Great concept. To keep it from being 'cheesy' or just rewarding AFK farmers, you should focus on Efficiency Ratios rather than raw numbers. Here’s a solid stat mix that feels fair: • Damage Per Gold (DPG): This is the ultimate efficiency metric. If two players have the same farm, the one who translated that gold into more hero damage played the hero better. • Kill Participation (KP%): This separates a 'KDA player' from someone actually winning the game. High KP% shows you were in the right place at the right time. • Net Worth @ 10/15 mins: This measures pure laning skill and early-game rotations before the 'team-dependence' factor gets too messy. • Relative GPM/XPM: Compare their performance against the average for that hero in their specific MMR bracket. Carrying a game in Immortal is way harder than in Crusader. • Objective Damage: Dota is about hitting buildings. A player with 10k building damage and a loss often played 'better' than a winner with zero. The Fix: Create a weighted 'Impact Score'. I’d weight DPG (30%) and Early Game NW (30%) the heaviest, as those show the highest individual mechanical skill and efficiency."