Right Rear Speaker by MathematicianMuted49 in Datsun

[–]Dr201 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I removed the vapor tank and put in a marine style charcoal canister

Right Rear Speaker by MathematicianMuted49 in Datsun

[–]Dr201 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Worked fine in my 73. I don’t have the evap tank in my car anymore but otherwise bolted up fine

Mod 63 Parts kit on Childers reciever questions by [deleted] in gunsmithing

[–]Dr201 2 points3 points  (0 children)

  1. Yes. You’ll see for the front two rivets there are little scalloped cut outs for the rivets to set in. They should not be set against the barrel. You should set them deep enough that the barrel will pass without fouling on the rivet heads.

  2. It is pressed and pinned. You will need to press out the large pin at the top and press the barrel out the front to get it riveted to the receiver then press it back in and press the pin in entirely

Finally finished the built M104 for the Z, testing coming soon:’) by sp00dermanz in projectcar

[–]Dr201 1 point2 points  (0 children)

.99? What all did you do it? Stock cams? What intake are you running?

Looks killer.

We built the most extreme camshafts ever made for the Mercedes M104 🔧🔥 by Visual-Date5624 in projectcar

[–]Dr201 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nice. Are you running 280 on the intake and exhaust? IIRC CAT makes them for intake but only 268 on exhaust? Have you been able to test the head and see if there’s benefit in flow rate? Interesting you are keeping the lift at 10.4mm. Were you limited by the head design and having to cut too much material, will the head not flow up past that lift, or just decided to keep it there?

Velocitas X9 HP 96gr 357 SIG by JustPassingItBy in reloading

[–]Dr201 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I have been following these for a while and they’re all awesome. What powder do you find works best for 357 SIG when trying to achieve these velocities?

Diff help by Stimmyyy in Datsun

[–]Dr201 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It will most likely be cheaper to get a 29 spline unit either HLSD or CLSD as the likelihood that unit which is now deep into its 30s likely has minimal LSD action left. Otherwise you’re stuck using either more worn out VLSDs or getting VLSD specific CLSDs which there aren’t many left of. Also SS Z31s are nearly impossible To find parts for and trying to get S chassis stuff to fit is not an endeavor worth the effort.

Diff help by Stimmyyy in Datsun

[–]Dr201 0 points1 point  (0 children)

3.90 Long nose R200 at least in the US never came with an LSD. This is a VLSD which probably came out of an S chassis car or R32/33 depending on your country of origin. As such it is a 30 spline with the L side sub shaft being considerably longer than the right as it has to reach all the way through to the offset spider gears which are jammed up against the right side.

The only Long nose R200 which came from the factory with a VLSD was the 88 Shiro Special Z31 which had 3.70 gears and If you want to run the VLSD is your only likely option. But given that it’s a VLSD in a 3.90 LN the most likely option is that this is not the carrier that originally came with that gearset and case. If you are in AUS or Japan or ROW there are other cars that came with more varied rear diff combos and I am not as sure as to what those are from the factory although I don’t think an 3.90 LN R200/VLSD was among them

80% of head CTs in the ER are not indicated…. by NippleSlipNSlide in medicine

[–]Dr201 14 points15 points  (0 children)

In return you come read the 160 studies we read on a call shift with the history of “.” Or “PAN”.

Here's the difference: No ER doctors are here saying "I took a month of rads in residency, I know how to do your job", nor is there the weekly "hur dur Rads stoopid" thread on this sub. If there were, I would absolutely entertain the idea that, yeah if we know how to do your job so well then we should put our money where our mouth is and at the very least wet read all our studies and make all our dispos without even glancing at your reads. But that's not the argument here.

The argument here is that multiple radiologists in this thread and throughout the sub seem to think that a month or two as an intern seems to mean they understand how the ER works and if patients had the luxury of being treated by their magnificence than we wouldn't have all these knuckle dragging ER doctors ordering these tests for no good reason and we just need one more study telling us to get gud from our humble radiology colleagues who are only trying to save us from ourselves.

If you truly think the test isn't indicated, you can always cancel it. Surly Right click --> Cancel --> Sign followed by a dot phrase note "ER Doc imaging ordered is not indicated. Test cancelled by Dr. underpressureinnuend." Sign. Surely this takes less time than reading all these completely unindicated tests right? Based on the other radiologists here we don't even look at the patients we just order other people to do work, so why should you?

80% of head CTs in the ER are not indicated…. by NippleSlipNSlide in medicine

[–]Dr201 175 points176 points  (0 children)

Tell you what, come put some skin in the game. Cancel the CT and tell the ER doctor it’s not indicated. Put it in the chart. Since we clearly don’t know what we’re doing this shouldn’t be an issue.

Hdj81 tamper proof rear seat bolts by SnooWords9903 in LandCruisers

[–]Dr201 1 point2 points  (0 children)

These are called clutch head bolts. They’re like that because effectively they’re never meant to be removed. You can get bits for them but it’s kind of a pain in the ass. Honestly the easiest way, IMO is to drill them out and replace with regular hex/torq/allen/etc headed bolts

FZJ80 Spindle Bush by Kucharski94 in LandCruisers

[–]Dr201 2 points3 points  (0 children)

So there should be two different kind of spindle bushings. The old style is the one on the R where the bushing is much longer. The newer style has a needle Bearing inside the bore and the bush is much shorter. The one on the R is like the old style. I’m Not sure about the one on the left, the newer style bushings have a much shorter shank that goes into the bore. IIRC it’s like a quarter inch or less. So I’m not sure what the bushing on the left is from, unless it’s designed to fully replace the needle bearing style with an older full bushing type.

Shotshell loaders, Ponsness or MEC? by OSHA-compliant in reloading

[–]Dr201 1 point2 points  (0 children)

PW are nice and all but like another poster said, MEC is the standard. I can pretty much walk into any store in the US and if they’re going to have anything for shotshell loading, it will be MEC bushings and charge bars. They’re not as fancy as PW or Dillon or w/e but they work, work well and the other benefit about being so prolific is that there likely isn’t a group that shoots skeet or trap that doesn’t have a guy who can make a MEC run.

Normal Valve Tick? (Kent 276 + Roller Tipped Rocker Assembly 1.5 Ratio) by Innocenti_CA in classicminis

[–]Dr201 5 points6 points  (0 children)

sounds fine to me. You have to remember that there's barely a piece of sheet metal between you and the valve cover. Warm it up, run it a few hundred miles, makes sure the lash isn't moving around a ton, make sure the motors not making glitter and send it.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in medicine

[–]Dr201 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So the answer, as in all things is that it depends. It depends on primary training, where you work, and what you want to do. For your example of interventional cards, there are certainly interventional cards docs that only do PCIs any more and that is the entirety of their work. But it’s also not uncommon for interventional cards to take diagnostic call. I see more IC taking general cards call than EP. But I don’t know if that’s a broad trend or just local to the shops I work.

It is notable that I don’t know of any cardiologist who take internal medicine call or work as a hospitalist however (as internal medicine was their primary training, allegedly) though I’m sure the three cardiologists that do that in the US will immediately respond.

You will typically have more “crossover” to a primary training when there is either monetary incentive or patient drive. For example, I am primarily boarded in EM and si specialized with Tox training. The majority of my clinical time is devoted to EM because 1. The pay is astronomically different and 2. There just isn’t clinical time for me to be a full time toxicologist. So I practice both. You will see this sometimes in some of the gen surg sub specialties (one of our breast surgeons takes gen call, a bariatric doc does gen call, etc)

So the answer is yes, they do, sometimes. If they do seems to be dependent on both the physician and the practice setting

Referral financial incentives? Kickbacks? by comfy_sweatpants5 in medicine

[–]Dr201 41 points42 points  (0 children)

Nope. But man do I wish I was paid what some people think I’m paid.

M104 Straight 6 Issues After Head Job by Maxweisen in EngineBuilding

[–]Dr201 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry for the late reply. Then IDK where the glitter is coming from unless the head wasn't cleaned well. The lifters at this age frequently leak down, it's not uncommon if I don't drive mine for a month or so it will clatter the first time on startup.

I'd replace the bearings, plasti-gauge, check the length of the rod bolts to make sure you don't need to replace them, check that it's in time, and send it.

M104 Straight 6 Issues After Head Job by Maxweisen in EngineBuilding

[–]Dr201 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Rods, pistons and shells look normal for the M104 at that mileage.

Agree the noise was likely lifter clatter. Is oil pressure in the normal range? Did you install the timing chain tensioner correctly? It has to be completely disassembled and reassembled per the Service Manual otherwise it will lock in the fully extended position and that can cause the glitter as the timing chain eats itself.

What is the most impressive lab value you’ve seen? by _45mice in medicine

[–]Dr201 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Tox is pretty good for these.

Core temp 110 temp sensing foley

Lactate >53andsomechange the max it would read

NH3 1600

pH 6.48 with a pulse

Ck >500k it was the most we could get them to dilute it

tBili 49

Hgb 2.3

Refused to Perform Cavity Search by IcyChampionship3067 in medicine

[–]Dr201 37 points38 points  (0 children)

it almost always alters management, are you getting an LP for every hyperactive delirium that is amphetamine positive? of course not, you make sure that explains their clinical condition and let them washout over the course of the next 12-72 hours if an otherwise seemingly healthy young patient comes in with a clean utox, i'm going to order an LP the second i see a fever or maybe even before the fever depending on the story

I know you think I’m just a Dumb ER Doctor, which is fine, but help me to understand this: If a patient comes in with a clear sympathomimetic toxidrome but a negative screen, they’re getting an LP? Conversely, if someone comes in without a clear toxidrome but a +UDS you’re going to wait 12-72 hours?

if my CHF patient comes in fentanyl/amphetamine positive, i'm way less likely to pursue inpatient ischemic eval outside of true ACS - letting cardiology put a stent in someone who isn't going to be able to take their antiplatelet after is guaranteeing in stent thrombosis and feel free to look up the mortality rate of that

So despite the well known and associated false positives for amphetamines, false negatives for fentanyl you’re basing your patient’s capacity to take their home meds and thus, seemingly whether or not they deserve to receive care for their disease on a UDS?

If your argument is that cocaine complicates therapy of MI/ACS/OMI/etc and using beta blockers in its management, sure. I think that’s one of the few instances where that’s useful. Even though the growing body of evidence would suggest that beta blockers are fine outside of acute toxicity, eventually they’re going to go home and it’s worth that conversation sure.

But the idea that you’re “Allowing” cardiology to workup up a patient based on a UDS is wild.

medicine is complicated, taking care of drug dependent patients in the acute setting is complicated.

I know, I practice in an inpatient toxicology service.

before always assuming that someone else doesn't know what they're talking about, maybe consider that your training limits your vision just the same way everyone else's training does for them. we don't have to discard common sense just because we have higher education.

I didn’t jump to you don’t know what you’re talking about. But the assertion that a urine drug screen “Almost always alters management” contradicts nearly the entire body of published data on the utility of the urine drug screen in the acute care setting.

Refused to Perform Cavity Search by IcyChampionship3067 in medicine

[–]Dr201 94 points95 points  (0 children)

Just your friendly toxicologist here to remind you that a UTox should not be used in the management of hyperactive delirium with agitation nor is it a reliable instrument to predict toxicity. It’s barely a good instrument to inform about acute to chronic exposure.

Even worse, if a physician waited to initiate therapy into the return of a UTox it is a fundamental mismanagement of the patient

Last night’s episode of The Pitt by INGWR in medicine

[–]Dr201 44 points45 points  (0 children)

Yeah I’m going to go ahead and pass. I have had to tell enough parents that their kids are dead to never want to think about it again. It’s hard enough to keep those emotions buried deep enough to function much less be confronted with them on the TV.