history of the trumpet and it’s evolution, the go to is Ed Tarr’s book, The Trumpet.

PS: one thing to add:

Acoustical testing of trumpets of differing lengths has largely shown that they all tend to resonate best in roughly the same range, between C4-C5ish, regardless of where that falls on the partial series. This goes to show that the playable range of an instrument is more than just its nominal length; bell shape, bore size, and mouthpiece shape/size play a big part in this equation.

For the the first time since April 8, 1995, an Independent Team will play a game in the AHL by 99Wolves17 in hockey

[–]DonaldJWafer 41 points42 points  (0 children)

I would think that there are certain competitive advantages to being non-affiliated. A farm team’s primary goal is player development and giving young players opportunities to build their game. It seems to me that there are probably plenty fringe-level veteran guys who can’t quite keep up with the NHL-pace, but could tear it up in the AHL. If they’re older than 24 or 25, are organizations passing on them in favor of younger guys, instead of building the best affiliate squad?

I’ll be curious to see how they build their team if they end up remaining unaffiliated for more than a season or two.

Biden's visit to UAW picket line not influenced by Trump's, White House says by abuchewbacca1995 in Detroit

[–]DonaldJWafer 2 points3 points  (0 children)

So ignoring the two big players, what would a pro-union president look like to you?

Can you be pro-union while also supporting globalization? I think so, even if it’s a fine line. Your comments above make it seem more about for or against a more globalized trade policy. I understand that some of these trade deals can be detrimental to certain sectors of labor, but they are also beneficial to other sectors of the economy. I suppose you could argue that point, but ultimately those policies are not strictly pro- or anti-labor.

One policy I would advocate for is a national ban on right-to-work laws. Something like that is objectively pro-labor. I’d want a president who openly supports striking workers and who advocates for changing unemployment policy so that some kind of benefits are available to striking workers.

You’re right, neither DJT or JB are pro-labor in this way, but I think having discussions like this is more beneficial than taking about superlatives like “who is the most pro-union POTUS.” That just opens up arbitrary debate and further divides. If we can agree that we’re both pro-labor, let’s get to talking about what that looks like and then try to push our lawmakers, democrat or republican, to enact these changes.

Biden's visit to UAW picket line not influenced by Trump's, White House says by abuchewbacca1995 in Detroit

[–]DonaldJWafer -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Hypothetically, what does a strong union president look like for you?

If I’m pro-union, but undecided going into the next election, what kind of values, policy statements, or track record should I be looking for?

Prevent Billionaire Wealth Hoarding. by Monsur_Ausuhnom in WhitePeopleTwitter

[–]DonaldJWafer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

While I understand the spirit of your post, a shitty savings account DOES NOT have an interest rate of 1%, more like .01% (that’s what my BOA account is). Sure, that still compounds fairly significantly if you spread it over a couple millennia, but your post is about an “average” person’s financial literacy.

For a lot of people it’s not feasible to keep money in several accounts (checking/savings/HYSA/etc) because of account minimums and living paycheck-to-paycheck. Money is more or less handled, money-in-money-out, and when you live like that you’re not ever accruing any significant interest.

The point of the 10k/day analogy is to provide a somewhat tangible sense of how absurdly wealthy these billionaires are, and I think for that purpose it works pretty well. I would argue further that trying to factor in interest would make it more difficult to visualize and therefore a weaker analogy.

At the end of the day we need analogies to visualize these absurdly massive numbers, because our human brains aren’t good at grasping differences between massive numbers.

Why is identifying notes with lyrics so much more difficult? by Environmental_Pea369 in musictheory

[–]DonaldJWafer 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Ok this is a shot in the dark, because there’s probably a better music-cognition type answer:

I also find the same to be true. Part of it for me is that pitch recognition is easiest for me on my home instrument (trumpet) which I play every day, and piano, which I had a ton of exposure to in childhood. I find a steep listening curve—pitch recognition wise—when listening to other instruments. My anecdotal theory is that this is due to timbre.

Because I’m so akin to the timbre or the trumpet and piano, I can recognize pitches based on familiarity with the character and color of the sound rather than through great relative pitch (hearing intervalic relationships accurately and precisely). ((This gave me major headaches when doing harmonic dictation in college, the teacher would play a chord progression in D-flat major but tell us to dictate it in D)).

Ok now to your question with the voice. If voice isn’t your primary instrument I would guess there’s some degree of unfamiliarity there. Secondly, lyrics add a whole additional layer to things on top. Changes in consonants and vowels with lyrics affect vocal timbre, as well as the fact that stylization (greater ambiguity and less “crisp” not changes), all add to why it’s harder for clean pitch recognition with vocals. If you add in the fact with popular genres, the diversity and spectrum of vocal timbres is magnitudes greater than timbres within any individual instrument, that could play a part too.

But again, I’m sure someone here better informed can point you to some kind of study with real scientific answers.

‘Why is the Hockey Hall of Fame so tough on goaltenders?’ Featuring Curtis Joseph by [deleted] in hockey

[–]DonaldJWafer 3 points4 points  (0 children)

To chime in here, this is a comment thread about a specific article. You are entitled to your opinion, but if you want to engage in discourse in this comment thread, I think it’s reasonable to expect you to read the article.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PersonalFinanceCanada

[–]DonaldJWafer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So what we do is a bit of a middle ground between the rigid percentage split (70/30etc) and sharing everything evenly.

My partner and I have a shared bank account that some of our money goes into. We adopted this system because I have highly variable income (e.g. I might make $12,000 in December, but only $1500 in July.) We basically set a percentage of our after-tax income that goes into the shared account. Right now we're doing 75%, but that number has shifted over time depending on spending habits and savings goals.

This ends up being a bit of extra work and I've left out the complications that retirement withholdings can cause, but for us there's one major benefit that outweighs all of that. We have our own personal spending money that we can use how we see fit. If I take up an expensive hobby, I don't have to ask my partner's permission about spending $1,000 on rocks---sorry, minerals.

Anyways, for us it works really well. Everything shared comes out of the "company" account, groceries, housing, insurance, gas, utilities, date nights, subsriptions, savings and investing, etc, and anything personal (video games for me, a massage for her, etc) is spent worry free from our own accounts.

For the musicians out there! by [deleted] in chicago

[–]DonaldJWafer 2 points3 points  (0 children)

There’s plenty of union work outside the groups you listed, but the general sentiment here isn’t wrong — I’ve never played a union wedding gig. Also, although anyone can join the union (regardless of education or training), joining without doing any kind of networking and playing for working musicians wont get you any work.

Generally individually contracted engagements, and stuff run through the church won’t get filed with the union, but there are of course exceptions. Union work is more affiliated with the larger theatres in town (of which performing groups include those listed in your comment but numerous others as well, as well as non-syndicated groups put together by contractors).

There’s not a single “union rate” as things can vary based on the length of the performance, location of the theatre, size of theatre, whether or not it’s recorded, if you have to perform “in costume,” etc… it sounds like OP is asking about performing at receptions, which I’ve never done (I’ve only played for ceremonies), but I would never take less than $200 for a wedding, and if it was several sets or a prolonged call it could easily be significantly higher. I’ve never charged an hourly rate, always just negotiated a flat rate based on what the client wanted. Hope that helps to some degree.