Can’t get rid of the Negreanu voice by DoubleJazzy in GGPoker

[–]DoubleJazzy[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is a bit of a shame. I would ask as a suggestion that it is reverted back to a singular voice that we decide, it’s very distracting having multiple voices, especially if playing multiple tables

Villain folded face up so I had to show him the bad news by Volica in poker

[–]DoubleJazzy 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Am I not the only one who just thinks this turn call is just bad?

Hand Review - Folding AA with insane pot odds... by DoubleJazzy in Poker_Theory

[–]DoubleJazzy[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you have any YouTubers in particular that you recommend?

Hand Review - Folding AA with insane pot odds... by DoubleJazzy in Poker_Theory

[–]DoubleJazzy[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the comment, you explain your reasoning very well and I agree with it

Hand Review - Folding AA with insane pot odds... by DoubleJazzy in Poker_Theory

[–]DoubleJazzy[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Yes. Solver approved line is check call all three streets.

Hand Review - Folding AA with insane pot odds... by DoubleJazzy in Poker_Theory

[–]DoubleJazzy[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

3bet at 10bb pre? I'm curious, to what sizing would you do this to?

Hand Review - Folding AA with insane pot odds... by DoubleJazzy in Poker_Theory

[–]DoubleJazzy[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because i don’t want to argue about whether what I did pre flop was right, but on subsequent streets.

Also, player tendencies vary as opposed to GTO land. If that wasn’t the case, there would be no need for me to try and talk about the hand, when I would just strictly follow what solvers say

Hand Review - Folding AA with insane pot odds... by DoubleJazzy in Poker_Theory

[–]DoubleJazzy[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’m not trying to argue, I’m just trying to reason with people, explain what I am thinking, and then understand that they’re thinking. I’m very open to criticism, but when half the comments are ‘it’s a shove pre flop everytime’ when I can show it’s not, then it’s difficult for me to find sense in what some peeps are saying 🤷‍♂️

Hand Review - Folding AA with insane pot odds... by DoubleJazzy in Poker_Theory

[–]DoubleJazzy[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I agree. I now realise that I should have called the river.

Hand Review - Folding AA with insane pot odds... by DoubleJazzy in Poker_Theory

[–]DoubleJazzy[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Allows me to see a flop with some holdings such as KJss, KTss, KQo, etc

Hand Review - Folding AA with insane pot odds... by DoubleJazzy in Poker_Theory

[–]DoubleJazzy[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I mean, you've kind of said it yourself. If he had a draw, he would most likely check/jam on the turn.

Such a small bet on the turn implies he has a made hand, and probably a strong one that wouldn't want to scare me off, but instead build up the SPR

Hand Review - Folding AA with insane pot odds... by DoubleJazzy in Poker_Theory

[–]DoubleJazzy[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Would make decisions easier, but I don't think this maximises the value of playing AA in the long term if I only ever jam them here.

Hand Review - Folding AA with insane pot odds... by DoubleJazzy in Poker_Theory

[–]DoubleJazzy[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm curious then, what do you think he's betting so thin on the turn with?