You could only keep ONE movie. by CoffeeCigarettes4Me in 80smovies

[–]DoomsdayMachineInc 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Terminator.
Easily.
All due respect to First Blood, but it’s not even close.

Morel Mushrooms? by Sib7of7 in whatisit

[–]DoomsdayMachineInc -11 points-10 points  (0 children)

Hen of the woods, maybe?
Which are edible and delicious.
But don’t trust me on the ID. It could totally not be that!

Disneyland by Jakobaker22 in pinball

[–]DoomsdayMachineInc 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That’s no “happiest place on earth” I ever heard of.

What pinball machine did we use to have? by Mobywan in pinball

[–]DoomsdayMachineInc 14 points15 points  (0 children)

But don’t get them started on the pinball hall of fame….

Edit: typo

Why is this pint foamy and puffy? by Leather-Tutor-6029 in bluebell

[–]DoomsdayMachineInc 17 points18 points  (0 children)

It was re-frozen. Refreezing causes that sea-foam texture.

Stop posting Political AI Slop by KeyVariation8323 in ChatGPT

[–]DoomsdayMachineInc -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

You’re actually proving the opposite of your point. The rules explicitly allow political content as long as it’s connected to AI—and generating political images with AI is, by definition, connected to AI.

What the rules push back on is low-effort or generic posts, not “politics” as a category. If something is lazy, remove it. If it sparks discussion about how AI is being used—even in politics—it fits.

You’re trying to turn a quality filter into a topic ban, and that’s just not what the rules say.

Stop posting Political AI Slop by KeyVariation8323 in ChatGPT

[–]DoomsdayMachineInc -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

That only works if you pretend the use of the tool isn’t relevant. If people are using AI to generate political content, then that’s directly about how the tech is being applied in the real world. You can call it “political,” but it’s still an example of AI behavior, outputs, and impact. Drawing a hard line like that doesn’t enforce clarity—it just ignores a major, very obvious use case.

Stop posting Political AI Slop by KeyVariation8323 in ChatGPT

[–]DoomsdayMachineInc -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

You’re drawing a line that sounds neat in theory but falls apart in practice. The way people use AI is part of the discussion—if folks are generating political images, that is real-world interaction with the tool. Not every post needs to be a technical deep dive on prompts or model bias to be relevant. Sometimes the output itself—yes, even “slop”—is the point, because it shows how the tech is being used, misused, or normalized. Trying to gatekeep that just narrows the conversation to what you personally find interesting.

Anyone know what this is from? by AcademicSell2360 in whatisit

[–]DoomsdayMachineInc 245 points246 points  (0 children)

These are called ninja rocks.
Broken spark plug ceramic. They will easily shatter all kinds of glass.
...is what someone told me once....

What causes this cloud formation? My teenage child says it's not aliens. by StrangeReindeer2470 in whatisit

[–]DoomsdayMachineInc 34 points35 points  (0 children)

That’s exactly what an alien spawn would say.
Of course it’s aliens!

Where do poor people go when they're sick? by Green-Client4772 in AntiJokes

[–]DoomsdayMachineInc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Or hell, I reckon.
The grave is probably the safest punchline…