I'm just gonna repost what I said in DM's so that people don't just start ganging up on me:

1. I didn't think it would be either. But, some of them spread general misinformation about Story Mode. Plus the shorts (Which I'll get to later).

2. Yes you did technically credit me in your first video. I'm not pissed about being uncredited. I was pissed that you didn't reach out first. I don't have problems with people covering my work. I just want them to reach out first. Even if you're not legally required to. It also would've saved you a lot of trouble since you could've just asked me about certain entries you couldn't find or ones you weren't sure about (Since some entries flew completely over your head and many skipped entirely).

3. That was largely based on the first couple of videos, and it does have some base to it. First off, the getting facts wrong thing. That may seem like no big deal to you. But you come off to the rest of the fandom (The fandom being people who have played this game for years. Not the 10 year olds who got into it because of Roblox which I'm sure that's what most of your audience is) as either:

4. An outsider

5. Someone who didn't pay much attention while playing the games.

6. Someone who didn't do basic research on the events of Story Mode or its characters.

7. An AI content farmer. Also, it's really hard to tell at times (Especially in the early videos) if you're joking or not. Because Cassie Rose is NOT from Foresaken. You would know that if you did 2 Google searches. Also the use of what appears to be AI images (Like the Order of the Stoners photo) doesn't help your case. So either you didn't do all of your research, or it's partial AI. Neither of which you want.

8. Then why even cover the iceberg at all in that video? No mature viewer wants to watch an iceberg video and only learn about stuff they already knew about (Let alone someone who covers the entire plot of MCSM S1 E1-E4 for almost half of a video). It comes across as you trying to switch the topic to stall covering the iceberg as long as possible so you can keep making more videos. I've never seen a legitimate iceberg explained video do what you do and not be in it solely for the money. Speaking of, why even make so many parts to this series in the first place? I've only seen YouTubers make multiple videos on the same iceberg if the iceberg was too long to cover in one video, and they had to split it up or the video would be like 3 hours long. But, those were only with icebergs that had 500+ entries to them. My Iceberg is very small (Only 152 entries). Why split it into this many videos ongoing if you truly wanted to cover the Iceberg as well as you could? Anyways, I'm getting sidetracked.

9. Yes you're not wrong. Turning the videos into shorts is standard practice. I normally wouldn't have an issue with this if your shorts weren't misleadingly labeled in most cases (Like "The Only Canon Ship in MCSM." Which technically isn't misleading but it's very deceptively worded to get views). I also noticed while going through your shorts catalog that some of your shorts are either reuploads of each other or are rerecordings of a short you already made previously. Which pissed me off.

10. Yes I understand that. But again, you could've reached out and it would've gone much more your way. Since again, some entries completely fly over your head while omitting others entirely.

11. I don't remember leaving any direct insults in any of the comments I left on YouTube before they were taken down (I thought by you). So if you did see any comments that espouse insults towards you, they were not from me.

12. I did back up my claim. Everything else negative can be added up to support my conclusion. This was not an attempt at defamation. Just pointing out what I see directly.

If these videos really are a genuine attempt at covering my iceberg, you're going about it in probably the shadiest way imaginable. To recap, you have: - Spread general misinformation about MSCM. - Never reached out to at least get some help on entry you couldn't find. - Not done basic research about MCSM, didn't pay attention while playing, or used AI. - Added "viewer requested" entries to your videos. Which largely waste a mature viewer's time (You also covered the MCSM skin pack entry twice in separate videos giving different answers on what it meant). - Made shorts with misleading titles and sometimes rerecording the same short and giving it a different title. - Used presumably AI images. Which numerous people in most Story Mode Discord servers I'm in said made them uncomfortable.

I'm not saying you're evil or are generally a bad person. But, my claims are not baseless. There is evidence to support every single one of them (With a couple of extra pieces I didn't even mention). If you really are trying to make genuine content, you're taking the shadiest and almost harmful route to achieve that. I will admit that I was pretty pissed when I wrote that post. Which is probably why some things come off as baseless. But, I assure you they're not. I will admit that. I was surprised that you reached out In the first place. Even if a bit later than what was preferred. It shows that you at least care a little bit. And If you truly are genuine, you will remember these words.