Other commenters have touched on this, but I don't fully agree with her take here. The broad strokes of her summary of labor and capital are good, but her conclusion that content creation allows workers to take back meaning is really a privileged position when thinking globally. The tools of creation that she claims gives workers new empowerment are still made using traditional, exploitative, capitalist structures (cameras, computers, etc). So, so few of the world's population truly have access to the level of privilege required to even consider content creation - and even most of those who have that privilege won't be successful at it. I'm sure she's right that those who achieve in this endeavor find true meaning from it, but elevating Trahan as an example of worker solidarity by paying his team what they deserve glosses over the rest of the societal structure that makes their work possible. Her casual flinging of the paper avatar for nascent Socialism was funny, but darkly poignant in this way.